As the number of dead and seriously and/or permanently disabled caused by these Experimental Emergency Medical Countermeasures (EEMCs, previously referred to as “COVID-19 vaccines”) reaches heights beyond imagination, the question now is…….which COVID criminals need to be prosecuted?
This is an easy question to answer in the case of those who plotted, planned and benefited from this crime against humanity. Those knowingly involved in highly dangerous and risky gain-of-function viral research, like Drs Fauci and Baric, would be obvious candidates but there are likely to be many more who really knew the dangers or, worse still, purposely used SARS-CoV-2 as a convenient bioweapon to achieve their goals.
The question becomes more difficult to answer for the various so-called “health experts”, advisory committees, drug regulators (eg the US FDA, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration), mainstream news media, health professional regulators, executives at the WHO, CEPI, GAVI, UN, CDC and others. Where do you begin and where do you stop? They are all culpable.
One of the best ethical tests in my book is the “shoe on the other foot” test.
In the beginning, early 2020, I became suspicious of the COVID narrative because I knew lies were being told by the FDA and our TGA about ivermectin being a dangerous horse medicine. As we all now know, this was necessary under US law to permit the EEMCs to be used under Emergency Use Authorisation legislation. It was essential to claim that there was no alternative treatment to EEMCs and for the first time in history, early treatment of an infection was forbidden. This cost hundreds of thousands of lives.
The more I looked into it, the more suspicious I became about the EEMCs. What I am trying to say is that, in the beginning, if I did not know how dangerous the EEMCs actually were so how could I blame the drug regulators for not knowing? If the truth were known, I suspect the drug regulators knew little about the mRNA “vaccines”, some might not have even known they were actually EEMCs. We simply do not know but we must find out.
Contrary to popular belief, drug regulators often do not possess the internal expertise to deal with new technologies and they rely upon sister regulators to provide advice or external expert advice. I suspect the Australian TGA may have heavily relied on the US FDA evaluation reports of the EEMCs and even did a “cut and paste” of the FDA evaluation reports to arrive at its own public evaluation report (called AUSPAR). I still find it unbelievable how the TGA turned a blind eye to the deficiencies and dangers posed by the EEMC data package in terms lack of Good Manufacturing Practice, animal safety data and poor quality clinical trial data used for registration. It appears to me they were under orders. The EEMCs should never have been approved in my opinion.
Some might try to hide behind the secrecy surrounding the development, testing and “approval” of these EEMCs which was unprecedented. Even the FDA sought to keep the data secret for 75 years!
But now, there is no excuse not knowing. The EEMCs have caused more death and serious injury than any pharmaceutical in history (note: the EEMCs were not developed to the standards of conventional “pharmaceuticals”). The commonly used and pointed probing phrase “what did they know and when did they know it” springs to mind. This could be a useful demarcation line.
Anyone working within the national adverse drug reporting systems now knows, or should know, the truth. In order to suppress the deadly toll of the EEMCs there must be active and purposeful cover up or manipulation of data. In my view, the people doing this have criminal exposure and should be the first target for prosecution as it is primarily this corrupted data that Big Pharma clings to in order to claim “safety” for the “vaccines” and keep this facade going.
The senior bureaucrat so-called “health experts” who continue to make COVID “vaccine” policy and support mandatory vaccination also have exposure. Ignorance is no longer an excuse. The red flags are everywhere. There is no good news about these EEMCs (“vaccines”)……only continuing bad news.
With huge and continuing Big Pharma profits at stake you can bet there will be attempts to justify the EEMCs and fend off litigation and criminal charges. One recent published paper claimed the “vaccines” saved 20 million lives based on absolutely nil evidence – what a joke. Another published paper claimed unvaccinated drivers caused more car crashes – another joke.
The only question now is………how many days or weeks of further bad news will be needed before these EEMCs are withdrawn worldwide? Then we will start seeing people thrown under the bus, one after another.
One thing is for sure, unless people are held to criminal account and go to jail, we are guaranteed to repeat this sad saga again and again.
Like countless other “ingenues” in the general community, I had no particular concern about promised vaccines during the early days of Covid throughout 2020. Indeed, after receiving dire accounts of Covid19 from twitter feeds from China and Northern Italy, I was hoping for the development of a vaccine sooner, rather than later. It was only after the first death of an Australian woman (known to a family member)after being administered with AZ, that I began to explore the arcane world of the development of mRNA vaccines for corona viruses. It was then that I became aware that animal trials had been unsuccessful. I feel grateful that this poor lady’s demise was reported, because thereafter information on adverse reactions was not forthcoming.
Subsequent countless hours of research in areas of virology, vaccinology and epidemiology ( about which I previously knew zilch!) - and acquaintance through social media with the “resistance” of all the heroes - MCullough, Malone, Cole, Fenton, Ionnides, Van Den Bossche, Bhattacharya et al & of course, our own Altman & Clancy - convinced me that the genetic “vaccines” were potentially deadly, as well as being unnecessary since successful early treatment was available.
All of the above was not only available, but basic knowledge, for all those medical bureaucrats who became responsible for the implementation of the vaccine regime. As for the medical profession itself - I am aware of the threats of deregistration and other punishment to those who expressed opposing views. Only this morning I heard news that a distinguished doctor in our district has chosen retirement because he could no longer (emotionally) deal with the number of patients presenting with adverse reactions. He had previously been unable to prescribe Ivermectin to a friend because, he said, “they are watching me”.
So, who should be brought to account when this scandal is finally exposed to the world? It will take the wisdom of Job.