Hi Phillip, seems to me we are at risk of "excess deaths" becoming normalised. As the prior period death levels are replaced by current ('21, '22, '23) levels, going forward the numbers of deaths will no longer register as "Excess". I believe this is already reflected in the excess numbers reported after Clown McGowan resigned
Good job Dr Altman and team, do not let up on this. I'll have an article on this as well in the fullness of time but what is CLEAR is that they need public pressure to keep this up an issue. Email, ring, ask.
The list provided by Phillip is for the second vote, isn't it? What about the 35N/4Y vote the day before - have you found out any more about this as was discussed in the comments under Phillip's last blog on this subject? So many LNPers stayed away that day that it might warrant some emails/phonecalls to them as well - or are the ones who showed the next day and voted Yes now excused? Not sure what went on there...look forward to your article on this...
Yes Phillip's list is for vote 2. Suggest the previous vote wouldn't get off the ground due to the terms of the committee - people don't want to be beholden to the whims of other parties. That's just the nature of politics. All of this is politics. Unfortunately, there isn't anything sexy or a grand reveal. It was never about the excess deaths.
Jacquie Lambie voted in the motion right before this one, according to the Hansard. Did she step out of the room or something? Linda Reynolds was present for a vote later on, too. So was Marielle Smith, Glenn Sterle, Tammy Tyrrell, and Murray Watt. I wonder whether they put the motion at the beginning of the session on purpose? What are we paying these people for...shoddy work ethic if nothing else. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansards/26449/&sid=0017
Did you see in the Hansard "Vacancy created by the death of Senator Andrew James Molan on 16 January 2023" I don't follow news - could this have been jab-related?
I've emailed most of them thanking them for making it obvious to the voters that they do not care about an excess death rate of 16% in their electorates and informed that they couldn't claim they didn't know as links to a couple articles are included. - standard auto responses back except from David Pollock and one of the greens. They just don't care or want to know
Most likely one of those close but just lost votes - manipulated IMO - senators who did not vote no doubt deliberate as well
There are a few decent senators and we know who they are, the rest are a despicable bunch of gutless cowards who I would not piss on even if they were on fire
They're not all there unfortunately, it goes to a 500 Error page for further details, and many email addresses are missing too. I've found all for No and Absent, posted here elsewhere just now.
The staggering ‘Diversity, Equity, Inclusion’ mind control program at the University of Florida; An entire bureaucracy; This is the future NOW; It has to be crushed
The University of Florida.
An entity in the State University System.
Endowment: $2.4 billion.
Annual budget: $6 billion.
Students: 56,000.
Staff: 14,800.
Christopher F. Rufo exposes (see also here and here and here) the University of Florida Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) program and the details:
The HR department held a training to lecture employees about their “white privilege,” “white fragility,” and the “‘unearned advantages’ of whiteness.” As part of their “personal journey,” white employees were encouraged to confront their pathological whiteness.
They learned mantras from twelve-step programs for overcoming their whiteness, including Racists Anonymous: “I have come to admit that I am powerless over my addiction to racism”; “We admit our collective history is rooted in white supremacy.”
University of Florida has created a radical DEI bureaucracy that promotes racial preferences in faculty hiring, encourages white employees to engage with a 12-step program called Racists Anonymous, and maintains segregated scholarships that violate civil rights law.
Officially, the university has reported that it hosts 31 DEI initiatives at a cost of $5 million per year. But I have obtained internal documents via Sunshine Law requests revealing the stunning scope, scale, and radicalism of UF’s DEI bureaucracy, which is embedded everywhere.
In 2020, UF planned out a huge number of diversity initiatives, including mandatory diversity training, an entire year focused on “racism,” a presidential task force to explore the university’s racist past, and recommendations for banning “historic racist imagery.”
In 2021, the university moved to create a massive “DEI infrastructure” and deploy DEI cadres to each division, school, and college. The embedded cadres were tasked with administering loyalty surveys to test faculty and staff’s “commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.”
According to documents, UF has created 1,018 “DEI initiatives” and the ideology has penetrated nearly all of its divisions: 73 percent “have a DEI committee” and “DEI officer”; 70 percent “espoused commitment to DEI”; 53 percent “have a DEI strategic plan.”
The university encourages racial preferences in hiring, with favored practices including “specific formal training in [DEI],” advertising jobs through “DEI identity” groups, using an “equity specialist” for search committees, and engaging in race-based recruiting and benchmarks.
—end of Rufo statement—
He paints a picture of university infiltration on a massive scale.
It would be impossible to install such a program without key players in MANY key positions.
The rest of the university employees are scared sheep and willing foot soldiers.
