Thanks for providing the link to Hansard, Phillip. We all need to write to the Nayers and ask them to explain themselves. (It was good to see, however, that the vote was THAT CLOSE - a couple of years ago the "bipartisanship" on pandemonium seemed bleaker.) The exposure of government censorship on digital platforms should also make my "save our ABC" friends think twice about how far these tentacles reach into their trusted national broadcaster.
I'm ringing all of the nays and absentees. I will publish their responses. They are all claiming they don't know what is happening and have never heard of the excess deaths. People DESPERATELY need to RING AND EMAIL THESE PEOPLE. This is entirely a partisan exercise and there are cowards and cry bullies everywhere.
You may want to hold off for a bit and have a look into what this motion was and what it wasn't. Hint this motion was not for an inquiry, but there was one and the vote was very different and more like what I would have expected i.e. it was lost by a large majority. I'm writing a post at the moment that explains what happened.
It's pretty clear from the Hansard what it is. "(b) there is a need for further inquiry and scrutiny as to the reasons for these excess deaths, including why dementia and diabetes have seen significant increases in recent years."
The 'nay' staffers are pretending they don't even know about the excess deaths. Watered down or not, the fact that their staffers don't even want to acknowledge the excess deaths is revealing. Think about where we were 6 months ago. The fact that Lib are even voting for an inquiry is astounding given their ties with Pfizer. I'm publishing it.
I have personally spoken with Greens Sen Jordon Steele John several times over the past 18 months. He is responsible for the Health portfolio for the Greens. I can assure you his staff KNOW there are excess deaths. His staff are mostly very young, very well meaning, personally insecure and terrified of losing the moral high ground. They seek refuge in the idea that excess deaths are due to Covid and long-Covid. They fear that any inquiry into excess deaths will take the focus away from The Voice Referendum and Climate Change. This is all that I can surmise.
Bingo. I had a rather different conversation with a senior staffer - I won't break journalistic confidentiality but they know there are excess deaths and are concerned.
There is a action, called a cover-upper which covers UP the roll outs of the RF Radiation, of first telegraph, WORLD WIDE Ship to Shore Communications RADAR System, by first the USA.INC Military Into-dust-ya'll Complex, 1918 than AM, and FM, than Microwave, than dish, and Sell-u-LIAR de-VICES!
Covered by the RESEARCHED "Invisible Rainbow," here....
It's not as clear as you think. What was the actual motion? Check Hansard the day before (23/3/23) and you'll see what a motion proposing a committee be established looks like. The motion 24/3/23 is not what you think it is, it's just an empty request for acknowledgement.
It's no more like Pauline Hanson's "it's OK to be white" motion.
Ok, but they aren't even acknowledging it (reality). We can nit pick but that doesn't win wars. I'm still going to hold them to account. My article will be very revealing about what is going on behind the scenes.
You'll have to read Hansard there is no fancy graphic if you want to verify. It sort of steals the thunder of the post I'm about to write. Here is a link to how they voted 23/3/23.
I've gone through the lists of votes for/against both (a) the Roberts motion for an investigation into the WHO+amendments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfiwYAF1SMU and (b) this excess deaths inquiry. Lambie & Tyrrell voted YES for the WHOinq but abstained from DeathsInq; D.Pocock & Thorpe voted NO for the WHOinq but abstained from DeathsInq. There were seven other Senators missing from the WHOinq vote (4 LNP: Birmingham, Brockman, O'Sullivan, Hughes) + 3 Labor: Ayres, Farrell, Gallagher) and six Senators missing from the DeathsInq vote (3 LNP: Cadell, Reynolds, Hume; 3 Labor: Smith, Sterle, Watt) plus the four abstentions mentioned above. All of those in LNP need to be asked why they were absent from these important votes, as well as the four abstainers who are purportedly meant to keep the bastards honest. Are the numbers of people present at these votes being rigged?
The vote mentioned in this post are not the votes for the forming of a committee to investigate excess deaths. This vote was the after party. The "real vote" happened the day before and the coalition heroes don't look so heroic (except maybe Antic). When asked to vote on something more substantial like an "actual inquiry" rather than just an "acknowledgment" they towed the party line or just did a no show.
Wow, talk about smoke and mirrors! I was getting ready to thank the LNP Senators who voted yes. How depressing! Maybe we need to ask those who absented themselves for some accountability too - 51% turnout is abominable. Hopefully it means some Senators know full well the obscenity going down, aren't supportive of it, but are too scared to say so.
