75 Comments

Phillip, as you know, I've been seeking transparency and accountability for Covid-19 vaccination policy for the past more than four years, and for general vaccination policy for many years before this.

It has been a very long and difficult road to hoe...

I have copied Catherine Bennett on some of my correspondence, as she has been a very vocal commentator on the Covid-19 response, including promoting Covid-19 vaccination.

These people with titles in universities have a privileged position to influence policy affecting millions of people, including children. They must be accountable.

For example, on 19 October 2022, I included Catherine Bennett and other people influential on Covid-19 policy on an email I sent to Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly, titled: Mandated Covid jabs - What is the scientific and medical justification for these mandated medical interventions? The email is accessible via this link: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2023/04/mandated-covid-jabs-what-is-the-scientific-and-medical-justification-for-these-mandated-medical-interventions.pdf

On this email I noted it was copied to: People influential on taxpayer-funded health/vaccination policy in Australia, via the scientific and medical establishment.

As usual, I didn't receive a response from Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly, because such unelected officers apparently have no respect for the concerns of the general public re taxpayer-funded Covid-19 vaccination policy.

I did receive a response from Catherine Bennett however, in which she said:

QUOTE:

STOP writing to me.

REMOVE me from this email cc list.

I will NOT ask again

Hopefully that is clear enough for you

END OF QUOTE

And we're relying on such people as Catherine Bennett to oversee a Covid-19 inquiry, people who have such contempt for the public?

This is the dilemma facing members of the public seeking accountability from those people influencing taxpayer-funded vaccination policy - where are we to turn? There is little or no accountability in this rotten system operating in Australia.

I made a submission to the Covid-19 Response Inquiry, see: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2024/03/submission-to-the-australian-commonwealth-government-covid-19-inquiry-e-hart.pdf

And a similar submission re Terms of Reference for a Covid-19 Royal Commission, see: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/submission-re-terms-of-reference-for-covid-19-royal-commission-elizabeth-hart.pdf

Does anyone pay attention to these submissions? Particularly when the foxes remain in charge of the chicken coop?

It's a farce...a diabolical farce...

Expand full comment

LOL

Bennett's response is hilarious, wow. Can't even find the block button if it bothers her that much.

I am sure we can expect a breathless op-ed about how she has been targeted by 'email trolls' as a 'strong academic woman.'

Edit: OH MY GOD

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/epidemiologist-professor-catherine-bennett-reveals-shocking-abuse-from-covid-trolls/news-story/45c65e7b42ea239f3206f17a1e8fde11

Expand full comment

We need an urgent investigation into these people knocking around universities who have been exerting extraordinary power and influence over our lives...

Who ARE these people?!?!?!

Catherine Bennett for instance, here's her bio: https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/people/catherine-bennett

She's an epidemiologist... What value have epidemiologists added to the world? There's a question...

Have a look at Bennett's bio - what does she know about 'Covid', and the Covid vaccine products? I suggest little or nothing.

And yet there she was making calls for mass population vaccination, see for example: 'COVID-19 boosters are ‘definitely worth it', says leading epidemiologist', on one of the vaccine industry's reliable propaganda sites, SBS: https://www.sbs.com.au/language/english/en/podcast-episode/covid-19-boosters-are-definitely-worth-it-says-leading-epidemiologist/2yjujs8iz

Is Catherine Bennett qualified to "ensure people have all their recommended boosters..."?

Does Bennett have a clue about 'voluntary informed consent'?

Does ANYONE in the medical and scientific establishment have a clue about 'voluntary informed consent'?! Or in the legal system?

It doesn't seem like it, because here we are with reportedly 70.5 million Covid injections administered in Australia*, and I suggest in NOT ONE CASE has valid voluntary informed consent been obtained...because everyone has been misled, coerced, intimidated and even MANDATED to submit to these medical interventions, and NO-ONE has been properly informed.

Do you think Catherine Bennett and her mates will be addressing this devastating situation in their Covid-19 Inquiry? I suggest it's shaping up to be another whitewash, just like the rubbish Hallett Covid-19 Inquiry in the UK.

* https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-03/covid-19-vaccine-rollout-update-8-march-2024.pdf

Expand full comment

No, I don’t think many of the medical professionals do know about informed consent!!!! Or how it would work in the legal system, especially since AHPRA has stated that they must get informed consent!!!

