Respectfully, language is important. No one is 'forcing' the Australian government to cheat and decieve. They are criminals, doing this willingly, colluding with the US DOD, tech and media to whitewash.
By saying they government was 'forced' makes them victims in the process. They are not being 'forced' to commit democide, treason, and trampling on our rights. They ARE committing democide, treason and trampling on our rights.
Edit: Thank you to Dr Sy for his analysis. I will be posting this on my article, where I keep a ledger of the excess deaths. ABS just released excess deaths for May 2023 and they were +15% above baseline. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australian-excess-deaths-2023
Australian government is one of the world's most corrupt. They have largely been bought by the WEF/Globalists to support their mass depopulation program. But at least for them we can foretell the future. Rev 21:8 But the cowardly, abominable, murderers, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."
That is one of my favourite passages. Note that 'cowards' are listed first. I think that was intentional, and I call on all co-Christians hiding in their lukewarm churches to take heed.
If the ABS manipulates excess deaths data to accommodate the narrative being dictated by the government, bureaucracy and pharmaceutical establishment, that will not change the underlying reality.
For example, the life insurance industry needs to know what is really going on in order to set appropriate life and disability insurance premiums on which insurance company competitiveness, profitability and survival depend.
Regardless of the ABS data, life insurance industry statisticians and actuaries will figure out what is really going on.
In his book, "Cause Unknown - The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022", Ed Dowd makes numerous references to publicly available insurance industry data and to publications of The Society of Actuaries Research Institute.
The share prices of insurance companies - and thus the bonuses of insurance industry executives - depend on Wall Street and other analysts having access to this data - so, any attempts to suppress it - by governments, the pharmaceutical industry or other potentially afflicted and/or conflicted parties - are destined to fail.
The same applies to independent statistical data generated by funeral, crematorium and cemetery services.
No one has a monopoly on information . Those who deceive and obfuscate will be exposed.
The 30:29 was not the vote for the enquiry. The vote for setting up an enquiry vote was defeated 35:4 from memory, with some conspicuous “heroes missing in action”. 30:29 was the later vote for “acknowledgment” of excess deaths. Guess who the 4 were?
Thanks for the mention in your article, I did see it, much appreciated. It is an uphill battle by Sen Babet and I’m disappointed by the other senators that played politics with his proposal, especially Sen Rennick who has been championing the adverse effects in the senate. Maybe he missed the bus on the day or got caught in the Canberra traffic or maybe he was just sitting on the shitter and couldn’t make the vote. Who knows 🤷♂️ Maybe, he just knew it was a futile vote and decided to abstain so as not upset his party. Essentially the motion had no chance of success unless one of the two major parties supported it and there was zero chance of that happening so in the end his vote would not have made a difference. Only Antic chose to vote against the party line which I find surprising/interesting. Maybe his seat is not in danger or he doesn’t care and just voted his conscience. Either way he was the only one from the majors that voted for the inquiry.
Wilson thank you so much for a great article that clearly shows the manipulation of data to suit a certain narrative. All I can say is the people doing this know exactly what is going on!
It is also important to emphasise that “all deaths” Covid or not should be investigated as Wilson clearly states in his article “Because COVID-19 deaths are poorly defined scientifically by the PCR test”. I think Wilson was being very diplomatic with his words and I implore both Wilson and Dr Altman to take a deep dive into these tests.
If anyone has looked into this test - PCR, they will know that this test is NOT diagnostic.
PCR tests for a fragment of the alleged virus SARS-CoV-2 an in-silico genomic sequence.
It does not test for the disease Covid 19.
It does not test for Covid 19 infection.
There is no evidence/proof that part or all of this alleged virus causes any illness, let alone Covid (cold/flu symptoms) so to label the cause of death as ‘Covid’ based on a positive result is disingenuous and fraudulent. People died with a positive test for a fragment, this fragment can be and was found on people with no symptoms (they coined this asymptomatic carriers).
It was also acknowledged publicly in the mainstream news that people died ‘WITH Covid’ (even this is misleading, as they actually died with a fragment of the computer generated SARS-CoV-2 virus). To be factually correct it should be ‘they died WITH part of the alleged SARS-CoV-2” - yet they continue to label ABS deaths as ‘Covid deaths’ - due to Covid. This must stop.
Essentially this is equivalent to saying that anyone who has died in the last two years and was ‘vaccinated’ should be labeled as a ‘vaccine death’ - i.e. they died with fragments of the injection. How ironic is this, as it may well be true unlike their fake Covid death narrative!
🌏⛓ “The Social Credit System is a dictatorial tool that is deeply discriminatory and violates fundamental human as well as civil rights. It is the inverse of a democracy.”
‘Effects of Unregulated Digitalization on Health and Democracy’
Respectfully, language is important. No one is 'forcing' the Australian government to cheat and decieve. They are criminals, doing this willingly, colluding with the US DOD, tech and media to whitewash.
By saying they government was 'forced' makes them victims in the process. They are not being 'forced' to commit democide, treason, and trampling on our rights. They ARE committing democide, treason and trampling on our rights.
Edit: Thank you to Dr Sy for his analysis. I will be posting this on my article, where I keep a ledger of the excess deaths. ABS just released excess deaths for May 2023 and they were +15% above baseline. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australian-excess-deaths-2023
May the perpetrators be brought to justice.
