13 Comments

I am amending my donor status to absolutely not - until this madness ends. Everyone needs to cancel their consent to donation, then they might take notice.

Expand full comment

Absolutely heartbreaking and infuriating watching the so called dr telling her to get jabbed the vaccines are safe. All transplants are mandated. There are several people needing kidney transplants but they say no. Even Black Dog institute (still today) won’t treat a suicidal person with severe anxiety and depression with ketamine unless she’s vaccinated. I cancelled my donor consent and have stopped giving blood. It’s criminal and society don’t see anything wrong with it.

Expand full comment

Absolute disgusting this surgeon should be sued should be taking off his medical degree can’t believe that a doctor/surgeon is allowed to refuse a transplant on a patient who has not been vaccinated it is proven that the Pfizer covid vaccine can cause hart problems why would a patient with hart conditions would have the vaccine in the first place 😡shame on this surgeon karma will get him 👍

Expand full comment

"A hospital in Melbourne and heart transplant surgeons are preventing a woman from getting a new heart because she is not vaccinated!"

On what basis are the hospital and heart transplant surgeons demanding the woman be Covid jabbed?

They must be aware that a health practitioner must obtain 'voluntary informed consent' before the Covid jabs? For example as stipulated in The Australian Immunisation Handbook, see under valid consent: https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/contents/vaccination-procedures/preparing-for-vaccination#valid-consent

If a health practitioner inserts the needle without voluntary informed consent, this could have repercussions for the health practitioner.

Again, on what basis are the hospital and heart transplant surgeons bullying this woman to involuntarily submit to the Covid jabs?

Expand full comment

As you say - there is simply no excuse - all the data is there. One can only assume - they are scum!

Expand full comment

Dan Andrews, many will hang

Expand full comment

They want to eliminate the Control Group - while there are still people who haven't partaken, they are potential evidence for research into the long-term harms caused by these transfection-jabs.

Expand full comment

I pray she is able to stand her ground in this horrendous situation. This should not be happening in this day and age. People have lost their rights. How dare Drs and politicians play God over this women. Makes my blood boil.

Expand full comment

Comply at all costs we are in a lot of trouble but many are using compliance to have a short term win and this is there preference...it’s easier to attempt to gain the system through compliance than to fight against the system and be left marginalised take your pick...one is being rewarded and it’s not the option that we need during these times!

Expand full comment

You may have heard of the case in NZ where a mother wanted her baby to have ' unvaxxed blood" during surgery and the doctors took her to court to gain legal control over her child and use blood from the blood bank. The mother was not opposed to the surgery her child needed but was concerned as to the source of the blood supply for a transfusion. You may not be aware that there was a previous case in the US. Same situation , in this case the Mother recorded everything. For baby had an operation and was given a transfusion from the blood bank. The blood was introduced into the baby's body near the knee . A blood clot quickly developed and over the next three days the hospital gave the baby anti clotting medication. On the fourth day he died. An autopsy showed that he had a clot that extended from his knee to his heart. Had the mother not recorded everything on her phone there would be no record ,because the hospital has deleted all records of the child being there.

I believe the issue is the blood supply. The patient to them is nothing but cannon fodder The medical profession does not want it known that the blood supply is contaminated. If the patient takes the Covid shot and has repercussions then the injection can be blamed . If she doesn't have the shot and is damaged then the blood supply will be exposed.

Expand full comment

OTOH, statistically speaking, the heart she would most likely receive would come from a vaccinated person, given the high rates of COVID vaccination in Australia. In other words, she'd likely be replacing one defective heart with another. Not good, whichever way you slice it.

And could we please stop calling these shots "therapy" (i.e., "gene-based therapy"). There is absolutely nothing therapeutic about them. Quite the opposite, in fact. They appear to be highly pathogenic in some individuals.

That's another sneaky way that the TGA et al. surreptitiously suggests that these shots are only good: they're approved as "gene-based therapy." Let's resist that little sleight-of-hand as well.

Expand full comment

How is anyone still pushing this evil. There has to be accountability and justice soon to end this madness.

Expand full comment