YOU’VE BEEN GIVEN AN EXPERIMENTAL GENE THERAPY AND TOLD IT WAS A “SAFE VACCINE”

The COVID synthetic gene-based "vaccines" are classified as gene therapy

Here is a link to a terrific article by Dr. Julie Sladen published in the Australians for Science and Freedom (ASF) website 1 Nov. 2023 (also published in the Spectator Australia).  CLICK HERE to view.

Gene therapy is widely regarded as a highly risky form of therapy as compared to conventional drugs, seldom used and usually reserved for the most serious or rare medical conditions where there is no alternative treatment available.  Not only that, the COVID injections were clearly not “vaccines” as they neither prevented infection nor did they prevent transmission of infection.

MORE ON ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING: CDC VAERS MISMANAGEMENT – FRAUD?

The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is a post-marketing voluntary reporting system intended to track all adverse events associated with a vaccine following its release for use.  The VAERS is managed jointly by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Federal Drug Administration (FDA).  VAERS documents only a small fraction of the actual number of adverse events.  Estimates of the under reporting range from about 20 to 100 times ie the real incidence of any adverse event reported in VAERS could be multiplied by 100 to get the real number of adverse events.  VAERS has already reported more adverse events and deaths than all other vaccines combined since 1990.

VAERS, like our own Drug Adverse Event Notification (DAEN) system appears to have no chain-of-custody to ensure the integrity of the system.  There have been many reports of system “cleansing” and mass deletion of records and various manipulations of data by datamanagers.  As stated in my last Substack, these adverse event reporting systems are our only safety net upon which we are dependent to assess the safety of any new drug (like the COVID-19 synthetic mRNA injections) when they have only been given Provisional Approval prior to release to the public based on extremely limited safety data.    

A long and detailed investigation into the integrity of VAERS by Albert Benavides can be found by CLICKING HERE.  

The main areas of claimed data manipulation /obfuscation are listed as:

·      Serious adverse events (such as death, heart attack, stroke and myocarditis) are classified as “not serious”

·      Delays in reporting deaths

·      Adverse reactions to Covid injections are misclassified as another vaccine

·      Lot numbers were recorded inaccurately

·      Only initial adverse event reports are published – how many have since died?

·      Downcoding the seriousness of an event

·      Multiple deaths bundled into a single report

Given the fact that our DAEN system has only acknowledged 14 COVID injection deaths and no deaths for children, it is suspected that data manipulation and obfuscation may also be occurring in the reporting of serious adverse events and deaths in Australia. I want to know who is going to take responsibility for the reliability and integrity of our DAEN system and for any manipulation of the data, coding or reporting which may have the intended effect to minimise safety signals.

WHERE TO GET UNCENSORED INFORMATION?

I highly recommend THE LIGHT AUSTRALIA for uncensored truth. Go to www.thelightaustralia.com

I attach Issue 9 below:

Issue 9 The Light Final Version Screen Single Pages Interactive

2.98MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

ERRATUM

Thanks to many who spotted a typo in my 11 Nov. Substack subtitle which should have read:

“We are not safe and those responsible for keeping us safe do not care”