AN EMERGENCY MEETING OF TGA IS NEEDED TODAY ! PART 2

Doctors who do not warn of potential heart damage now should be sued for failure to properly inform their patients in the event of jab adverse effects

A short video message to my subscribers……….

This is the second part of my Substack published two days ago (27th July) entitled “An emergency meeting of TGA is needed today”. This Substack was about the publication of a clinical trial which showed evidence of an alarming incidence of 2.8% (1 in 35) of myocarditis following Moderna booster injection as determined by sensitive blood biomarker analysis. Of all my Substacks (I’ve published 136 since early January this year), this was perhaps the most important Substack and I would like to add a few more comments and information in relation to that posting below.

Firstly, I omitted the link to Dr. John Campbell’s podcast covering this latest clinical report of myocarditis. CLICK HERE to view.

I also strongly disagree with the concluding opinions of the authors of the Swiss paper when they refer to myocarditis being “mild and transient”. Myocarditis is, by definition, heart damage and should not be minimised especially given the background of unexplained sudden death following the introduction of these injections around the world. In fact, it was so concerning to the researchers that the participants in the study were told not to exercise following injection.

There has been an article published in Epoch Times which has now provided further comment (see below)

1 In 35 Myocarditis Epoch Times 26 July 2023

188KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

I note with great interest that the Epoch Times article states that:

“Moderna was required by U.S. authorities to conduct a prospective study to assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis following a booster among adults, with a projected completion date of June 30, 2023. Neither the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nor Moderna have disclosed the results of the study as of yet.

Pfizer was required to conduct a similar study, with results due on Dec. 31, 2022, but the FDA changed the end date at the request of Pfizer.”

This is highly significant. At last, there are some signs that the drug regulators are responding responsibly to the unexplained explosion of cardiac deaths reported in the US CDC VAERS adverse drug reaction reporting system, more than 1000 professional athletes simply dropping dead following injection, cardiologists reporting a high incidence of myocarditis, life insurance companies reporting a 40% jump in claims and more than 3400 publications of serious adverse events in the literature.

However, I remain suspicious and concerned.

We know our drug regulatory, The Australian TGA, have persisted in the ridiculous claim that myocarditis was “rare”. I refer my readers to:

27^th June: “100 cases x 1200 cardiologists = 120,000 cases of “rare” myocarditis!”

25^th June: “What is Rare?”

6^th July: Bombshell report: 74% of deaths post-vax due to vax”

I would very much like to see the clinical trial protocol which was designed by Big Pharma to study the link between the Covid injections and myocarditis. It is well known that the design of studies can cloud or bias the results. One can set out to purposely design a study to demonstrate harm (eg the hydroxychloroquin studies in the UK using an excessive dose of drug in seriously ill late stage patients) or to prove efficacy using statistical tricks (eg. the original Covid “vaccine” clinical trials using relative efficacy vs absolute efficacy and using inappropriate primary endpoints in the study). We also know there are serious allegations of trial fraud regarding Covid “vaccine” trials.

We also know that a recent retrospective study in Denmark showed 4% of batches of Covid injections were responsible for 74% of the serious adverse drug reactions. See the paper below:

Schmeling Batch To Batch Variation Adrs

121KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

and John Campbell’s interview with one of the authors of that paper. CLICK HERE to view.

I’d like to see a batch analysis of the Covid injections used in the prospective myocarditis trials requested of the FDA. What was the concentration of mRNA in these batches? I’d like to see the definition of “myocarditis” and the “normal range of troponin T” used in the study. Were batches of low potency selected for the trials so as to minimise the chance of myocarditis? Who knows? I will be looking to see who did the trials and what were their connections directly or indirectly with Pfizer and Moderna.

In my opinion, the bottom line is that any drug which is shown to damage heart muscle in 2.8% of individuals, no matter how minor, should never be used in healthy people and should never be mandated for anyone. Any doctor who does not adequately warn their patients of this potential adverse effect is, in my opinion, behaving recklessly and unprofessionally and is now legally exposed.

I’ve (rightly) become highly suspicious of clinical reports done by Big Pharma purporting to show safety. We have all been fooled before.