31 Comments

🇦🇺⚖️ Thank you for posting this information in your Substack, Dr Altman. Other Australian law firms I found include Burke Mead Lawyers, LexisNexis, and Hall Payne Lawyers. The Faculty of Law at Oxford University has even taken an interest, and here provides a breakdown on compensation concerning dependent children: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/nofault-compensation-schemes-for-covid-19-vaccines/australia-covid-vaccine-nfcs

Expand full comment

Meanwhile, in the US, the American Association of Retired Persons is reported to be encouraging its almost 38 million members to continue - with an 8th jab:

https://open.substack.com/pub/alexberenson/p/the-aarp-just-told-its-38-million?r=20pd6j&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Expand full comment

Presumably the effwits / opportunists who run the ‘American Association of Retired Persons’ want to accelerate the collapse of the association’s membership (by speeding up the departure of the members from their earthly lives). Somebody in America needs to have a close look at the people who ‘manage’ this organisation.

A not unrelated useful concept that helps explain what is generally going on with people in powerful positions who are cashing in on the effects of the Covid disaster is that of ‘Ponerology’ – or more precisely - ‘Political Ponerology’ - a concept developed by the late Polish psychiatrist Andrzej Łobaczewski (1921-2007).

Lobaczewski was the original author of the book “Political Ponerology: The Science of Evil, Psychopathy, and the Origins of Totalitarianism”. He saw it all as he lived through the Nazi occupation of Poland and then the post-War communist era. His obituary makes an interesting read:

https://www.sott.net/article/159686-In-Memoriam-Andrzej-M-obaczewski

The descriptor for the book states: “The first manuscript of this book was thrown into the fire just minutes before a secret police raid in Communist Poland. The second copy was personally delivered to a contact inside the Vatican, only to mysteriously vanish. The third was pieced together in 1980s New York by the last surviving member of an underground research team, only to be banned from publication...”. The book was reconstructed, rewritten, and republished only two years ago – you will find it on Amazon - but it is not an easy read.

One aspect of Lobaczewski’s ideas is that sociopathic & psychopathic individuals very often rise up the hierarchical ranks of organisations (corporations, governments, associations, etc.) to achieve positions of power, and their lack of human empathy and ethical restraint then drives self-serving ruthless or dishonest behaviour that often follows. In retrospect, I saw aspects of this phenomenon during the years I worked in the corporate world - but back then I could never understand why it was happening. Harrison Koehli has a Substack (‘Political Ponerology’) devoted to analysing the topic.

Expand full comment

Yes, the AARP is most certainly misrepresenting its members.

The trickle-down corruption and conflicts of interest holding all this together, right across the board, are profound.

Thank you for the link on Lobaczewski. I hadn’t heard of him. It will interesting for me to compare his thoughts to psychiatrist Joost Merloo, also a survivor of Nazi occupation.

In respect to the hi-tech totalitarianism in the making, I would have to agree with holocaust survivor Vera Sharav, when she states in this one minute clip that too much emphasis in education is given to the study of science over that of the humanities: https://fb.watch/pu1fu308q7/?

Expand full comment

AFTER!!! they are all punished.. They can't buy us off - they must pay for the worst atrocity ` ever inflicted on the Australian men and women. There is a special hell for these slime..

Expand full comment

The TGA provisionally approved the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ to PREVENT covid (TGA Public Assessment Report January 2021). When it spectacularly did not PREVENT covid, why wasn’t it removed from circulation?

Expand full comment

Spot on ... “provisional approval for ... active immunisation to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2, in individuals 16 years of age or older”.

All off the back of “short term” efficacy and safety data with no real world evidence at all of immunity.

I challenged several people throughout 2021 and into 2022 with this point and received blank stares and acrimony in return ... but as Julian Gillespie and others found out when attempting to take on the corrupt establishment, it matters not what the lie is but how much clinical chaff can be thrown around it to obscure it from public scrutiny.

