In the interest of accuracy, I must clarify and correct my previous Substack of today regarding the legal status and implication of Dr. Bay's Application to the High Court of Australia
Peter, I am not perfect. I've never claimed to be perfect. After over 3 years of work on Covid almost full time, I have never misinformed anyone on anything. My oversight was corrected within minutes. I'm sorry you feel my reputation has been damaged beyond repair. I'm sure you have never made such an error.
John Moore Wangaratta Vic. I have just started a petition on change.org titled QANTAS – REMOVE ALL SUPPORT OF THE YES VOTE IN THE VOICE REFERENDUM - MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. With the view of getting Qantas to remove its endorsement of the Yes vote for the Voice to Parliament. With the aim it will pull the carpet out from under the Yes vote and other companies might follow.
Indeed, wondered same myself, first impression was that the judge refused to hear his complaint. He seemed convinced that unless the court explicitly approved the current referendum wording it was unconstitutional - even quoted the sections he’s basing his comments on. But ‘on its face’ as legal types are heard to say, I thought ‘well, that just means the judge won’t even hear his complaint & he needs to appeal that first’ ...
Phillip, you really need to be more diligent in fact-checking claims before you publish them on your substack! 😠
If you want people to believe your stories you cannot afford to make such blatant misinformation claims. I am afraid you have just damaged your credibility, as far as I am concerned, beyond repair.
You might like to check the following so that you are correctly informed.
We are human. We have to make decisions on far less than complete information every day of our lives. We sift and collate and correlate and weigh and balance. Do YOU always do better? "Let he who is without sin throw the first stone".
Thank you. I knew it was too good to be true and investigated myself. Why didn't everyone else look at William's link and see the stamp on the document and look up what the codes meant? It was pretty basic. So easy to get excited and trust. I do understand and sincerely very much appreciate all the work you do and have done beyond words. However, I have been waiting for an intelligent academic professional as yourself to write something so others would listen to me.
What we believe we will conceive. The cumulative energy of the people can collapse the despicables' universe. I choose to believe it is 'already done' and so should every good freedom fighter. Not sure what I am talking about? There's a short free e-book at www.mindjoga.com x
Peter, I am not perfect. I've never claimed to be perfect. After over 3 years of work on Covid almost full time, I have never misinformed anyone on anything. My oversight was corrected within minutes. I'm sorry you feel my reputation has been damaged beyond repair. I'm sure you have never made such an error.
Thank you Phillip.
You are human, just like the rest of us. To correct it so swifly and with such raw honesty will, in my mind, no do your reputation any harm.
I apppreciate your substacks.
Let's now hope for some good news in the not too distant future.
John Moore Wangaratta Vic. I have just started a petition on change.org titled QANTAS – REMOVE ALL SUPPORT OF THE YES VOTE IN THE VOICE REFERENDUM - MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. With the view of getting Qantas to remove its endorsement of the Yes vote for the Voice to Parliament. With the aim it will pull the carpet out from under the Yes vote and other companies might follow.
I would value it if you could promote the petition. It can be viewed and signed at https://www.change.org/p/qantas-remove-all-support-of-the-yes-vote-in-the-voice-referendum-mind-your-own-business
I doubt that anyone has more experience than me, when it comes to jumping the gun Phillip.
Apology accepted .
No worries! Thanks for correcting!
All good Phillip, I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken.🤣
Indeed, wondered same myself, first impression was that the judge refused to hear his complaint. He seemed convinced that unless the court explicitly approved the current referendum wording it was unconstitutional - even quoted the sections he’s basing his comments on. But ‘on its face’ as legal types are heard to say, I thought ‘well, that just means the judge won’t even hear his complaint & he needs to appeal that first’ ...
Thanks for clarification ,,, like yourself , and on reflection-
my ‘ approachable barrister remarked on this story in the ‘ negative ....saying as you have said here
Phillip, you really need to be more diligent in fact-checking claims before you publish them on your substack! 😠
If you want people to believe your stories you cannot afford to make such blatant misinformation claims. I am afraid you have just damaged your credibility, as far as I am concerned, beyond repair.
You might like to check the following so that you are correctly informed.
https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/high-court-claim-misleads-on-power-of-the-voice/
At least you had the courage to correct your error, even though you did not present the facts clearly, I suspect deliberately.
Peter
Seriously !!
Give yourself an uppercut champ
I strongly suspect Phillip has more courage and truth in his little finger than yourself.
Good one Pete, go & vote YES & keep on following AAP for the "truth."😜🤣
We are human. We have to make decisions on far less than complete information every day of our lives. We sift and collate and correlate and weigh and balance. Do YOU always do better? "Let he who is without sin throw the first stone".
The pulpit of the pompous pecksniffian knows no limits. God, haven't we had enough of that in the last 3 years.
https://constitutionwatch.com.au/parliamentary-research-brief-voice-referendum-question-may-be-constitutionally-invalid-for-misleading-and-misinforming-voters/
Thank you. I knew it was too good to be true and investigated myself. Why didn't everyone else look at William's link and see the stamp on the document and look up what the codes meant? It was pretty basic. So easy to get excited and trust. I do understand and sincerely very much appreciate all the work you do and have done beyond words. However, I have been waiting for an intelligent academic professional as yourself to write something so others would listen to me.
Josephine Cashman presents the facts https://josephinecashman.substack.com/p/the-australian-population-faces-a
Well Dr Bay was on CFO last night and answered his critics- I don’t really understand it, but he still feels confident.
https://rumble.com/v3flwqn-billy-is-coming-back-a-cafe-locked-out-special.html
What we believe we will conceive. The cumulative energy of the people can collapse the despicables' universe. I choose to believe it is 'already done' and so should every good freedom fighter. Not sure what I am talking about? There's a short free e-book at www.mindjoga.com x
I am totally confused as to why anyone gives Bay the time of day.
A rare man of integrity it is so rare to hear an apology Almighty God gives GRACE to the humble but the proud He views from afar