Phillip, as you know, I've been seeking transparency and accountability for Covid-19 vaccination policy for the past more than four years, and for general vaccination policy for many years before this.
It has been a very long and difficult road to hoe...
I have copied Catherine Bennett on some of my correspondence, as she has been a very vocal commentator on the Covid-19 response, including promoting Covid-19 vaccination.
These people with titles in universities have a privileged position to influence policy affecting millions of people, including children. They must be accountable.
On this email I noted it was copied to: People influential on taxpayer-funded health/vaccination policy in Australia, via the scientific and medical establishment.
As usual, I didn't receive a response from Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly, because such unelected officers apparently have no respect for the concerns of the general public re taxpayer-funded Covid-19 vaccination policy.
I did receive a response from Catherine Bennett however, in which she said:
QUOTE:
STOP writing to me.
REMOVE me from this email cc list.
I will NOT ask again
Hopefully that is clear enough for you
END OF QUOTE
And we're relying on such people as Catherine Bennett to oversee a Covid-19 inquiry, people who have such contempt for the public?
This is the dilemma facing members of the public seeking accountability from those people influencing taxpayer-funded vaccination policy - where are we to turn? There is little or no accountability in this rotten system operating in Australia.
What a perfect idiom for modern Australia ... a diverse panel of “strong independent women” none of whom are remotely impartial nor qualified to undertake the role, but all of whom are suitably well-connected, credulous, without imagination and arrogant enough to do a mediocre job “managing” a predictable and non-controversial outcome generally favourable of the government’s role while pointing to a few choreographed “failings” that will best be dealt with by “increasing funding for pharma research and improving government’s communication to the public through official, trusted channels earlier”. Just ask the absolute nobodies who performed a similar role reviewing WA’s covid response a year ago, “we investigated ourselves and found that our response was absolutely world-class”.
Can't wait for those "focus groups". They usually put a "leader" into each round table discussion group; he/she lets everyone have their say and then "sums up the discussion", being careful to leave out all dissenters and inconvenient responses. I know the strategy well. Claytons focus groups.
Looks like Professor Catherine Bennett ate her way through the pandemic!!. Very very sympathetic to those who overindulge is stressful times but not her… she brought unbelievable stress to us all
At last.....the "experts" are on the job to tell us where we went wrong. ? What utter hubris!! We didn't go wrong - we were forced down the wrong path without any consideration of personal rights and sovereignty. So now we have only one panel member with relevant epidemiological experience and she is a proponent of masking, lock downs and vaccinating children! No diversity of opinions here. Nothing to see - the foregone conclusions will be presented in report form soon. A bloody whitewash of an enquiry that will absolve all those "scientist experts and advisors" and politicians who plagued our tv sets each day with fear and lies. A waste of public money.
OMG! Bennett was just a joke in her prognostications re the pandemic. Always appeared to be just a government/bureaucracy mouthpiece. Kruk has form as professional bureaucrat.
They continue to abuse the populations, following the abuse they are now in the stage of trying to move past it with reconciliation and trying to calm people, we now have useless official enquiries which will change nothing before another cycle begins. In an abusive relationship you never know when and what will trigger the abuse.
Why am I not surprised. I didn’t for a second thunk that this ‘enquiry’ would be anything other than a cover-up. These ‘experts’ by now must know of the damage and death caused by the shots. How do they live with themselves.
I received their email too, and I was a little concerned I must admit... but your commentary has calmed me down: I now realise that everything will be alright!
Phillip, as you know, I've been seeking transparency and accountability for Covid-19 vaccination policy for the past more than four years, and for general vaccination policy for many years before this.
It has been a very long and difficult road to hoe...
I have copied Catherine Bennett on some of my correspondence, as she has been a very vocal commentator on the Covid-19 response, including promoting Covid-19 vaccination.
These people with titles in universities have a privileged position to influence policy affecting millions of people, including children. They must be accountable.
For example, on 19 October 2022, I included Catherine Bennett and other people influential on Covid-19 policy on an email I sent to Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly, titled: Mandated Covid jabs - What is the scientific and medical justification for these mandated medical interventions? The email is accessible via this link: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2023/04/mandated-covid-jabs-what-is-the-scientific-and-medical-justification-for-these-mandated-medical-interventions.pdf
On this email I noted it was copied to: People influential on taxpayer-funded health/vaccination policy in Australia, via the scientific and medical establishment.
