SHOULD ALL VACCINES BE ASSUMED TO BE UNSAFE UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE?
The onus of proof of safety must rest with the manufactures - not with parents
There is absolutely no doubt that vaccines, as a therapeutic group, are subjected to the absolute lowest level of safety testing as compared to ALL OTHER DRUGS. The vaccines, as a therapeutic group, are reported to have a high reported incidence of adverse effects and are given to new-born infants, babies, children and pregnant mothers based on extremely limited safety data and, in many cases, are mandated. Vaccines, it could be argued, should be subjected to the HIGHEST SAFETY STANDARDS of any drugs.
In addition, for ALL OTHER DRUGS, the burden of proof of quality, safety and efficacy rests with the manufacturer and these drugs are considered UNSAFE until there is reasonable evidence to consider them relatively SAFE. See my Substack of 11 Jan. 2023 (CLICK HERE - one of my first Substacks). This has ALWAYS been the way drug regulation works worldwide. But in the case of vaccines, this burden of proof has shifted from the manufacturer to the consumer and the consumer is not in a position to contest the safety and efficacy claim in courts of law unless they have a spare few million dollars for legal costs and a decade or so time on their hands.
We can see in real time how difficult it is to get the drug regulators to admit vaccines do harm and to admit that vaccines should not be declared “safe” in any unqualified way. The onus of proof rests with the consumer.
Vaccine manufacturers seek the perfect business model: protected from all liability, mandated use of their product by governments and reduced development costs because extensive safety testing is not required.
Watch the ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) video Episode 347 “Vaccine Experts Under Oath” (1 hr) for some astounding revelations about the safety of all vaccines. MUST WATCH. MUST WATCH. CLICK HERE to view. You will see and listen to the most highly regarded vaccine expert alive admit under oath that modern day vaccines have not been subjected to safety testing to detect the possible link with autism and other neurological conditions. ASTOUNDING!
Vaccines were exonerated from all legal liability in the US from 1986. COVID “vaccine” manufacturers similarly appear to be exonerated from liability due to death or serious injury.
The safety of many vaccines is unknown because the clinical trial testing usually does not include a placebo group. It is impossible to determine any level of safety without a placebo group and longer term safety observations.
The link between autism and vaccines is still a very real possibility. Why is this not being investigated being that autism has risen from being an extremely rare disorder decades ago to one in 34 children today when the vaccine schedule necessitates 72 individual vaccines. The vaccine industry refuses to study the possible relationship between childhood vaccines and autism. It would not be hard to do the study retrospectively from medical records.
Now you know the truth.
IT IS REPORTED - UNVACCINATED PARENTS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA WHO HAVE SICK KIDS IN HOSPITAL WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO VISIT
This cannot be happening……
Anthony Albanese Announces Australia Visit for Early 2024
November 17, 2023
MY SUBSTACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE ENTIRELY FREE. I ENDEAVOUR TO BRING YOU THE TRUTH. PLEASE SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THAT IS ALL I ASK.
I am 63. I will never voluntarily take another shot under any circumstances.
In a sane world, bypassing the body's mucosal defense to inject toxic cell culture made from other species, along with toxicant metal adjuvants would be considered an abomination. Of course it elicits an immune response just like any other poison.