Expand full comment

I’m hearing ya… I’ve written to the TGA asking them that very question, but I just get directed to ‘govt links’ that have no bearing on the question. There’s a great ATAGI document on ‘the omicron variant and the timing of booster doses’ Dec 2021. It cans the first 2 doses in the first paragraph (to justify the boosters), and I Quote, ‘two doses of vaccine did not provide any significant protection against Sars-cov-2 due to the Omicron variant.’ Further, the very last sentence of the document says, and I quote, ‘there is little evidence on the incremental benefit of booster doses in protecting against severe disease or reducing onward transmission of sars-cov-2 and on the duration of protection provided by covid 19 booster doses.’ This document refers to the MANDATORY ‘vaccines’ that you lose your job if you don’t take…. I’ve certainly tried to use this as a ‘reasonable’ excuse for refusing booster shots, in my work place, but work cover deem it ‘reasonable management action’ to mandate such useless products- useless by the admission of ATAGI themselves!!! Go figure 🤡

Expand full comment

I have that exact document, and the contemporaneous one about the kids 5-11. I showed these to colleagues, friends, spouses of friends etc and with very few exceptions was ignored. I recall WA implementing its extreme vaccine mandates for “Omicron” around the exact week that ATAGI showed no efficacy for Omicron in ~mid Oct 2021 ... all absolute insane clown world indeed!

Expand full comment

Thank you Phillip.

My most pressing question remains, why are we allowing the Australian government to continue with this ? Do people still imagine that our “ situation “ can be resolved via waiting for the next election?

Expand full comment

Yes, when will there be criminal charges and arrests? AFTER MORE PEOPLE LINE UP FOR THEIR BIOWEAPON JABS AND ARE MAIMED OR DIE?

Expand full comment

Thank you, Phillip - the information you have provided here is an important addition to the complicated equation that explains how the Covid mRNA genetic injectables project was deployed on an unsuspecting public.

I would urge all those who want to understand how the travesty of the Covid mRNA genetic injectables came to take place to read the article by Jeffrey Tucker of the ‘Brownstone Institute’, dated the 07 January 2024. The title of the article is: “Reflections on the Bret Weinstein Interview”, and the link is:

https://brownstone.org/articles/reflections-on-the-bret-weinstein-interview/

The article is prefaced by the following description:

“Tucker Carlson has conducted a brilliant interview with biologist and podcaster Bret Weinstein, who has been on the Covid case for a very long time. Weinstein speaks with erudition, expertise, and great precision about a number of features of the Covid response. Mercifully, Carlson lets him speak. I urge you to take an hour and watch the entire episode.”

There is a link to the full 59-minute (05 January 2024) interview with Bret Weinstein embedded in the article, or alternatively, the interview can be accessed directly from Tucker Carlson’s website via the following link:

https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-bret-weinstein/

The interview had more than 3 million views within 24 hours of being posted, and I consider it one of the most important interviews on the Covid subject that I have seen, because Weinstein pulls together so many of the missing information strands that have been denied to us by the contemptible people who run the corporate media and the unconscionable self-serving liars of the health bureaucracies who set out to deceive us about what they were actually doing – and in so doing, have created the worst disaster in the degradation of the health of humanity in history.

By the end of the interview, you will have a reasonable layperson’s understanding of how the mRNA genetic injectables work within the body, and how and why they were deployed on the unsuspecting public, and by whom. The interview ends with a rather somber tone in discussing our future if the ordinary men & women in the street don’t quickly educate themselves about what has taken place - and then get off their backsides to take political action to force the people who run our elected governments to accept responsibility for the evil that they have done.

I agree with Jeffrey Tucker – the interview with Weinstein is absolute gold and will bring a much clearer understanding to what has been done to us all over the last three years. (The Brownstone Institute article provides a full transcript of the Weinstein interview – and incidentally, for those that may not be aware, the ‘Brownstone Institute’ is the gold-standard site for high quality articles on the Covid disaster.

Expand full comment

We will never know how long Australia has been involved in GOF research, but now they blantantly say it out loud. Why on earth are we involved in this, taxpayers are paying for?

As for vaccines, they are all poison, and none of them have ever been proven to work. Read ahealedplanet.net and here: https://tuxdoc.com/download/the-poisoned-needle-by-eleanor-mcbean-1957-vaccinationa-medical-delusion-by-rex-_pdf

Expand full comment

Brownstoning blackmailing

Narrative control of the corrupted

https://youtu.be/kDWRegK0Gwk?si=iAFgohCUcDuQJIvX

Expand full comment

Great, Phillip

And ALSO, despite only being provisionally approved for preventing disease, they were not approved AT ALL for the use of preventing transmission. So, it seems we were kept locked down, waiting for the rushed development of novel-technology genetic vaccines that were not even being designed to prevent transmission.

https://homocomfortus.substack.com/p/the-covid-response-in-australia

Expand full comment

The evil intent behind big pHARMa and the medical education/research and government healthcare has to be exposed before we see the gowns of justice sway in the peoples courts. Their most evil goal is the death and injury of babies and children. Hence pregnancy along with the elderly and disabled were the prime targets.

