What about those that were forced out of employment and/or contractual arrangements? They were FORCED out of work, because of workplace mandates! Surely, there’s a case to be made here?
They need to start legal proceedings for loss of wages and employment for not abiding by their mandates. I'm still out of work for not getting their jab in 2021
Also the psycho-social trauma of weaponised state propaganda. This is a well-documented, established point of democide/genocide.
For your excellent reason, and the fact that the mandates were legal under the Emergency and Acts, I believe the case in question will be overturned on appeal because it will put an unreasonable demand on the Commonwealth (i.e., taxpayers).
I hope people can see beyond money and see that justice needs to be about freeing themselves from the framework of the state rather than payouts, but all I see are cries for financial compensation, which may, in the end, sink this.
I really, really hope I am wrong.
Edit: and I say this as someone whos career and life was decimated by the mandates. I do not want one cent. If I did get it, I would donate it to charity. It's blood money.
I want the state out of my life. I want the children to be free.
With you all the way with your statement here ... in spite of my original post, if I had the choice between compensation and freeing myself government meddling in my life ... I’d gladly take the later!!
Thank you very much for your nice comment Klaus. People are partying about this 'win' and have not read the judge's remarks that praise the vaccine and the mandates. I could write an article but I do not think people would be very interested, and at this point I am not sure I really feel like it.
Agreed..I lost my job, though did get another where I didn't need vax but took 12 months and drained my savings. Some people who lost work, lost their homes and everything and some people even committed suicide due to this and the stress it created.
I've been wondering about that; not suing them. I think most people suffered damages by not getting the jabs. There was: the Loss of income, Loss of freedom of movement, Unlawful Discrimination, Malfeasance or misconduct in public office, Misuse of Public Funds, Failure to Enforce Laws, Abuse of Power, Failure to Provide Due Process, Violation of Human Rights, Negligence in Public Safety, Failure in Crisis Management, Conflict of Interest, Violation of Public Trust ... and that's just for starters. I guess it depends on how much money one has or can raise, and the quality of the legal team to execute the case. There is nothing stopping anyone from prosecuting a case like that. I'm not a lawyer but I now this to be a fact.
Fully agree. I was being facetious. At least a precedent has been set for the cowards who gave in. Those unjustly sacked for not following orders to hurt themselves have yet to have many wins, except in some very niche circumstances.
Let’s not keep saying that employers were just poor unsuspecting victims in all this, just ‘following guidelines’. Employers who mandated these shots were, for the most part, not required by the government to do so, but rather did so of their own volition because they wanted to and because they could. May they rot in hell when this gets legs…and may they also be found guilty of unlawfully and unreasonably forcing it onto workers who didn’t want it and/or who were subsequently relieved of their ability to earn a living because of it….
Agree. Not everywhere, of course, but around the world, there were uncounted instances, where, apart from any governmentally imposed mandates, some -- I underline the word some-- employers DID have a choice about imposing a mandate, or not. And many, swept up, slammed that mandate down on everyone in their employ with no medical exemptions, no religious exemptions, and no remorse. I am simply stating a fact.
Not sure what you disagree with? Employers who were under no obligation to mandate the shots eg Bunnings, Woolworths, CBA, QPS etc, can say they were following ‘health advice’ coming from their respective state governments-but that’s a cop out and could’ve just as easily made the decision NOT to mandate. It was truly an offensive plan for the government to delegate such responsibility to the employer in the first place, and sure, the government is perhaps ULTIMATELY responsible…but employers WERE given that choice, and they need to be held accountable for the choice they made…
I’m referring to state government mandates to health workers - both public and private. Small private health businesses were not given a choice and we were threatened with massive fines. It was 100k for the business and 30k for the unvaccinated staff member. That was in WA and it may well have been different for other states. I do not feel we were given a choice. I was fortunate to never have had to ask staff to get vaccinated as they were listening to the state government directives and, at that time, there was trust in our leaders asking us to do ‘the right thing’ for the community.
I applaud small businesses who shut up shop but that is not viable for many businesses with loans, ongoing costs and long leases. The state ‘rent relief’ was a joke and the commercial landlords received all relief money back over the following year.
I agree that businesses who mandated after the state directive mandate was dropped should be held liable for injuries. Some companies are still mandating which is criminal. One must question what incentive drives them to continue demanding staff be vaccinated. Hopefully this case will lead them to review their stance.
