BRITISH PARLIAMENTARIANS RUN FROM THE TRUTH
Debate on Excess Deaths in UK Parliament brought on by MP Andrew Bridgen
Out of 650 Members….count the number of MPs who are interested in the tens of thousands of British citizens unexpectedly dying non-COVID deaths following the COVID “vaccine” rollouts.
Many believe the Covid-19 injections have killed more than COVID-19 itself – See Steve Kirsch Substack of 22 Oct. (CLICK HERE).
Politicians scurry from Parliamentary chambers like cockroaches so they can claim plausible deniability; “health experts” deny any evidence of harm because they purposely do not seek or countenance any evidence of harm; and most doctors just do as they are told for fear of loosing their licence of practice. Meanwhile people are dying in enormous numbers and serious injuries are impacting on the population.
PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP (so are investors)
Pfizer and Moderna shares are going down. Novavax shares have crashed 98% from their highs. CLICK HERE to read Dr. Gerry Brady’s Substack.
BRILLIANT PAPER BY DR. STEPHANIE SENEFF
“How the mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines suppress the innate Immune System…”
CLICK HERE to view the paper. Seneff is an amazing scientific commentator in the COVID space. Her analysis is chilling and indicates the mechanism by which the COVID-19 “vaccines” are causing such a high incidence of death and serious injury.
MY SUBSTACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE ENTIRELY FREE. I ENDEAVOUR TO BRING YOU THE TRUTH. PLEASE SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THAT IS ALL I ASK.
The politicians who scurried are cockroaches, I hope the British public wake up and send them packing.
For those who don't do video
VIDEO - UK MP Andrew Bridgen - Parliament debate on Excess deaths (first debate on excess deaths in the world) (Oct.20, 2023)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88QqjfZNdJI&t=1s
TRANSCRIPT
0:05
MP ANDREW BRIDGEN: Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
We've experienced more excess deaths since July 2021 than the whole of 2020. Unlike the pandemic, however, these deaths are not disproportionately of the old. In other words, the excessive deaths are striking down people in the prime of life. But no one seems to care. I fear history will not judge this House kindly. We're still in a country supposedly committed to free and frank exchange of views. It appears that no one cares that no one cares.
Well, I care, Mr. Deputy Speaker. And I credit those members here in attendance today who also care. And I'd also like to thank the honorable member for Lincoln for his support and I'm sorry that he couldn't attend today's debate.
It's taken a lot of effort and more than 20 rejections to be allowed to raise this topic, but at last we're here to discuss the number of people dying. Nothing could be more serious.
Numerous countries are currently gripped in a period of unexpected mortality. And no one wants to talk about it. It's quite normal for death numbers to fluctuate up and down by chance alone, but what we're seeing here is a pattern repeated across countries, and the rise does not let up.
1:16
MP PHILIP DAVIES: Will you give way?
MP ANDREW BRIDGEN: I'll give way to the honorable gentleman.
MP PHILIP DAVIES: I'm very grateful, and can I commend him for his, the tenacious way he's, he's battled on this particular issue. I, I certainly admire him for that. I just want to, where we found the media was in all of this? Because of course during the covid pandemic, every day the media, particularly the BBC, couldn't wait to tell us how many people had died in that particular day without any context of those figures whatsoever. But they seem to have gone strangely quiet over these excess deaths now.
MP ANDREW BRIDGEN: I thank the gentleman for his intervention. He's absolutely right, the media have let the British public down badly. There will be a full press pack going out to all media outlets following my speech with all the evidence to back up all the claims I'll make in that speech, but I don't doubt there'll be no mention of it in the mainstream media.
You might think that a debate about excess deaths is going to be full of numbers. This speech does not have that many numbers because most of the important numbers have been kept hidden. All the data is being oddly presented in a distorted way and concerned people seeking to highlight important findings and ask questions have found themselves inexplicably under attack.