Qld health just dismissed a pregnant nurse for her dissent resistance to becoming jabbed with cv19 poison. This is despite mandates being lifted in September 2023.

Medicine has been utterly corrupted and there is many a deception taught as fact too hide malfeasant practices.

Here’s one I found (what will you discover?)

Mammalian physiology has nothing to do with oxygenation and this deception must fall away so everyone can see.

Oxygen is a manufactured product of air NOT a constituent of air.

What is the physical parameter that defines oxygen?

Medical oxygen has 67 parts per million of water contamination.

How is oxygen manufactured?

Air is dried of moisture and compressed repeatedly to reach the required dryness - parts per million of water contamination!

My Substack article is titled

We breathe air not oxygen.

Let’s now compare air and oxygen with the requirements of lung physiology.

Air is measured by its moisture, its humidity.

The lung alveoli requires the air reaching it to be at 100% humidity.

Can you see the mechanism for oxygen toxicity and oxygen poisoning?

Yes, oxygen toxicity is another word for dehydration.

Oxygen is air forced into an artificially dry state. Once released oxygen gas desires to return to its natural state: moist air. When released inside the lungs, moisture is extracted from the respiratory mucosa and delicate alveoli. This causes micro-clots.

The terms: Reactive oxygen species, oxidation and oxidised in physiology are describing dehydration.

Oxygen is not prescribed for breathlessness.

Instead it is primarily prescribed for the terminally ill.

Palliative care is not kind!

Oxygen obviously does not exist naturally in air. Plants and trees do not release oxygen.

Oxygen is changed into nitrogen with the addition of carbon particles to dampen flammability.

Oxygen and nitrogen are not constituents of air but products made from air.

My second article has a demonstration of this.

I say dehydration is the point of dis array that prevents a body from self healing.

Chronic dehydration has been instituted with the demonisation of salt from the 80s. Big pHARMa profits from medical propaganda: salt endangers the heart.

I have a new take on lung and blood physiology that dismisses the fraudulent gaseous exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide.

The red blood cells carry salt + water. They are vessels carrying and distributing salt water.

The red light monitoring is checking for hydration not oxygen saturation!

Dark RBCs are contracted and dehydrated.

Light RBCs are expanded and hydrated.

Monitoring the dark versus light RBCs calculates % of hydration.

The lungs rehydrate RBCs by adding salt + water to the alveoli capillary beds as they pass through, the RBCs are spongelike and soak up the salt + water, expanding and hydrating.

Just like the saline drip adds salt water to RBCs through venous exposure.

Dehydration is the vector of all dis-ease.

The salt restriction advice intentionally deployed in the 80s has caused the epidemic of chronic diseases.

Eg Dementia and alzheimers are the result of a chronically dehydrated brain. Plaque becomes visible when the tide goes out!

First sign of dehydration is a headache, the brain is very sensitive to low salt status. Acute hypo-natremia kills. Chronic hypo-natremia reduces brain functionality.

Why are women more prone to dementia? Women have significant additional salt requirements to maintain their reproductive mucosa etc

https://open.substack.com/pub/jane333/p/we-breath-air-not-oxygen?utm_ca

Expand full comment

They offer money to take it, hoping you die, but pay IF injured to hide their crime.

Expand full comment

Thanks. It is very rare that someone cites my work - much appreciated.

Expand full comment

Let's not forget the government's funeral assistance scheme for those who have died from the va$$ine.

Expand full comment

I read somewhere that they are deliberately diluting pharma regulations to push pharma products onto the market more quickly and less scrutiny.

As an aside, I came across this today : Australia Is Building World’s Largest Sudden Cardiac Arrest Registry to Solve the “Mystery” of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Sudden Cardiac Deaths

https://www.globalresearch.ca/australia-building-world-largest-sudden-cardiac-arrest-registry-solve-mystery-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-sudden-cardiac-deaths/5845476

We are dealing with criminals.