What responsibilities is the government delegating/mandating to business now? Now employees are being mandated to be abused in other ways; to fall in line with the UN DEI ESG code. Our culture is going to cntinue to be splodged with graft, dceipt and lies until Australia discontinues it's support for international crime syndicates. Michael Gray Griffith explains: https://www.bitchute.com/video/b23ioEA1enW1/
I’m still stunned that employers disregarded WHS guidelines. How could they know that what they required employees to “use” to “do their jobs” was safe? They didn’t. How could they know the employees personal medical history to know what they asked them to use would not interact negatively? They didn’t. But they pressed on regardless most (not all) of them without questioning. That alone should have sent them running for the hills, or at the very least have sent up a huge red liability flag. Fine or no fine. So now, they may be facing huge fines anyway... just blows my mind.
They just didn’t care. I sent a lot of information to my union about the developing information regarding adverse events, limited efficacy etc and also highlighted ATAGI advice which stated quite clearly in Dec2021 document on the Booster doses, that the safety and efficacy of all these shots was unknown. I was told to get back in my box. If you are going to mandate any substance to be pumped into someone else’s body, you’d want to make sure you knew EVERYTHING about it, so you wouldn’t get sued later. My employer cannot now say ‘they didn’t know’ about any of this because I went through work cover and gave them the same information (work cover didn’t care either just by the way). I have email proof that they DID know about all the negative possibilities, but they didn’t care … they might start caring now though 🤔
Good on you for taking the time to try to enlighten them. If they pressed on in spite of all that you showed them, if the hammer falls they’ve no one to blame but themselves.
Maybe the employers who did this could also be charged with Grievous Bodily Harm, Negligence Occasioning Physical Injury, Manslaughter, Negligence in Office, Coercion and Abuse in Office, Violators of The Nuremberg Code, Mental Torture and Emotional Abuse to name a few. All employers should have sought legal advice before inflicting The Jabbing Frenzy (as Geoff Pain quite rightly puts it) on their willing and unwilling employees. May the plaintiffs be successful. Not that it will extend the life of those now injured to what it should have been had they not gotten the injection of course.
I am waiting to be compensated for not taking the bioweapon shot in the first place and losing my career, and all of the lost earnings since. Wish me luck. (!)
I 🙏the families who have lost loved ones to SADs, sue the companies into oblivion for mandating the shot. The Chief Executives, Senior Management and HR who promoted safe and effective in the workplace with no medical evidence to back it up, 💯there is a special place in hell for you.
Thank you for reporting. Well, whatever happens with this case I do not doubt that, around the world, we will see more in this direction. I really cannot fathom why it was not obvious to more of those who imposed a mandate, or who had some discretion over imposing a mandate, that this day could come. I just don't see how it's PhD-level stuff to comprehend that an experimental "vaccine" using new technology, coming out under "Operation Warp Speed," was going to imply some deaths and injuries-- and when these happened, in many instances, there would be victims and victims' families fired up & lawyered up to fight back, hard. Mandating these jabs was an egregious and appallingly short-sighted violation of human rights. It was not just stupid and cruel, it was criminal. Period.
Many of the injured are living off savings and trying to heal. We don’t have the funds for a legal fight and must rely on lengthy group class actions.
It’s hard to comprehend unless you are living it. It has shown me that if you are not part of ‘the system’ of earning and spending, you are not wanted.
Dear Tracey Lee, I wish you the very best, and that a group class action be of help to you. I totally hear you, that legal fights are not always the best choice for one's time and energy and finances, one has to pick one's battles. It's certainly not one- size-fits-all as to what one should or should not do.
I do know that it's hard to comprehend being in this situation, not because I am, but because since 2021 I have been transcribing testimonies of the jab injured (as well as other relevant testimonies). While it would be impossible to transcribe all the testimonies of the jab injured, I feel it is important to transcribe a large number in order to show that these testimonies have so many things in common and that, very simply, there is a horrific number of them from the US, Canada, UK, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand-- and that's just the English speakers. Apart from documenting the history of this time, I very much hope these testimonies might "wake up" some people, and also give some helpful information to the injured.
Thank you Transcriber B. It is great that you are helping the injured and it is heartening to know that people care.