We are in the time of sunshine patriots (the libs who voted yes late in the piece). We still need them. Puritanism won't get us anywhere but we can still have long memories about whom to trust.
And nothing relevant in the dropdown menus (but likely that's due to my ignorance of the platform). Are you able to link the exact vote you are talking about?
I've had a look at the preceding day's vote as per Ivo's substack: only 6 from LNP (apart from Antic) showed up to vote that day and they all voted No, ie, at least 22 LNP were no shows; Lambie & Tyrrell also didn't show. Seems like the deck was obviously stacked in advance so that the other supportive LNPers didn't bother to come (Rennick & Canavan). The next day most of those absent LNPers showed up and voted Yes to the toothless motion; did they already know it would be defeated?
The first vote was never going to get through given how it was worded. imo Babbit went too hard the first time around. I have spoken to a lot of people today. Given that it's about politics and the committee in the first vote was designed badly, it was never going to get up. The wording of the second vote was much better in order to get people on side. This was not 'stacked.' It was just designed badly and he was told to go back to the drawing board.
We who are immersed in these data need to understand that most of the staffers don't even know about the excess deaths or why this is an issue. I'll be writing a piece on this. I can't say a lot due to confidentiality, but the most important thing I can say is that people need to ring and email their senators. They have no idea what is going on. They have next to no interaction with the public.
You are very welcome. It was hard going yesterday. I would focus on the senators in your state first. Ring them and tell them how you feel, then ask for their email addresses as a follow up. Great work, this is the activism that is desperately needed. Some humble advice, you will have to stick to the facts and not let emotion get in the way. The staffers have no idea what is happening, have never heard of the issue.
Edit: senators from 'other' states definitely take notice. I rang all around the country.
"We all need to write to the Nayers and ask them to explain themselves."
The threadbare platitude "the pen is mightier than the sword." And what, pray tell, do you hope to achieve by us doing so? Will the criminals who are responsible for this (all of parliament, all politicians, the entire government bureaucracy and apparatus, the judges and the courts and all the quisling establishment institutions, the corporate employers and their career lackeys) be subjected to swift, severe justice? Will the injured be healed? Will the dead be brought back to life?
Every one of them - on both sides, and the so-called independents, of this sham pantomime of a parliament, in this charade of a counterfeit democracy - ushered COVID-19 (the pathogen, the Psy-Op and propaganda, the "Pandemic Emergency Response," and of course, the diabolical bioweapon masquerading as a "vaccine" for which all of the preceding was a pretext for - the whole execrable lot) into the country and onto us, and then beat, compelled, and in so many ways coerced so many into rolling-up the sleeve and taking the diabolical injections, and at this irretrievably late stage you are still advocating writing letters?
" ... (It was good to see, however, that the vote was THAT CLOSE - a couple of years ago the "bipartisanship" on pandemonium seemed bleaker.) "
In order for the fiction of rule of law and democracy to keep the stupid cattle (that's how these politicians and their corporate-owner bosses consider the people) believing the our world is not completely managed and controlled by the public-private stakeholders (i.e. the corporate-owner bosses), government must allow a few "I speak for the people!" voices to become prominent. This is what we have here with G. Rennick, M. Roberts, and P. Hanson. Quite frankly, it is foolish beyond words to believe that the vote was nothing more than a cynical burlesque. The result was per-determined, of course, and the intention was to keep fools believing that the system is working and the political tide is turning.
Thanks for the explosion. I tend to agree after the discussion which followed my initial comment (the one that you reacted to, perhaps before reading the rest?) It does seem like a token gesture/pantomime to conceal the totalitarian underbelly, and letters will just be binned.
Which makes me wonder about the other "vote" after Malcolm Roberts' motion to inquire about WHO+IHR changes. Was there a vote which preceded that "narrowly defeated" (30Y/32N) motion, similar to the one that Ivo has revealed in his latest substack?
And here's my futile hope: Perhaps when you meet someone who is "resisting" but not so strongly as you advocate, you could be more patient with your responses rather than dumping your justifiable anger and sardonic wit onto that "foolish beyond words" nitwit?
Yes, I should move on, but it bothers me that I may have been too submissive in my apology. Accordingly I'd like to point out that while I am sincere about my apology with regards to impugning your first comment and disregarding the rest in which your opinion and your posture on the matters discussed evolved as the thread lengthened, I am still resolutely standing behind my words and the content of my comment. I take none of those points back, nor will I deny the asperity with which I made them.