EDAU you are absolutely right .
We have to call this what it is. No mincing of words. Intentional democide.
Daily reminder that Mark McGowan is going to BHP.
Never forget.
I hope these politicians and bureaucrats are panicked and worried - for the rest of their lives
Every lie requires another and another.
Australian government is one of the world's most corrupt. They have largely been bought by the WEF/Globalists to support their mass depopulation program. But at least for them we can foretell the future. Rev 21:8 But the cowardly, abominable, murderers, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."
That is one of my favourite passages. Note that 'cowards' are listed first. I think that was intentional, and I call on all co-Christians hiding in their lukewarm churches to take heed.
If the ABS manipulates excess deaths data to accommodate the narrative being dictated by the government, bureaucracy and pharmaceutical establishment, that will not change the underlying reality.
For example, the life insurance industry needs to know what is really going on in order to set appropriate life and disability insurance premiums on which insurance company competitiveness, profitability and survival depend.
Regardless of the ABS data, life insurance industry statisticians and actuaries will figure out what is really going on.
In his book, "Cause Unknown - The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022", Ed Dowd makes numerous references to publicly available insurance industry data and to publications of The Society of Actuaries Research Institute.
The share prices of insurance companies - and thus the bonuses of insurance industry executives - depend on Wall Street and other analysts having access to this data - so, any attempts to suppress it - by governments, the pharmaceutical industry or other potentially afflicted and/or conflicted parties - are destined to fail.
The same applies to independent statistical data generated by funeral, crematorium and cemetery services.
No one has a monopoly on information . Those who deceive and obfuscate will be exposed.
The truth will out.
The 30:29 was not the vote for the enquiry. The vote for setting up an enquiry vote was defeated 35:4 from memory, with some conspicuous “heroes missing in action”. 30:29 was the later vote for “acknowledgment” of excess deaths. Guess who the 4 were?
I acknowledged your Vote 1/Vote 2 clarification in my article with a tag. Hope you saw that. I have a slightly different take but it's an important distinction that you brought up nonetheless, and shows Sen Babet's uphill efforts https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australian-senate-rejects-and-obfuscates
Thanks for the mention in your article, I did see it, much appreciated. It is an uphill battle by Sen Babet and I’m disappointed by the other senators that played politics with his proposal, especially Sen Rennick who has been championing the adverse effects in the senate. Maybe he missed the bus on the day or got caught in the Canberra traffic or maybe he was just sitting on the shitter and couldn’t make the vote. Who knows 🤷♂️ Maybe, he just knew it was a futile vote and decided to abstain so as not upset his party. Essentially the motion had no chance of success unless one of the two major parties supported it and there was zero chance of that happening so in the end his vote would not have made a difference. Only Antic chose to vote against the party line which I find surprising/interesting. Maybe his seat is not in danger or he doesn’t care and just voted his conscience. Either way he was the only one from the majors that voted for the inquiry.
Same dodgy accountants used that managed to put us into a federal surplus this year?
The "politicians" are PUPPETS AND USEFUL IDIOTS!
Either they are threatened or massively bribed.
I hope they will burn in hell or at least procecuted and given SEVERE punishments, preferred death penalty!
I wish all Australians have justice served to them. It is important to have all people rise up and say they are not going to take this anymore.
Wilson thank you so much for a great article that clearly shows the manipulation of data to suit a certain narrative. All I can say is the people doing this know exactly what is going on!
It is also important to emphasise that “all deaths” Covid or not should be investigated as Wilson clearly states in his article “Because COVID-19 deaths are poorly defined scientifically by the PCR test”. I think Wilson was being very diplomatic with his words and I implore both Wilson and Dr Altman to take a deep dive into these tests.
If anyone has looked into this test - PCR, they will know that this test is NOT diagnostic.
PCR tests for a fragment of the alleged virus SARS-CoV-2 an in-silico genomic sequence.
It does not test for the disease Covid 19.
It does not test for Covid 19 infection.
There is no evidence/proof that part or all of this alleged virus causes any illness, let alone Covid (cold/flu symptoms) so to label the cause of death as ‘Covid’ based on a positive result is disingenuous and fraudulent. People died with a positive test for a fragment, this fragment can be and was found on people with no symptoms (they coined this asymptomatic carriers).
It was also acknowledged publicly in the mainstream news that people died ‘WITH Covid’ (even this is misleading, as they actually died with a fragment of the computer generated SARS-CoV-2 virus). To be factually correct it should be ‘they died WITH part of the alleged SARS-CoV-2” - yet they continue to label ABS deaths as ‘Covid deaths’ - due to Covid. This must stop.
Essentially this is equivalent to saying that anyone who has died in the last two years and was ‘vaccinated’ should be labeled as a ‘vaccine death’ - i.e. they died with fragments of the injection. How ironic is this, as it may well be true unlike their fake Covid death narrative!
🌏⛓ “The Social Credit System is a dictatorial tool that is deeply discriminatory and violates fundamental human as well as civil rights. It is the inverse of a democracy.”
‘Effects of Unregulated Digitalization on Health and Democracy’
World Council for Health (August 2023)
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Unregulated-Digitalization.pdf