MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT PFIZER VAX SAFETY RAISED IN INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF DATA
Forensic analysis of subject deaths raises considerable concerns
Normally, allegations and evidence of fraud in a pharmaceutical company sponsored clinical trial (especially one as important as the pivotal Pfizer COVID “vaccine” trial including 44,000 individuals) would raise alarm bells within the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). There have been highly disturbing allegations of fraud heard in US courts first raised by Brooke Jackson regarding this trial. The US FDA did not bother to investigate these allegations and, in fact, facilitated the dismissal of this whistleblower working on the management of the trial. I’ve never heard of a similar report in my 4 decades of working with drug regulators. Similarly, our TGA turned a blind eye to the allegations.
Then, there was the disinformation concerning the claimed 95% clinical trial efficacy which was done using statistical tricks and had no relevance to protection from serious illness, going to hospital with COVID or dying from COVID and the trial did not even attempt to measure viral transmission. Many tricks have been played by the COVID “vaccine” manufacturers (CLICK HERE to view my Substack of 14 August which outlines just some of the tricks).
Now, a recent paper (kindly brought to my attention by the Forever Honourable Craig Kelly last night) raises other serious questions of propriety regarding the methods used to record deaths in the vaccine vs placebo groups. We already know that 5 times the number of vaccinated individuals were dropped from the trial vs those dropped in the placebo group - Why? This could not be by chance. This was reported by myself elsewhere. CLICK HERE to view the paper online and I attach a copy below in case it mysteriously disappears.
In this paper by Michels et al posted as a pre-print on 4 Sept., serious questions were raised about the surprisingly low number of total deaths recorded in this trial. This is really highly suspicious. Also, 3.7x increase in number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in vaccinated subjects vs placebo controls was observed and there appears to be manipulation in the cut-off dates of reporting deaths obscuring a higher number of deaths in the vaccinated group prior to regulatory review thus providing even more suspicion.
Many believe, as I do, that the US FDA and our TGA are totally captured and they do not have permission to investigate the suspicious data analyses and safety reporting. Our TGA continue to say these injections are “safe and effective”. They are not.
MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS
Whenever I get off a Qantas flight, I take the time to mention to cabin crew that I do not appreciate being welcomed to my own country. From now on I will avoid flying Qantas as they are assisting to divide the nation on the basis of race. If you agree, consider signing a petition to let Qantas know how you feel. CLICK HERE. Qantas have lost the plot…….they treat their customers with distain and have behaved reprehensibly. Any goodwill they may have had, has vanished. GOODBYE JOYCE!
MASKS ARE MAKING A COMEBACK !
Despite all the science, masks appear to be coming back. We are being prepared with collusion by the mainstream media in a ramping up of another fear campaign based on a handful of inconsequential infections overseas involving a new variant (probably driven by the inappropriate repeat and unnecessary vaccination).
Dr. Paul Alexander, an epidemiologist, published a list of papers regarding the data on masks 20 Dec. 2021 and it is worth repeating. CLICK HERE to view. Dr. Alexander states: “To date, the evidence has been stable and clear that masks do not work to control the virus and they can be harmful and especially to children.” Don’t let these clowns scare you into wearing a mask in future or putting a mask on a child who is at virtually nil to zero risk of becoming serious ill due to COVID - resist.
MY SUBSTACKS ARE ENTIRELY FREE. SHARE WITH FAMILY AND FRIENDS. THIS IS ALL I ASK. WE WILL WIN BY SPREADING THE TRUTH.
Has anyone ever wondered WHY Pfizer didn’t test for transmission (apart from the obvious that it would show that their product doesn’t work)?
Could it be possibly because there is no study in the last century that has successfully proved that transmission of a pathogenic ‘virus’ / particle in a natural setting actually exists? I’m not talking about a study that injects a cultured medium into someone’s nasal cavity or down someone’s throat/lungs or into their bloodstream….. A study where sick people, made well people sick by breathing/sneezing/coughing on them (a normal, everyday scenario). They did try with the 1918 ‘flu’ - the Rosenau experiment but unfortunately no one was made sick. Looks like they haven’t successfully managed to prove transmission so far unless someone can provide a study?
Another thought… do you remember hearing of one person in Covid isolation that tested positive for the part of the virus after being there for a number of days by themselves, and they (the health overlords) were scrambling to try and provide a reason…..”the virus came through the air conditioning, it went down the hall squeezed under the door”. Could it also be that no pathogen is required?
In regards to the Pfizer study it would be very interesting to find out the current health status for all the individuals in this 44K trial. I wonder how many are injured, or even still alive?
Here's a fun cocktail party line:
"Oh you got the booster?"
"Sure did!"
"Can you guess how many people it was safety tested on?"
"Uh...1,200?"
"Nope. 8."
"8 People ???!!&&!!!???"
"No. 8 mice."
(Turns to face another party guest...)