As usual, I didn't receive a response from Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly, because such unelected officers apparently have no respect for the concerns of the general public re taxpayer-funded Covid-19 vaccination policy.
I did receive a response from Catherine Bennett however, in which she said:
QUOTE:
STOP writing to me.
REMOVE me from this email cc list.
I will NOT ask again
Hopefully that is clear enough for you
END OF QUOTE
And we're relying on such people as Catherine Bennett to oversee a Covid-19 inquiry, people who have such contempt for the public?
This is the dilemma facing members of the public seeking accountability from those people influencing taxpayer-funded vaccination policy - where are we to turn? There is little or no accountability in this rotten system operating in Australia.
I made a submission to the Covid-19 Response Inquiry, see: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2024/03/submission-to-the-australian-commonwealth-government-covid-19-inquiry-e-hart.pdf
And a similar submission re Terms of Reference for a Covid-19 Royal Commission, see: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/submission-re-terms-of-reference-for-covid-19-royal-commission-elizabeth-hart.pdf
Does anyone pay attention to these submissions? Particularly when the foxes remain in charge of the chicken coop?
It's a farce...a diabolical farce...
Catherine Bennett sells vaccines for the government and is an architect of covid democide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dgtq3QvZUI
Wow, looks like a crack team that will put all our doubts to rest! The struggle continues ...
And exactly what expertise does Ms Robyn Kruk bring to the table ? And the other two for that matter .
So many experts to choose from and these are the best?
What a perfect idiom for modern Australia ... a diverse panel of “strong independent women” none of whom are remotely impartial nor qualified to undertake the role, but all of whom are suitably well-connected, credulous, without imagination and arrogant enough to do a mediocre job “managing” a predictable and non-controversial outcome generally favourable of the government’s role while pointing to a few choreographed “failings” that will best be dealt with by “increasing funding for pharma research and improving government’s communication to the public through official, trusted channels earlier”. Just ask the absolute nobodies who performed a similar role reviewing WA’s covid response a year ago, “we investigated ourselves and found that our response was absolutely world-class”.
Can't wait for those "focus groups". They usually put a "leader" into each round table discussion group; he/she lets everyone have their say and then "sums up the discussion", being careful to leave out all dissenters and inconvenient responses. I know the strategy well. Claytons focus groups.
what a joke
More money wasted on dumb and dumber.
Phew!!!!
Looks like Professor Catherine Bennett ate her way through the pandemic!!. Very very sympathetic to those who overindulge is stressful times but not her… she brought unbelievable stress to us all
At last.....the "experts" are on the job to tell us where we went wrong. ? What utter hubris!! We didn't go wrong - we were forced down the wrong path without any consideration of personal rights and sovereignty. So now we have only one panel member with relevant epidemiological experience and she is a proponent of masking, lock downs and vaccinating children! No diversity of opinions here. Nothing to see - the foregone conclusions will be presented in report form soon. A bloody whitewash of an enquiry that will absolve all those "scientist experts and advisors" and politicians who plagued our tv sets each day with fear and lies. A waste of public money.
The ones who are still convinced the virus came from a bat? Or have they progressed to pangolin?
OMG! Bennett was just a joke in her prognostications re the pandemic. Always appeared to be just a government/bureaucracy mouthpiece. Kruk has form as professional bureaucrat.
They continue to abuse the populations, following the abuse they are now in the stage of trying to move past it with reconciliation and trying to calm people, we now have useless official enquiries which will change nothing before another cycle begins. In an abusive relationship you never know when and what will trigger the abuse.
Why am I not surprised. I didn’t for a second thunk that this ‘enquiry’ would be anything other than a cover-up. These ‘experts’ by now must know of the damage and death caused by the shots. How do they live with themselves.
I received their email too, and I was a little concerned I must admit... but your commentary has calmed me down: I now realise that everything will be alright!
I see this crack team fulfils the definition of 'Exspurt' - a drip under pressure!