That’s the ACHILLES HEEL!!!!! People who were not given informed consent can sue the person who gave it to them, and the injectors’ medical insurer will have to pay out!!! Don’t wait for class actions, just do it!! Where are the lawyers? Are they all paid off also!!!? Be your own lawyer-act on your own or loved one’s behalf!!!

Expand full comment

I think we should all complain about the stereotypical picture of a “granny” for someone over 65 yrs old. 65 years (is) young!

Expand full comment

Also see this article on The Conversation, featuring for instance Raina MacIntyre...

5 Australian COVID experts on receiving abuse and trolling amid the pandemic: https://theconversation.com/5-australian-covid-experts-on-receiving-abuse-and-trolling-amid-the-pandemic-169825

Expand full comment

Re Raina MacIntyre, also see DemocracyManifest's substack article: Plotting the "Pandemic". The "Origins of Covid" and other Pandemic Theatre: https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/plotting-the-pandemic

Expand full comment

Sorry Elizabeth, reply to mary butler from me was meant to go to you.

And that Paul Kelly, he’s just some yes man from hell. I wish he’d go back there.

Expand full comment

I like this one! At least the fella admits he was conned.

Most? members of Australian public still don’t know they’ve been conned.

Expand full comment

She shares her experience in “the great lie” and doesn’t know she’s been lied to! Stupid woman.

Expand full comment

She talks about cake in this article! And how she would feel really small, in a roomful of mainly men.

Well I bet she hasn’t felt really small for a long time!

Expand full comment

Well said Elizabeth… you have been clear and unrelenting

Expand full comment

I think all Australians need to know that Bennett woman’s response to you Elizabeth-What a rude and stupid thing for a “professor” to say. Professor of computer modelling I guess. A job that a 5 year old can do. Computer models are usually way off the track. Waaaay off.

And we all know there was no pandemic, except the pandemic of the stupid, and the poor things who thought they have to take the killer shot.

Bennett and other so called epidemiologists are guilty of crimes against the people, and I think the people should decide the punishment! 😡🥳 😱😁

Expand full comment

Thanks for confirming with I already knew with your personal testimony of Catherine’s emails. This is not an inquiry, it’s a cover-up.

Expand full comment

It's a farce alright Elizabeth & that dills response to you might just come back & sort her right out in the future.That particular person & the people of her ilk live in a parallel universe & unfortunately for us ( just sit & watch the great unwashed in a shopping centre for half an hour) who actually can think this & many other events through, are stuck in the "pen" with the eyes closed, fingers in their ears, Tay,Tay loving, AFL, NRL cheering, navel gazing, lint pickers who wouldn't have a clue that they had a bus up them until the people started getting out. Ahhh, I feel soooo much better. Keep going you ARE appreciated.👍🇦🇺😃

Expand full comment

I had to think who’s Tay, Tay? Then it came to me. That woman is a fair dinkum witch, associated with the women’s part of the masons. I am deadly serious. They are satanists, and I don’t want to say what they do.

Expand full comment

Elizabeth, that is a really great email you sent to Paul Kelly, and cc’d Bennett, and so many more! And you thought about the medical insurance that the “medical professionals” have- and asked insurers what happens when informed consent is not given, when AHPRA has clearly stated they NEED to get voluntary informed consent.

I think people who have been mandated to get the “vax” should be going after medical practitioners’ insurance companies. Especially if they are injured, or worse, and soon!!!! That includes pharmacists and nurses, even aides, as well as doctors of course.

Kudos to you Elizabeth! I’d say that’s the main reason that Bennett woman didn’t want your emails. She was probably trying to think what to do about her medical insurer after she’d been on tv, radio and internet, almost non stop, publicly telling people to get safe & effective “vaccines”. She knew they were not safe and effective. She’d probably be bankrolled by gov’t, and people like Bill Gates, George Soros and sons, the usual suspects.

That’s the catch people-medicos not obtaining informed consent goes against what AHPRA says, so failure to get this consent is a crime!!!!! AND ALL MEDICOS HAVE INSURANCE!!

GO AFTER THEM!!!!!!!

Expand full comment

Elizabeth, thank you so much for being a real voice for real people with your submissions. They are fantastic.

And I can’t believe you got a response from AHPRA! Not that they said much, but what they said is critical, about informed consent! Well done!!

Expand full comment

Catherine Bennett sells vaccines for the government and is an architect of covid democide.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dgtq3QvZUI

Expand full comment

The booster offers a "different type" of protection...sort of like this Inquiry, which will offer us a "different type" of inquiry? Impartiality at its finest, eh?

