Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karyne's avatar

It’s unbelievable to me that a ‘professor’ could be so blind and ignorant. These sorts of people take the easy way out. Without question they simply take what another has told them as being the truth. He should know better. I wonder what part of the word ‘experimental’ he didn’t understand. It’s a sad reflection on our education system when a supposedly highly educated person could be so lacking in common sense and knowledge. Worse, they influence others who believe them. I wonder how many people he inadvertently injured.

Expand full comment
Dr Rosemary Faire's avatar

Not enough of the resistance are using the word "transfection" injections for these shots and explaining exactly why, even without the contamination, the spike, the long-lived RNA, the SV40 promoter, etc, etc, transfection itself is a BAD IDEA for healthy humans - it hasn't even passed the test for safety for people with terminal cancer! How this idea ever got past the brainstorming-idiotic-ideas phase beats me! I really suspect it is the "biosecurity emergency" crowd who have convinced ignorant military and politicians that we need this "ready-to-mobilise" platform to be well-oiled, churning out jabs to domesticated humans and animals, "just in case" there's a BioW attack or real pandemic (totally without biological plausibility). Most narrowly-educated doctors are just the useful idiot-pushers in the global biosecurity machine who are earning too much to care about truth.

Expand full comment
51 more comments...

No posts