What I do especially regret is if the appearance it gave was of being an attack on you personally, which would have been absurd of me since I do not know you at all. I hope you will be able to accept that it was not intended as an ad hominem or in any way a calumny.
Oh, and you're most definitely not a ... thing that you said, your last word.
I've always had my doubts - I'm sure most have - and there has ever been reason to be sceptical and critical about it, but with COVID-19, the curtains have parted and we should have all seen the system and how it truly works (and more importantly, for whom) more clearly than ever. Once seen, there can be no denial, and it becomes not only irresponsible in doing, but we become accessory to criminality.
Apologies are in order - and I do apologise, unreservedly.
There is nothing to excuse my behaviour. I read your initial comment a day or so ago, and have been stewing like a ... well, a stew. I'll try to behave, and at least hold-off responding until I've read the entre thread, or allowed the conversation to develop perhaps with some of my own input to steer it before it strays too far from my preferred viewpoint.
No worries. The final ten minutes of Denis Rancourt's testimony to the Canadian National Citizens' Inquiry is an interesting take on "why", which moves the conversation beyond simple medical negligence or malfeasance, political corruption or cowardice, and straightforward regulatory capture. In geopolitical terms we are but collateral damage in a war for supremacy using global biosecurity as an excuse. Writing letters or ringing pollies will be useless if they have all been told by the military to shut up or else. https://www.bitchute.com/video/3qgZbvcZ5OeB/
I have no particular expertise or experience to assert anything here with anything like authority, and certainly nothing even close to the level of Dr. Rancourt's. I can really only draw from my experience of living for the past half century or so, so my own opinions wallow strictly within the realms of speculation and hypothesis. But Dr Rancourt's testimony and response to the question of "why," as profoundly able, insightful, and authoritative as it is, to my mind is a more fitting answer to the question of "how."
Yes, Denis has been not only an outspoken campaigner, more importantly he and his team have contributed much evidence and effort towards the formulation of the denunciation of those responsible.
"Writing letters or ringing pollies will be useless if they have all been told by the military to shut up or else."
That is precisely the situation. And I'm certain you have recognised that is why official concerns and agencies (such as the TGA) that are, ostensibly, saddled with the responsibility of vetting substances for potential harm, and for supporting health (health profession and practices, the Department of Health and Aged Care, etc., etc.) are so brazenly in dereliction of their duty of care. It's certainly not due to incompetence - it is, undeniably, maliciously criminal intent.
May whatever powers of goodness and justice and compassion that might exist help us all.
Thank-you for sharing. It strikes me as very peculiar that one has to file a freedom of information request on information that should be public. Sounds like a game to me. The tragic part about this is the information that is requested is about health and safety of the public.
Thanks Philip. Very valuable information and appalling that it wasn’t passed. I noticed there were a number of senators that failed to vote on this matter. I suggest that enquiry be made to them by members of their electorates as to why they abstained and what their views are ?
Yes they did, conspicuously absent from the the vote:
The brave Jaquie Lambie Network
& the brave Independents.
100% no show from these guys, their 4 votes could have swung it. So much for holding the major parties to account. I guess excess deaths aren’t a concern for them. 🤷♂️
There is more to this story, don't go praising your favorite opposition politician for voting yes just yet. Except maybe Senator Alex Antic, he is the only one that crossed the floor when it really counted. A pox on all (most) of their houses!
I don’t know where he was at the time of the vote. He might have been on the toilet or missed the bus to work that morning. He was probably in the same place as the rest of his coalition colleagues, maybe they all missed the bus or were car pooling and got stuck in the notorious Canberra traffic. He was there in the afternoon for question time to ask about the cost of living for about 5 minutes and later speak for approximately 15 minute in support of the motion that was eventually tabled on the 24/03/23.