Expand full comment

Hang them all. I'm done playing nice. The breathtaking incompetence of the Useful Idiots - the middle men here in Australia - is also inexcusable for anyone in senior leadership positions here in Australia. I will not accept plausible deniability. Anyone with tertiary degrees, Masters & PhD's is not excused. I want the death penalty for them here in Australia. The Royal Commission will be a joke, just like the Royal Commission into Institutional Child Abuse that protected the Politicians and Judiciary - the actual predatory classes that NEED to be hung because they are either devoid of a moral compass or they are easily blackmailed and manipulated due to the dirty videos the deep state has on them, or they are so damn selfish, greedy and power hungry that they took the money and sold out on the Australian people. Nuremberg trials only ended in 1946 - less than 80 years ago - time to take back control of our Judiciary, reinstate the Death penalty for Treason, and rebuild the gallows. Meanwhile, we are relying on USA to hang their deep state criminals.

Expand full comment

I think we should distinguish between the full on bad actors, those who actually knew, or whose interests were conflicted, or had ideological agendas such as for 'vaccines' or for increasing control of the population ... from the less-bad ones who were put in positions as fall guys because they tended to over-work and be over-trusting and had a too-high sense of duty, who were at their limit of human energy and were just bowled along by the wave of propaganda and fear.

Expand full comment

I agree. I most certainly do not mean for the innocent that have been brainwashed to the vaccine narrative, to be sentenced to death. HOWEVER senior health bureaucrats have zero excuse, because they have no excuses for ignoring well established medical ethics and for not following the actual science. That includes ALL of the Chief Health Officers here in Australia. Inexcusable, disgraceful conduct. The majority of us have been pro-vaccine and had all our shots since we were kids, most of our lives. We all drank the Kool Aid. But these ones here need to die https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDWRegK0Gwk . This is exactly why I say that the Royal Commission will be a joke - we all know it - until they fix the Royal Commission into Institutional Child Abuse that protected the Politicians and Judiciary. That is the entire problem - those politicians and elite that had no moral compass and were blackmailed, have retained their positions and are still helping the deep state cabal.

Expand full comment

agree about blackmailed elected officials, and even more, those who were the blackmailers .

Yes there is always a risk that an attempt, like the royal commission, to make progress against the controlling class may not be successful. But I feel these sorts of efforts at the very least help to galvanise us and bring more people into the light. It seems a good approach is to keep trying many avenues in parallel ... including political. In fact, together we are all making great progress. Remember, it used to be only the not-injected on our side? It's like watching the full moon rise out of the sea. In a brief glimpse it seems to be still, but over a few minutes we can remember that it grew from a dot of light, to a pink-shaded shy new born, to a fully-formed bright shining emblem of ancient truth. Every step we take makes some progress. I am so proud of the progress we have all made so far.

Expand full comment

Wow, what a beautiful analogy! Thankyou, you brought tears to my eyes when you stated "It's like watching the full moon rise out of the sea. In a brief glimpse it seems to be still, but over a few minutes we can remember that it grew from a dot of light, to a pink-shaded shy new born, to a fully-formed bright shining emblem of ancient truth. Every step we take makes some progress. I am so proud of the progress we have all made so far."

You are absolutely right, I agree. Thankyou for the perspective that the Royal Commission can certainly help to awaken many more people - and that is a really good reason to have one. Let's see what the MSM do with that however, how much attention they pay to the Royal Commission in news reports - I expect the biased deep state controlled MSM will minimize attention and distract with old news - like Epstein's flight logs - if we let them get away with it. The key will be that we do not stop at a Royal Commission, and escalate focus and action towards insisting on criminal prosecutions. As Vera Sharav, one of the last remaining Holocaust survivors said at the recent 75th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials - "Never again is Now". https://rumble.com/v1gtl0n-vera-sharav-speech-at-nuremberg-75.html

Expand full comment

no excuses apply

Expand full comment

On which side do you include some dopey pharmacist (for example) who didn’t do any due diligence and simply gave out as many jabs as he/she could handle to collect the $29 per head ...

Expand full comment

Well I suppose if we use a spectrum from ... A) psychopathic driver of control, despite the risks (bottom 2 percentile) B) dopey pharmacist (bottom 30 percentile), C) dopey vaccinee dutifully lining up for the next injection (bottom 70%), D) dissident refusing and working to influence those around them (top 30%), essential, but no medals, and E) Full-on public prominent fearless leader dissident, medals all over chest (Top 2%) ... then I suppose a B?

I just think some bad actors were worse than others. (by the way, I would be a D).

Expand full comment

And Phillip would be an E

Expand full comment