I agree very much that I also have a role of sharing my story to awaken those that are clueless. Maybe not clueless but wilfully ignorant? We (in the west) are so into ourselves (individualism) that our beliefs are firmly entrenched. A family member being seriously injured may not be enough to change one’s thinking if it threatens their status or living standards.
How can the state government not be held responsible when they imposed the mandate? WA state government mandated many workers including all health. If a small business employed a non vaccinated person, they were threatened with a 100k fine (per unvaccinated person).
This is clearly the government passing the blame for something that was their poor judgement.
I’m seriously vaccine injured (transverse myelitis) and have a health business. I’m not eligible for workers compensation nor the federal compensation scheme. I believe I have a unique (unwanted) perspective.
Agree very much, the government is very much to blame. As for who had no choice, and who had some level of discretion, it's a mosaic. But even where it was the government that mandated the jabs, in many instances (I cannot speak to the case of WA, I am more familiar with the US) employers had some discretion. For example, many blanket-denied applications for religious exemptions which, in some instances, they could have easily granted. As for religious exemptions, in some US state legislatures they actually passed legislation denying religious exemptions. As I say, for the question of who was responsible at what levels, it's a mosaic.
As an employer I told my workers it was totally up to them if they got the clot shot , I have a healthy respect for one’s own bodily autonomy, to my dismay 3/5 of my workers went ahead and got it anyway from the pressures exerted away from their workplace, :-family , peers, society itself , can we put a cost on the emotional and physical toll this decision to inject everyone has had? I don’t believe there is enough money in the world to repay the hurt these vaccine mandates unleashed upon our societies, bring in the lawyers like jackals on a carcass left by lions . The anguish I feel in my gut at what has happened is a burden that I didn’t see coming, this whole saga has ravaged our world and it’s bubbling away under the surface and when the unspoken truth is bought into the light and fully understood maybe we can start to heal
When are the real culprits at the top going to be brought to justice for the fascist policies they foisted on humanity? Answer; never. Instead, they are rewarded with King’s Birthday Honours. If this had been post WW2, it would have been a Nuremberg trial for these culprits. I am ashamed of my country.
Philip - I spoke to Sarah Mansfield MP today she is a GP. She told me that covid is more likely to cause myocarditis than vaccines and that the excess deaths are being driven by covid. Can you kindly point me in the direction of evidence so that I can write back to her.
Hi, just happened to be reading your question and thought you’d appreciate some kind of response to your question. Peter McCullough has provide evidence in regard to your question. Also, John Campbell has done a video on it. There was also a pathology ‘study’ (from Germany?) linking the ‘vaccine’ to heart issues. While not every case of myocarditis or pericarditis is related to the ‘vaccine’ their is more than effort evidence to show a significant linkage 🥺
What about those that were forced out of employment and/or contractual arrangements? They were FORCED out of work, because of workplace mandates! Surely, there’s a case to be made here?
What about those who were forced to Die?
So true Geoff, and we must continue to demand justice for those; who died, were maimed and injured (physically & legally)!
They need to start legal proceedings for loss of wages and employment for not abiding by their mandates. I'm still out of work for not getting their jab in 2021
Also the psycho-social trauma of weaponised state propaganda. This is a well-documented, established point of democide/genocide.
For your excellent reason, and the fact that the mandates were legal under the Emergency and Acts, I believe the case in question will be overturned on appeal because it will put an unreasonable demand on the Commonwealth (i.e., taxpayers).
I hope people can see beyond money and see that justice needs to be about freeing themselves from the framework of the state rather than payouts, but all I see are cries for financial compensation, which may, in the end, sink this.
I really, really hope I am wrong.
Edit: and I say this as someone whos career and life was decimated by the mandates. I do not want one cent. If I did get it, I would donate it to charity. It's blood money.
I want the state out of my life. I want the children to be free.
With you all the way with your statement here ... in spite of my original post, if I had the choice between compensation and freeing myself government meddling in my life ... I’d gladly take the later!!
Thank you for your clear post, especially your
{... It's blood money. I want the state out of my life. I want the children to be free...}
My utmost respect to you !! 👍👍💪^3
Thank you very much for your nice comment Klaus. People are partying about this 'win' and have not read the judge's remarks that praise the vaccine and the mandates. I could write an article but I do not think people would be very interested, and at this point I am not sure I really feel like it.