G'day Phillip, the answer(s) as to why we are ALL caught up in this on going scam would be revealed by way of the National Cabinet Documents ( preferably unredacted) which were ORDERED to be released via ANOTHER FOI request by former Senator Rex Patrick in August 2021. The judgement by Justice White makes for very interesting reading & is the main/ common link that ALL Australian's are entitled to see as many, many, bad/evil decisions were & continue to be made from that illegal ( see the judgement) make believe Cabinet. In the following links, Senior Labor members ( Katy Gallagher, Mark Dreyfus) have publicly declared that the judgement is a good thing but have done NOTHING since forming government to follow up on their confected "outrage" re: Morrison's arrogance, blah, blah. It is at this point I respectfully request that you please investigate this important matter further & bring the truth about this dangerous farce into the light. The answers are in those documents, otherwise why are they being withheld by faceless bureaucrats, to this day,contrary to a Federal court judgement? You are doing fantastic work, which quite frankly you shouldn't have to be doing but once in it's all in. Regards Roc
Great stuff Phillip, do you have the name and number of the motion so I can send a Flame Gram to each and every one of the murderous traitor "senators" who want this covered up?
One would wonder why anyone, including our brain-dead senators who voted "NO" to this enquiry, wouldn't want to know WHY we have excess death rates reported by ABS and Insurance Companies, both here and around the world. They must be infected with "Monkey-itis" variant- "Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil"!
Seems like a good idea to print this list. Wouldn’t want to trust it to my memory alone. As well it’s always good to pass on Hard copy...don’t ch reckon.
Agenda 21 is NOT a CONSPIRACY THEORY but a FACT. This is even since Gough Whitlam and his legacy still continues today and that this country is upside down with a broken and full of CORRUPTION system. Read the document and listen to Honourable Ann Bressington
My eyes wide open after studying, listening to seniors, etc, and doing research with the history of this land called Australia with its original Constitution (Magna Carta/Common Law 1900 UK), it tells me with FACT that, quote: "Section V - Powers of Parliament ", actually based on fraudulent acts and without the consent of people, and on top of it, no government but the corporation CIK#0000805157 registered to the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Corporations or business purposes can operate legally in Australia but must be bound by the original constitution (Magna Carta/Common Law) instead of their corporate law rules, and Companies are trying to govern the country and a SOVEREIGN PEOPLE. This is a CRIMINAL action, because it violates the country law, namely Magna Carta / Common Law. Period.
Anyone who disputes or opposes that fact will be classified as committing TREASON.
Agenda 21 is NOT a CONSPIRACY THEORY but a FACT. This is even since Gough Whitlam and his legacy still continues today and that this country is upside down with a broken and full of CORRUPTION system. Read the document and listen to Honourable Ann Bressington
Good work and yes 100% right we are governed b y traitors the same ones who backstabbed the Anzacs and got them to fight unknowingly for Communism ...are the same ones that brought us Conjob 19.
Thanks for providing the link to Hansard, Phillip. We all need to write to the Nayers and ask them to explain themselves. (It was good to see, however, that the vote was THAT CLOSE - a couple of years ago the "bipartisanship" on pandemonium seemed bleaker.) The exposure of government censorship on digital platforms should also make my "save our ABC" friends think twice about how far these tentacles reach into their trusted national broadcaster.
I'm ringing all of the nays and absentees. I will publish their responses. They are all claiming they don't know what is happening and have never heard of the excess deaths. People DESPERATELY need to RING AND EMAIL THESE PEOPLE. This is entirely a partisan exercise and there are cowards and cry bullies everywhere.
You may want to hold off for a bit and have a look into what this motion was and what it wasn't. Hint this motion was not for an inquiry, but there was one and the vote was very different and more like what I would have expected i.e. it was lost by a large majority. I'm writing a post at the moment that explains what happened.
It's pretty clear from the Hansard what it is. "(b) there is a need for further inquiry and scrutiny as to the reasons for these excess deaths, including why dementia and diabetes have seen significant increases in recent years."
The 'nay' staffers are pretending they don't even know about the excess deaths. Watered down or not, the fact that their staffers don't even want to acknowledge the excess deaths is revealing. Think about where we were 6 months ago. The fact that Lib are even voting for an inquiry is astounding given their ties with Pfizer. I'm publishing it.
I have personally spoken with Greens Sen Jordon Steele John several times over the past 18 months. He is responsible for the Health portfolio for the Greens. I can assure you his staff KNOW there are excess deaths. His staff are mostly very young, very well meaning, personally insecure and terrified of losing the moral high ground. They seek refuge in the idea that excess deaths are due to Covid and long-Covid. They fear that any inquiry into excess deaths will take the focus away from The Voice Referendum and Climate Change. This is all that I can surmise.
Bingo. I had a rather different conversation with a senior staffer - I won't break journalistic confidentiality but they know there are excess deaths and are concerned.