Before debating excess deaths, it's important to understand how excess death is determined, to understand if there is an excess by definition you need to estimate how many deaths it would have been expected. The Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development used 2015 to 2019 as a baseline, and the government's Office of Health Disparities and Improvement [Office for Health Improvement and Disparities] uses 2015 to 2019 baseline, modeled to allow for aging, and I've used that data here.
Unforgivably, the Office of National Statistics have included deaths in 2021 as part of their baseline calculation for expected deaths, as if there was anything normal
about the deaths in 2021. By exaggerating the number of deaths expected, the number of excess can be minimized. Why would ONS want to do that?
There's just too much that we don't know and it's not good enough, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
The ONS published promptly each week the number of deaths that were registered, and while this is commendable, it's not the data point that really matters. There's a total failure to collect, never mind publish, data on deaths that are referred for investigation to the coroner. Why does this matter? A referral means that it can be many months, and given the backlog, many years, before a death is formally registered. Needing to investigate the cause of a death is fair enough. Failing to record when the death happened is not. Because of this problem we actually have no idea how many people actually died in 2021. Even now.
The problem is greatest for for the younger age groups where there's a higher proportion of deaths that are investigated. This data failure is unacceptable. It must change. There's nothing in a coroner's report that can bring anyone back from the dead, and those deaths should be reported.
The youngest age groups are important not only because they should have their whole lives ahead of them. If there is a new cause of excess mortality across the board, it would not be noticed so much in the older cohorts because the extra deaths would be drowned out amongst the expected deaths.
However, in the youngest cohorts that is not the case. There were only 2 extra deaths a day in the second half of 2021 among the 15 to 19 year-old males, but potentially even more if those referred to the coroner were fully included.
In a judicial review of the decision to vaccinate yet younger children the ONS refused in court to give anonymized details about these deaths. They admitted that the data they were withholding was statistically significant. And I quote, they said, the ONS recognizes that more work could be undertaken to examine the mortality rates of young people in 2021 and intends to do so once more reliable data are available.
How many more extra deaths in 15 to 19 year-olds will it take to trigger such work? Surely the ONS should be desperately keen to investigate deaths in young men. Why else have an independent body charged with examining mortality data? Surely the ONS has a responsibility to collect data from the coroners to produce timely information.
Let's move on to old people because most deaths in the old are registered promptly and we do have a better feel for how many older people are dying.
Deaths from dementia and Alzheimers show what we ought to expect. There was a period of high mortality coinciding with covid and lockdowns, but ever since there have been fewer deaths than expected. After a period of high mortality we expect, and historically have seen, a period of low mortality because those who have suddenly died cannot die again. Those whose deaths were slightly premature because of covid and lockdowns, died earlier than they otherwise would have. This principle should hold true for every cause of death in every age group. But that's not what we're seeing.
Even for the over 85 year-olds, according to the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, there were 8,000 excess deaths, 4% above the expected levels, for the 12 months starting in July 2020. That includes all of the autumn 2020 wave of covid, when we had tiering, the second lockdown, and it includes all of the first covid winter.
However, for the year starting July 2022, there have been over 18,000 excess deaths in this age group, 9% above expected levels. More than twice as many in a period when there should have been a deficit. And when deaths from diseases previously associated with old age were actually fewer than expected.
Mr. Deputy Speaker, I have raised my concerns around NG163 and the use of midazolam and morphine which may have caused and may still be causing premature deaths in the vulnerable. But that is, sadly, a debate for another day.
There were just over 14,000 excess deaths in the under 65 year-olds before vaccination from April 2020 to the end of March 2021. Ever since that time there's been over 21,000 excess deaths, ignoring the registration delay problem, the majority, 58% of these deaths, were not attributed to covid.
We turned society upside down before vaccination for fear of excess deaths from covid, today we have substantially more excess deaths, and in younger people, and there's complete and eerie silence, Mr. Deputy Speaker.
...continued...