Stop the rot from the top https://citizengo.org/en-au/node/212863?dr=24147196::d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e&utm_source=em&utm_medium=e-mail&utm_content=em_btn&utm_campaign=EN_AU-2024-01-27-Local-OT-GCH-212863-Disband_the_CDC.02_AA_L_Retargeting&mkt_tok=OTA3LU9EWS0wNTEAAAGRBhkbfghTxjfPGhmj98qgZ8_GZkzSlgfrESSnkiNvYGa-duN3dV2ZMrlXiFo1S1rNlHyND7ON8JD1UwobVE8aaxQxlXluh7ocFFE9JKs8Tl8AK9Bv3g
Exactly. I am waiting for compensation. Fking bastards.
Agreed..I lost my job, though did get another where I didn't need vax but took 12 months and drained my savings. Some people who lost work, lost their homes and everything and some people even committed suicide due to this and the stress it created.
It seems those people did their employers a favour.
I am unsure what you are inferring. Can you elaborate please?
I just mean that by declining the jabs we avoided harm and so we can't sue them for forcing us to get harmed.
I've been wondering about that; not suing them. I think most people suffered damages by not getting the jabs. There was: the Loss of income, Loss of freedom of movement, Unlawful Discrimination, Malfeasance or misconduct in public office, Misuse of Public Funds, Failure to Enforce Laws, Abuse of Power, Failure to Provide Due Process, Violation of Human Rights, Negligence in Public Safety, Failure in Crisis Management, Conflict of Interest, Violation of Public Trust ... and that's just for starters. I guess it depends on how much money one has or can raise, and the quality of the legal team to execute the case. There is nothing stopping anyone from prosecuting a case like that. I'm not a lawyer but I now this to be a fact.
Fully agree. I was being facetious. At least a precedent has been set for the cowards who gave in. Those unjustly sacked for not following orders to hurt themselves have yet to have many wins, except in some very niche circumstances.
Yep, we need justice, too! Getting mine, slowly but surely: https://okaythennews.substack.com/p/my-2nd-win-against-covid-vaccine
Stop the rot from the top https://citizengo.org/en-au/node/212863?dr=24147196::d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e&utm_source=em&utm_medium=e-mail&utm_content=em_btn&utm_campaign=EN_AU-2024-01-27-Local-OT-GCH-212863-Disband_the_CDC.02_AA_L_Retargeting&mkt_tok=OTA3LU9EWS0wNTEAAAGRBhkbfghTxjfPGhmj98qgZ8_GZkzSlgfrESSnkiNvYGa-duN3dV2ZMrlXiFo1S1rNlHyND7ON8JD1UwobVE8aaxQxlXluh7ocFFE9JKs8Tl8AK9Bv3g
Let’s not keep saying that employers were just poor unsuspecting victims in all this, just ‘following guidelines’. Employers who mandated these shots were, for the most part, not required by the government to do so, but rather did so of their own volition because they wanted to and because they could. May they rot in hell when this gets legs…and may they also be found guilty of unlawfully and unreasonably forcing it onto workers who didn’t want it and/or who were subsequently relieved of their ability to earn a living because of it….
Agree. Not everywhere, of course, but around the world, there were uncounted instances, where, apart from any governmentally imposed mandates, some -- I underline the word some-- employers DID have a choice about imposing a mandate, or not. And many, swept up, slammed that mandate down on everyone in their employ with no medical exemptions, no religious exemptions, and no remorse. I am simply stating a fact.
Quite right, Mrs B. The aviation industry in Australia did just as you have described.
FOI 4274: Aviation industry pressures federal government to implement vaccine mandates and gets knocked back, decides to implement them at the corporate level: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/yes-they-did-know-australias-covid
I disagree. Each state was different and in WA many industries were mandated by the state. Definitely all health and front line jobs.
Not sure what you disagree with? Employers who were under no obligation to mandate the shots eg Bunnings, Woolworths, CBA, QPS etc, can say they were following ‘health advice’ coming from their respective state governments-but that’s a cop out and could’ve just as easily made the decision NOT to mandate. It was truly an offensive plan for the government to delegate such responsibility to the employer in the first place, and sure, the government is perhaps ULTIMATELY responsible…but employers WERE given that choice, and they need to be held accountable for the choice they made…
I’m referring to state government mandates to health workers - both public and private. Small private health businesses were not given a choice and we were threatened with massive fines. It was 100k for the business and 30k for the unvaccinated staff member. That was in WA and it may well have been different for other states. I do not feel we were given a choice. I was fortunate to never have had to ask staff to get vaccinated as they were listening to the state government directives and, at that time, there was trust in our leaders asking us to do ‘the right thing’ for the community.