There is a action, called a cover-upper which covers UP the roll outs of the RF Radiation, of first telegraph, WORLD WIDE Ship to Shore Communications RADAR System, by first the USA.INC Military Into-dust-ya'll Complex, 1918 than AM, and FM, than Microwave, than dish, and Sell-u-LIAR de-VICES!
Covered by the RESEARCHED "Invisible Rainbow," here....
https://betterness.com/wp-content/uploads/TheInvisibleRainbow.pdf
And the USA.INC DBA, the US NAVY Rearched Institute.... here......
https://www.stetzerelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Naval-Medical-Research-Institute-1972-Full-Bibliography.pdf
And please don't think that they'ed, love you to THINK... as ALL of the Above are in 200 PLUS Countries, including "Aussie LAND," here...
https://famguardian.org/Publications/SilentWeaponsQuietWars/Silent-Weapons-for-Quiet-Wars-The-Lawful-Path.pdf
It's not as clear as you think. What was the actual motion? Check Hansard the day before (23/3/23) and you'll see what a motion proposing a committee be established looks like. The motion 24/3/23 is not what you think it is, it's just an empty request for acknowledgement.
It's no more like Pauline Hanson's "it's OK to be white" motion.
Ok, but they aren't even acknowledging it (reality). We can nit pick but that doesn't win wars. I'm still going to hold them to account. My article will be very revealing about what is going on behind the scenes.
Edit: would you mind linking the previous motion?
You'll have to read Hansard there is no fancy graphic if you want to verify. It sort of steals the thunder of the post I'm about to write. Here is a link to how they voted 23/3/23.
https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/senate/2023-03-23/2
Edit: Hansard is on this page if you want to verity the unofficial site.
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansards/26448/&sid=0000
I've gone through the lists of votes for/against both (a) the Roberts motion for an investigation into the WHO+amendments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfiwYAF1SMU and (b) this excess deaths inquiry. Lambie & Tyrrell voted YES for the WHOinq but abstained from DeathsInq; D.Pocock & Thorpe voted NO for the WHOinq but abstained from DeathsInq. There were seven other Senators missing from the WHOinq vote (4 LNP: Birmingham, Brockman, O'Sullivan, Hughes) + 3 Labor: Ayres, Farrell, Gallagher) and six Senators missing from the DeathsInq vote (3 LNP: Cadell, Reynolds, Hume; 3 Labor: Smith, Sterle, Watt) plus the four abstentions mentioned above. All of those in LNP need to be asked why they were absent from these important votes, as well as the four abstainers who are purportedly meant to keep the bastards honest. Are the numbers of people present at these votes being rigged?
The vote mentioned in this post are not the votes for the forming of a committee to investigate excess deaths. This vote was the after party. The "real vote" happened the day before and the coalition heroes don't look so heroic (except maybe Antic). When asked to vote on something more substantial like an "actual inquiry" rather than just an "acknowledgment" they towed the party line or just did a no show.
Wow, talk about smoke and mirrors! I was getting ready to thank the LNP Senators who voted yes. How depressing! Maybe we need to ask those who absented themselves for some accountability too - 51% turnout is abominable. Hopefully it means some Senators know full well the obscenity going down, aren't supportive of it, but are too scared to say so.
So was I, but part of it smelt fishy.
The coalition were in government at the time why would they want to investigate themselves?
Why no terms of reference in the motion?
Why wouldn’t Labor want to capitalize on a coalition failing?
It didn’t make sense to me.
The vote on 23/3/23 makes perfect sense. A big fat NO.
We are in the time of sunshine patriots (the libs who voted yes late in the piece). We still need them. Puritanism won't get us anywhere but we can still have long memories about whom to trust.
I still can't find this "before" vote with wording. I'm not a Hansard expert so struggling. The only thing I see on the link you gave me is this: The PRESIDENT (Senator the Hon. Sue Lines ) took the chair at 09:00, made an acknowledgement of country and read prayers https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansards/26448/&sid=0000
And nothing relevant in the dropdown menus (but likely that's due to my ignorance of the platform). Are you able to link the exact vote you are talking about?
Feel free to use as much (or as little) as you like from this post:
https://krap.substack.com/p/australian-senate-votes-not-to-investigate
https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/senate/2023-03-23/2
Page 27 of 99 in the official Hansard pdf I think from memory.
Click RHS +committees if you’re on a laptop and looking at the parliamentry website.
