SECRETS - MANY SECRETS

You just don't need to know the truth.....move on

Why have there been so many secrets?

The best kept secret so far has been the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It has taken 3 and a half years for the truth to come out. We have all been subjected to the ravages of a genetically engineered laboratory made virus and nobody responsible has for this disaster have been brought to justice, no reparations have even been mentioned.

Even the US FDA wanted to keep secret the COVID injection safety data submitted to them for regulatory evaluation for 75 years. This is outrageous.

Pfizer and the other COVID “vaccine” manufactures have set up secret contracts with governments to protect themselves from litigation due to serious adverse events and death caused by the injections.  South Africa set up such a secret agreement but this Agreement (dated 30 March 2021) has now been revealed.  It would be a fair guess that Australia has a similar Agreement.

Here are a few excerpts from the hereto secret South African Pfizer Agreement (the whole Pfizer Agreement is below and it has shocked the world):

Pfizer Agreement Sa Ocrpfizer 1 Redacted With Bookmarks

13.6MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Pfizer knew they could not claim the COVID “vaccine” was “safe and effective” as our health bureaucrats and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) have fraudulently claimed.

The Pfizer Agreement (Page 21) makes this clear:

Pfizer said: “Purchaser [the government] further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.”

The Pfizer Agreement (Page 23) provided an incredible level of indemnity and stated:

"Indemnification by Purchaser. Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, third parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or any of their respective Affiliates may directly or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the research, development, manufacture, distribution, commercialization or use of the Vaccine, and each of the officers, directors, employees and other agents and representatives, and the respective predecessors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing ("Indemnitees"), from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' and other counsels' fees and other expenses of an investigation or litigation), whether sounding in contract, tort (delict), intellectual property, or any other theory, and whether legal, statutory, equitable or otherwise by any natural or legal person (collectively, "Losses") caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine, including but not limited to any stage of design , development, investigation, formulation , testing, clinical testing, manufacture, labelling, packaging, transport, storage, distribution, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, · licensing, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, provision, or use of the Vaccine, any information, instructions, advice or guidance provided by Pfizer, or BioNTech or any of their respective Affiliates and relating to the use of the Vaccine, or any processing or transfer of anyone's personal information processed and transferred by Purchaser to the Indemnitees ("Covered Activities").

The Agreement (page 24) even covered Pfizer for legal fees if it were to be sued.

"Pfizer shall have the right to assume control of such defense (directly or through either one of its Affiliates or BioNTech), and Purchaser shall pay (as incurred and on demand), all Losses, including, without limitation, the reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred by Indemnitee(s), in connection with the Indemnified Claim."

The Pfizer Agreement (page 25) even provided protection against negligence:

“Subject to the exclusions set forth in Section 9.3, in no circumstances shall (i) either Party be liable to the other Party or its Affiliates, whether arising in tort (including, without limitation, negligence), contract or otherwise, for any indirect, special, consequential, incidental or punitive damages, whether in contract, warranty, tort, negligence, strict liability or otherwise arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the transactions contemplated therein or any breach thereof (whether or not reasonably foreseeable and even if the first Party had been advised of the possibility of the other Party incurring such loss or type of loss), and (ii) in the case of Pfizer and its Affiliates, in no event shall Pfizer be liable to Purchaser for any direct damages except to the extent such direct damages were a result of a material breach of a representation or warranty by Pfizer under this Agreement that directly and solely caused the damage. In no instance shall Pfizer and its Affiliates be liable to Purchaser (whether arising in warranty, tort (including, without limitation, negligence), contract, strict liability or otherwise) for any liabilities of Purchaser to any third party, including, without limitation, through contribution, indemnity, or for any claim for which Purchaser would have to indemnify Pfizer if that claim were brought directly against Pfizer.”

HOW ACCURATE WERE THE PCR TESTS FOR COVID?

Closer to home, Senator Gerard Rennick has asked our Therapeutic Goods Administration an important question about the specificity of the PCR test used to define if a person was COVID positive. If a test (like the PCR test) has low specificity (ie shows a positive test result to coronaviruses other than SARS-CoV-2 which may be responsible for the common cold), then the test result cannot be relied upon. It is the unique relatively short primer nucleotide sequence used in these tests which should be unique to the virus being detected which is important in determining specificity. Our TGA should be able to tell us how reliable the PCR tests were to determine the number of “COVID CASES”. Because it was the number of COVID CASES that drove government lockdowns, travel restrictions, masking and mandatory vaccinations.

Just how accurate were the PCR tests? That is a secret.

They have never told us. Not only that, the PCR tests were used at a Cycle Threshold up to 45 times which meant they were cranked up to be so sensitive that the result was near meaningless. The actual number of COVID CASES may well have been much lower than we were all told. It was a scam from the beginning.

Listen to Senator Gerard Rennick try to find out about the specificity of the PCR tests. Gerard has an excellent understanding of these technical issues. CLICK HERE to view a 2 min video from the Senate.

MY SUBSTACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE ENTIRELY FREE.  I ENDEAVOUR TO BRING YOU THE TRUTH.  PLEASE SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THAT IS ALL I ASK.

Marcia Langton says the “NO” campaign is racist! This is useful insight into the minds of the activists pushing this Referendum.