I applaud small businesses who shut up shop but that is not viable for many businesses with loans, ongoing costs and long leases. The state ‘rent relief’ was a joke and the commercial landlords received all relief money back over the following year.
I agree that businesses who mandated after the state directive mandate was dropped should be held liable for injuries. Some companies are still mandating which is criminal. One must question what incentive drives them to continue demanding staff be vaccinated. Hopefully this case will lead them to review their stance.
One had a choice. Just say no. Many did, the weak did not. Too attached to cars, houses, and holidays in Bali to consider health aspects.
What responsibilities is the government delegating/mandating to business now? Now employees are being mandated to be abused in other ways; to fall in line with the UN DEI ESG code. Our culture is going to cntinue to be splodged with graft, dceipt and lies until Australia discontinues it's support for international crime syndicates. Michael Gray Griffith explains: https://www.bitchute.com/video/b23ioEA1enW1/
The case involved Pericarditis which is caused by Endotoxin in the Employer Mandated Jabs
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pericarditis-deaths-after-covid19
I’m still stunned that employers disregarded WHS guidelines. How could they know that what they required employees to “use” to “do their jobs” was safe? They didn’t. How could they know the employees personal medical history to know what they asked them to use would not interact negatively? They didn’t. But they pressed on regardless most (not all) of them without questioning. That alone should have sent them running for the hills, or at the very least have sent up a huge red liability flag. Fine or no fine. So now, they may be facing huge fines anyway... just blows my mind.
They just didn’t care. I sent a lot of information to my union about the developing information regarding adverse events, limited efficacy etc and also highlighted ATAGI advice which stated quite clearly in Dec2021 document on the Booster doses, that the safety and efficacy of all these shots was unknown. I was told to get back in my box. If you are going to mandate any substance to be pumped into someone else’s body, you’d want to make sure you knew EVERYTHING about it, so you wouldn’t get sued later. My employer cannot now say ‘they didn’t know’ about any of this because I went through work cover and gave them the same information (work cover didn’t care either just by the way). I have email proof that they DID know about all the negative possibilities, but they didn’t care … they might start caring now though 🤔
Good on you for taking the time to try to enlighten them. If they pressed on in spite of all that you showed them, if the hammer falls they’ve no one to blame but themselves.
Maybe the employers who did this could also be charged with Grievous Bodily Harm, Negligence Occasioning Physical Injury, Manslaughter, Negligence in Office, Coercion and Abuse in Office, Violators of The Nuremberg Code, Mental Torture and Emotional Abuse to name a few. All employers should have sought legal advice before inflicting The Jabbing Frenzy (as Geoff Pain quite rightly puts it) on their willing and unwilling employees. May the plaintiffs be successful. Not that it will extend the life of those now injured to what it should have been had they not gotten the injection of course.
There are corporate work places still demanding cv19 jabs for all employees, and they're not in "heath" setting. Great article to send them.
I agree.
I am waiting to be compensated for not taking the bioweapon shot in the first place and losing my career, and all of the lost earnings since. Wish me luck. (!)
I 🙏the families who have lost loved ones to SADs, sue the companies into oblivion for mandating the shot. The Chief Executives, Senior Management and HR who promoted safe and effective in the workplace with no medical evidence to back it up, 💯there is a special place in hell for you.
{...there is a special place in hell for you...}
Seems the alledged overpopulation will be shifted from planet Earth to that cosy place you mentioned above ...🤣🤣🤣
Tuvali, O. et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine - just one of many papers
J. Clin. Med. 2022,11,2219. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jcm11082219
Thank you for reporting. Well, whatever happens with this case I do not doubt that, around the world, we will see more in this direction. I really cannot fathom why it was not obvious to more of those who imposed a mandate, or who had some discretion over imposing a mandate, that this day could come. I just don't see how it's PhD-level stuff to comprehend that an experimental "vaccine" using new technology, coming out under "Operation Warp Speed," was going to imply some deaths and injuries-- and when these happened, in many instances, there would be victims and victims' families fired up & lawyered up to fight back, hard. Mandating these jabs was an egregious and appallingly short-sighted violation of human rights. It was not just stupid and cruel, it was criminal. Period.