Great, thanks.
I've had a look at the preceding day's vote as per Ivo's substack: only 6 from LNP (apart from Antic) showed up to vote that day and they all voted No, ie, at least 22 LNP were no shows; Lambie & Tyrrell also didn't show. Seems like the deck was obviously stacked in advance so that the other supportive LNPers didn't bother to come (Rennick & Canavan). The next day most of those absent LNPers showed up and voted Yes to the toothless motion; did they already know it would be defeated?
The first vote was never going to get through given how it was worded. imo Babbit went too hard the first time around. I have spoken to a lot of people today. Given that it's about politics and the committee in the first vote was designed badly, it was never going to get up. The wording of the second vote was much better in order to get people on side. This was not 'stacked.' It was just designed badly and he was told to go back to the drawing board.
We who are immersed in these data need to understand that most of the staffers don't even know about the excess deaths or why this is an issue. I'll be writing a piece on this. I can't say a lot due to confidentiality, but the most important thing I can say is that people need to ring and email their senators. They have no idea what is going on. They have next to no interaction with the public.
Wow, thanks for this insight. I'm never sure whether they are pretending not to know or whether they amazingly have no idea.
Is it best to focus on Senators from my state or do Senators from other states take notice? Look forward to your article to circulate too.
You are very welcome. It was hard going yesterday. I would focus on the senators in your state first. Ring them and tell them how you feel, then ask for their email addresses as a follow up. Great work, this is the activism that is desperately needed. Some humble advice, you will have to stick to the facts and not let emotion get in the way. The staffers have no idea what is happening, have never heard of the issue.
Edit: senators from 'other' states definitely take notice. I rang all around the country.
Love your work !!
Excuses..... of the those who just LOOK like the "care" for THEIR underlings....
"but OFFICER, I didn't know the SYRINGE was LOADED, with patented poison potions," so, I'm sorry all them people DIED or were PERMANENTLY DISABLED!
Can't blame me, I was watching sports!
"We all need to write to the Nayers and ask them to explain themselves."
The threadbare platitude "the pen is mightier than the sword." And what, pray tell, do you hope to achieve by us doing so? Will the criminals who are responsible for this (all of parliament, all politicians, the entire government bureaucracy and apparatus, the judges and the courts and all the quisling establishment institutions, the corporate employers and their career lackeys) be subjected to swift, severe justice? Will the injured be healed? Will the dead be brought back to life?
Every one of them - on both sides, and the so-called independents, of this sham pantomime of a parliament, in this charade of a counterfeit democracy - ushered COVID-19 (the pathogen, the Psy-Op and propaganda, the "Pandemic Emergency Response," and of course, the diabolical bioweapon masquerading as a "vaccine" for which all of the preceding was a pretext for - the whole execrable lot) into the country and onto us, and then beat, compelled, and in so many ways coerced so many into rolling-up the sleeve and taking the diabolical injections, and at this irretrievably late stage you are still advocating writing letters?
" ... (It was good to see, however, that the vote was THAT CLOSE - a couple of years ago the "bipartisanship" on pandemonium seemed bleaker.) "
In order for the fiction of rule of law and democracy to keep the stupid cattle (that's how these politicians and their corporate-owner bosses consider the people) believing the our world is not completely managed and controlled by the public-private stakeholders (i.e. the corporate-owner bosses), government must allow a few "I speak for the people!" voices to become prominent. This is what we have here with G. Rennick, M. Roberts, and P. Hanson. Quite frankly, it is foolish beyond words to believe that the vote was nothing more than a cynical burlesque. The result was per-determined, of course, and the intention was to keep fools believing that the system is working and the political tide is turning.
It is not.
Thanks for the explosion. I tend to agree after the discussion which followed my initial comment (the one that you reacted to, perhaps before reading the rest?) It does seem like a token gesture/pantomime to conceal the totalitarian underbelly, and letters will just be binned.
Which makes me wonder about the other "vote" after Malcolm Roberts' motion to inquire about WHO+IHR changes. Was there a vote which preceded that "narrowly defeated" (30Y/32N) motion, similar to the one that Ivo has revealed in his latest substack?
And here's my futile hope: Perhaps when you meet someone who is "resisting" but not so strongly as you advocate, you could be more patient with your responses rather than dumping your justifiable anger and sardonic wit onto that "foolish beyond words" nitwit?