Expand full comment

More like a different type of reality ... I.e. one of their own making. You look back at Soviet era show trials, and you couldn’t make up a more suitable modern day facsimile of these pathetic pantomime “reviews”.

Expand full comment

Yes, complete with Pravda 'comedians' parroting government propaganda and audiences clapping like trained seals.

Weird to live through it.

Expand full comment

I love some of the comments in relation to this video. There’s one saying something like, why should I take health advice from an overweight woman who can’t even keep herself healthy!

That is a very much watched bit of video. I have to mention “different type of protection” as well. How ludicrous!!! What a liar!

Expand full comment

Wow, looks like a crack team that will put all our doubts to rest! The struggle continues ...

Expand full comment

And exactly what expertise does Ms Robyn Kruk bring to the table ? And the other two for that matter .

So many experts to choose from and these are the best?

Expand full comment

These idiots are perfect in the eyes of the covid benefactors.

Expand full comment

Sad isn’t it!

Expand full comment

What a perfect idiom for modern Australia ... a diverse panel of “strong independent women” none of whom are remotely impartial nor qualified to undertake the role, but all of whom are suitably well-connected, credulous, without imagination and arrogant enough to do a mediocre job “managing” a predictable and non-controversial outcome generally favourable of the government’s role while pointing to a few choreographed “failings” that will best be dealt with by “increasing funding for pharma research and improving government’s communication to the public through official, trusted channels earlier”. Just ask the absolute nobodies who performed a similar role reviewing WA’s covid response a year ago, “we investigated ourselves and found that our response was absolutely world-class”.

Expand full comment

Can't wait for those "focus groups". They usually put a "leader" into each round table discussion group; he/she lets everyone have their say and then "sums up the discussion", being careful to leave out all dissenters and inconvenient responses. I know the strategy well. Claytons focus groups.

Expand full comment

what a joke

Expand full comment

Exactly my thoughts.

Expand full comment

More money wasted on dumb and dumber.

Expand full comment

Phew!!!!

Looks like Professor Catherine Bennett ate her way through the pandemic!!. Very very sympathetic to those who overindulge is stressful times but not her… she brought unbelievable stress to us all

Expand full comment

Look on the bright side, Mary, no chance of the good professor ever urging “let them eat cake” because she’s already eaten it.

Expand full comment

Need humour in these crazy times … it is everywhere! … and she a case of ‘can have her cakes and eat it too’ or whatever that saying is

Expand full comment

Let’s see which way the cookie crumbles.

Expand full comment

At last.....the "experts" are on the job to tell us where we went wrong. ? What utter hubris!! We didn't go wrong - we were forced down the wrong path without any consideration of personal rights and sovereignty. So now we have only one panel member with relevant epidemiological experience and she is a proponent of masking, lock downs and vaccinating children! No diversity of opinions here. Nothing to see - the foregone conclusions will be presented in report form soon. A bloody whitewash of an enquiry that will absolve all those "scientist experts and advisors" and politicians who plagued our tv sets each day with fear and lies. A waste of public money.

Expand full comment

It was easier not watching tv!

Expand full comment

The ones who are still convinced the virus came from a bat? Or have they progressed to pangolin?

Expand full comment

OMG! Bennett was just a joke in her prognostications re the pandemic. Always appeared to be just a government/bureaucracy mouthpiece. Kruk has form as professional bureaucrat.

Expand full comment

They continue to abuse the populations, following the abuse they are now in the stage of trying to move past it with reconciliation and trying to calm people, we now have useless official enquiries which will change nothing before another cycle begins. In an abusive relationship you never know when and what will trigger the abuse.

Expand full comment

Why am I not surprised. I didn’t for a second thunk that this ‘enquiry’ would be anything other than a cover-up. These ‘experts’ by now must know of the damage and death caused by the shots. How do they live with themselves.

Expand full comment

By eating the finest chocolate, drinking the finest wines and attending more meetings to make themselves feel privelaged and important.

Expand full comment

Haha. Deserves a million likes!

Expand full comment

Thanks, just what popped into my head, lol. Big Harma puppets.

Expand full comment

I received their email too, and I was a little concerned I must admit... but your commentary has calmed me down: I now realise that everything will be alright!

Expand full comment

I see this crack team fulfils the definition of 'Exspurt' - a drip under pressure!

Expand full comment