Many of the injured are living off savings and trying to heal. We don’t have the funds for a legal fight and must rely on lengthy group class actions.
It’s hard to comprehend unless you are living it. It has shown me that if you are not part of ‘the system’ of earning and spending, you are not wanted.
Dear Tracey Lee, I wish you the very best, and that a group class action be of help to you. I totally hear you, that legal fights are not always the best choice for one's time and energy and finances, one has to pick one's battles. It's certainly not one- size-fits-all as to what one should or should not do.
I do know that it's hard to comprehend being in this situation, not because I am, but because since 2021 I have been transcribing testimonies of the jab injured (as well as other relevant testimonies). While it would be impossible to transcribe all the testimonies of the jab injured, I feel it is important to transcribe a large number in order to show that these testimonies have so many things in common and that, very simply, there is a horrific number of them from the US, Canada, UK, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand-- and that's just the English speakers. Apart from documenting the history of this time, I very much hope these testimonies might "wake up" some people, and also give some helpful information to the injured.
May you find the healing that is best for you.
Thank you Transcriber B. It is great that you are helping the injured and it is heartening to know that people care.
I agree very much that I also have a role of sharing my story to awaken those that are clueless. Maybe not clueless but wilfully ignorant? We (in the west) are so into ourselves (individualism) that our beliefs are firmly entrenched. A family member being seriously injured may not be enough to change one’s thinking if it threatens their status or living standards.
It’s a battle 🙏
🙏
How can the state government not be held responsible when they imposed the mandate? WA state government mandated many workers including all health. If a small business employed a non vaccinated person, they were threatened with a 100k fine (per unvaccinated person).
This is clearly the government passing the blame for something that was their poor judgement.
I’m seriously vaccine injured (transverse myelitis) and have a health business. I’m not eligible for workers compensation nor the federal compensation scheme. I believe I have a unique (unwanted) perspective.
May you find healing.
Agree very much, the government is very much to blame. As for who had no choice, and who had some level of discretion, it's a mosaic. But even where it was the government that mandated the jabs, in many instances (I cannot speak to the case of WA, I am more familiar with the US) employers had some discretion. For example, many blanket-denied applications for religious exemptions which, in some instances, they could have easily granted. As for religious exemptions, in some US state legislatures they actually passed legislation denying religious exemptions. As I say, for the question of who was responsible at what levels, it's a mosaic.
well done great story Dr Altman
And this is brilliant, a terrific precedent.
my only sadness is for the thousands of people unable to have their gene-vaccine injuries recognised as such, who will therefore not get compensated
As an employer I told my workers it was totally up to them if they got the clot shot , I have a healthy respect for one’s own bodily autonomy, to my dismay 3/5 of my workers went ahead and got it anyway from the pressures exerted away from their workplace, :-family , peers, society itself , can we put a cost on the emotional and physical toll this decision to inject everyone has had? I don’t believe there is enough money in the world to repay the hurt these vaccine mandates unleashed upon our societies, bring in the lawyers like jackals on a carcass left by lions . The anguish I feel in my gut at what has happened is a burden that I didn’t see coming, this whole saga has ravaged our world and it’s bubbling away under the surface and when the unspoken truth is bought into the light and fully understood maybe we can start to heal
What was your stance on masks wearing?
Did you let your workers decide themselves if they want to wear them?
Let's hope an avalanche of claims reign down on both the employers and gov heads for the harms they did to people🙏
When are the real culprits at the top going to be brought to justice for the fascist policies they foisted on humanity? Answer; never. Instead, they are rewarded with King’s Birthday Honours. If this had been post WW2, it would have been a Nuremberg trial for these culprits. I am ashamed of my country.
Philip - I spoke to Sarah Mansfield MP today she is a GP. She told me that covid is more likely to cause myocarditis than vaccines and that the excess deaths are being driven by covid. Can you kindly point me in the direction of evidence so that I can write back to her.
Hi, just happened to be reading your question and thought you’d appreciate some kind of response to your question. Peter McCullough has provide evidence in regard to your question. Also, John Campbell has done a video on it. There was also a pathology ‘study’ (from Germany?) linking the ‘vaccine’ to heart issues. While not every case of myocarditis or pericarditis is related to the ‘vaccine’ their is more than effort evidence to show a significant linkage 🥺