Yes, I should move on, but it bothers me that I may have been too submissive in my apology. Accordingly I'd like to point out that while I am sincere about my apology with regards to impugning your first comment and disregarding the rest in which your opinion and your posture on the matters discussed evolved as the thread lengthened, I am still resolutely standing behind my words and the content of my comment. I take none of those points back, nor will I deny the asperity with which I made them.
What I do especially regret is if the appearance it gave was of being an attack on you personally, which would have been absurd of me since I do not know you at all. I hope you will be able to accept that it was not intended as an ad hominem or in any way a calumny.
Oh, and you're most definitely not a ... thing that you said, your last word.
I've always had my doubts - I'm sure most have - and there has ever been reason to be sceptical and critical about it, but with COVID-19, the curtains have parted and we should have all seen the system and how it truly works (and more importantly, for whom) more clearly than ever. Once seen, there can be no denial, and it becomes not only irresponsible in doing, but we become accessory to criminality.
Apologies are in order - and I do apologise, unreservedly.
There is nothing to excuse my behaviour. I read your initial comment a day or so ago, and have been stewing like a ... well, a stew. I'll try to behave, and at least hold-off responding until I've read the entre thread, or allowed the conversation to develop perhaps with some of my own input to steer it before it strays too far from my preferred viewpoint.
No worries. The final ten minutes of Denis Rancourt's testimony to the Canadian National Citizens' Inquiry is an interesting take on "why", which moves the conversation beyond simple medical negligence or malfeasance, political corruption or cowardice, and straightforward regulatory capture. In geopolitical terms we are but collateral damage in a war for supremacy using global biosecurity as an excuse. Writing letters or ringing pollies will be useless if they have all been told by the military to shut up or else. https://www.bitchute.com/video/3qgZbvcZ5OeB/
I have no particular expertise or experience to assert anything here with anything like authority, and certainly nothing even close to the level of Dr. Rancourt's. I can really only draw from my experience of living for the past half century or so, so my own opinions wallow strictly within the realms of speculation and hypothesis. But Dr Rancourt's testimony and response to the question of "why," as profoundly able, insightful, and authoritative as it is, to my mind is a more fitting answer to the question of "how."
Thanks so much.
Yes, Denis has been not only an outspoken campaigner, more importantly he and his team have contributed much evidence and effort towards the formulation of the denunciation of those responsible.
"Writing letters or ringing pollies will be useless if they have all been told by the military to shut up or else."
That is precisely the situation. And I'm certain you have recognised that is why official concerns and agencies (such as the TGA) that are, ostensibly, saddled with the responsibility of vetting substances for potential harm, and for supporting health (health profession and practices, the Department of Health and Aged Care, etc., etc.) are so brazenly in dereliction of their duty of care. It's certainly not due to incompetence - it is, undeniably, maliciously criminal intent.
May whatever powers of goodness and justice and compassion that might exist help us all.
Amen !
Thank-you for sharing. It strikes me as very peculiar that one has to file a freedom of information request on information that should be public. Sounds like a game to me. The tragic part about this is the information that is requested is about health and safety of the public.
Thanks Philip. Very valuable information and appalling that it wasn’t passed. I noticed there were a number of senators that failed to vote on this matter. I suggest that enquiry be made to them by members of their electorates as to why they abstained and what their views are ?
Thank you Phillip.
So they voted along party lines -
* all the NO votes belong to Labor and Greens senators,
* all the YES votes are Liberal, Country Liberal, Nationals, One Nation and United Australia.
Interesting!
There are a lot of disgraceful creatures supposedly representing all of us!
Yes they did, conspicuously absent from the the vote:
The brave Jaquie Lambie Network
& the brave Independents.
100% no show from these guys, their 4 votes could have swung it. So much for holding the major parties to account. I guess excess deaths aren’t a concern for them. 🤷♂️
They're a disgrace, aren't they!
There is more to this story, don't go praising your favorite opposition politician for voting yes just yet. Except maybe Senator Alex Antic, he is the only one that crossed the floor when it really counted. A pox on all (most) of their houses!
I wonder where our Gerard Rennick was that day...or did I miss something?
I don’t know where he was at the time of the vote. He might have been on the toilet or missed the bus to work that morning. He was probably in the same place as the rest of his coalition colleagues, maybe they all missed the bus or were car pooling and got stuck in the notorious Canberra traffic. He was there in the afternoon for question time to ask about the cost of living for about 5 minutes and later speak for approximately 15 minute in support of the motion that was eventually tabled on the 24/03/23.
G'day Phillip, the answer(s) as to why we are ALL caught up in this on going scam would be revealed by way of the National Cabinet Documents ( preferably unredacted) which were ORDERED to be released via ANOTHER FOI request by former Senator Rex Patrick in August 2021. The judgement by Justice White makes for very interesting reading & is the main/ common link that ALL Australian's are entitled to see as many, many, bad/evil decisions were & continue to be made from that illegal ( see the judgement) make believe Cabinet. In the following links, Senior Labor members ( Katy Gallagher, Mark Dreyfus) have publicly declared that the judgement is a good thing but have done NOTHING since forming government to follow up on their confected "outrage" re: Morrison's arrogance, blah, blah. It is at this point I respectfully request that you please investigate this important matter further & bring the truth about this dangerous farce into the light. The answers are in those documents, otherwise why are they being withheld by faceless bureaucrats, to this day,contrary to a Federal court judgement? You are doing fantastic work, which quite frankly you shouldn't have to be doing but once in it's all in. Regards Roc
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/secrecy-laws-don-t-apply-to-national-cabinet-judge-20210805-p58g9n
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/aug/05/rex-patrick-wins-foi-case-to-release-national-cabinet-records
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/veps2dasxxg8z4z/AACJ_tJrlPtgVPao5DVSvAmva?dl=0&utm_campaign=news&utm_medium=miragenews&utm_source=miragenews
Great stuff Phillip, do you have the name and number of the motion so I can send a Flame Gram to each and every one of the murderous traitor "senators" who want this covered up?
One would wonder why anyone, including our brain-dead senators who voted "NO" to this enquiry, wouldn't want to know WHY we have excess death rates reported by ABS and Insurance Companies, both here and around the world. They must be infected with "Monkey-itis" variant- "Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil"!
Yes, more like "hear no heterodoxies, speak no heterodoxies, see no inconvenient evidence"
PS
Seems like a good idea to print this list. Wouldn’t want to trust it to my memory alone. As well it’s always good to pass on Hard copy...don’t ch reckon.
Thank you Phillip. God willing this will be shared many times.
Thankyou.
Excellent post, I immediately shared on Twitter. Well done
Thank you so so so so much i am just going home now to work more on it. I love driving the bus but sometimes it does get in the way of writing
Wow so much closer than I expected, yes good idea to email the nays and ask why
Thank you for all this information.
3 to 5 years expectancy, it's already dead, and many more dying for the jab kill shot.
Then lets continue until our last breath.....God will use us for His Will.
Great Seal of Australia are TREASON
Agenda 21 is NOT a CONSPIRACY THEORY but a FACT. This is even since Gough Whitlam and his legacy still continues today and that this country is upside down with a broken and full of CORRUPTION system. Read the document and listen to Honourable Ann Bressington
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10229657779139403&id=1552033107&mibextid=qC1gEaGreat Seal of Australia are TREASON
My eyes wide open after studying, listening to seniors, etc, and doing research with the history of this land called Australia with its original Constitution (Magna Carta/Common Law 1900 UK), it tells me with FACT that, quote: "Section V - Powers of Parliament ", actually based on fraudulent acts and without the consent of people, and on top of it, no government but the corporation CIK#0000805157 registered to the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Corporations or business purposes can operate legally in Australia but must be bound by the original constitution (Magna Carta/Common Law) instead of their corporate law rules, and Companies are trying to govern the country and a SOVEREIGN PEOPLE. This is a CRIMINAL action, because it violates the country law, namely Magna Carta / Common Law. Period.
Anyone who disputes or opposes that fact will be classified as committing TREASON.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10229697441330933&id=1552033107&mibextid=qC1gEa
Agenda 21 is NOT a CONSPIRACY THEORY but a FACT. This is even since Gough Whitlam and his legacy still continues today and that this country is upside down with a broken and full of CORRUPTION system. Read the document and listen to Honourable Ann Bressington
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10229657779139403&id=1552033107&mibextid=qC1gEa
Good work and yes 100% right we are governed b y traitors the same ones who backstabbed the Anzacs and got them to fight unknowingly for Communism ...are the same ones that brought us Conjob 19.
True enough...." Forward boldly "!
Blessings to you and yours.
even curiouser, look at their yes/no intentions on the coming referndum.