—The 12-step program as overt mind control.
People surrender their will, power of choice, intelligence, and sign on as slaves waiting for orders from above.
As I’ve been writing for some time now, these programs have nothing to do with equality of opportunity or meritocracy. They’re about who holds the power.
The rulers and enforcers of the USSR and China would find the U of Florida structure quite familiar.
Tyrants form collectives. It hardly matters what the “subject matter” is. The whole point is subjugation.
At the U of Florida, no doubt there was a point, along the way, when supervisors, department heads, deans, executives, and boards thought: “Well, all this is somewhat troubling, but we can live with it. It’ll progress to a certain level and then stop. These people couldn’t be actually trying to take over the University.”
But these people were, and they did.
That’s always the way it is. People don’t rise up and squash the criminals. They wait. And then one day it’s too late.
The criminals rely on The Group. The force of The Group. Not the ideas. Not the philosophy. Not the logic. Not on anything sensible. The thoughts the criminals spout and the theories—those are just the cover. The root is group intimidation. The calculation is: “We have enough force to overwhelm the individual.”
It’s war.
The idiots and the cowards and the passive ones refuse to see this.
That tells you something about the awesome lack of integrity residing in these high-minded professors who teach at the university level.
They turn their eyes away as a mob grabs control.
Upgrade to paid
What is happening at the U of Florida gives you a picture of an end-game. It’s not enough for white people to admit some level of guilt they’re not even guilty of. It’s not enough to bow down like ridiculous asses and ask for forgiveness from a bunch of criminals. No. The program demands a confession that “white racism” is beyond the ability of white people to shed. It’s baked in. Therefore, surrender to a higher power. Guess who that power is.
Can you imagine what actually goes on in some of these perverted 12-step sessions?
People lining up to be flagellated and to flagellate themselves.
Who wins the top prize? I’ll tell you who. Not the “confessing sinners.” It’s the sadists running the show. They win.
At a University that prides itself on intellectual achievement.
That’s the cherry on this cake of mold.
Some readers will imagine the program at the University of Florida is an atypical one-off. That’s hardly the case.
Nearly every large US university is somewhere along the path to its own version of a DEI mind control horror show.
The criminal infiltrators are encountering little resistance. Many of their victims mistakenly believe they can earn a pass by merely paying lip service to Critical Race Theory. That isn’t how the game works.
And what happens to academic curricula? Philosophy, literature, history are transformed into what? Something grotesque devoted to the destruction of philosophy, literature, and history.
So-called liberals say they love Diversity, Equity, and Inclusivity.
It’s virtuous, they say.
It’s balancing the scales, they say.
It’s justice, they say.
As they make themselves easy prey.
Lambs for the slaughter.
Upgrade to paid
Welcome to blue-sky RNA Nanotech promises/hopes
File under The Bullshit Culture of Public Relations Science, sub-section “we’re sure this is going to be great.”
MIT News:
Engineers at MIT and the University of Massachusetts Medical School have designed a new type of nanoparticle that can be administered to the lungs, where it can deliver messenger RNA encoding useful proteins.
With further development, these particles could offer an inhalable treatment for cystic fibrosis and other diseases of the lung, the researchers say.
“This is the first demonstration of highly efficient delivery of RNA to the lungs in mice. We are hopeful that it can be used to treat or repair a range of genetic diseases, including cystic fibrosis,” says Daniel Anderson, a professor in MIT’s Department of Chemical Engineering…
Now let’s take apart this tap dance on a make-believe cloud…
The nanoparticles force the lungs to produce useful proteins. Uh-huh. Let’s see a list of these proteins. And then let’s see the test results that prove the lungs ARE, in fact, producing each one of the proteins every time the nanoparticles are inserted.
Where is all that evidence?
And how many mice were there?
And where is the evidence no harm was done?
Because it turns out that SAYING something and PROVING something may be the work of two different departments.
These particles could treat diseases of the lung “with further development.” Uh-huh. How much further development? Because I can fly to Jupiter on gossamer wings with a whole lot of further development.
And this MIT research was carried out on the lungs of…mice? The last time I looked, mice were not humans. I’m going to go out on a limb and say there are many differences between mice and humans. Size, shape, dynamics, infrastructure, the ability to say or not say, for instance, “I feel like my lungs are on fire and they’re burning up fast. What was that you injected me with?”
These nanoparticles will someday be able to treat “genetic diseases?” You know, before you can call a disease genetic, you have to be able to treat it successfully with gene therapy. That’s right.
Otherwise, claiming the disease is genetic in origin is just speculation, a shot in the dark. For instance—and I know you don’t want to hear this—a malfunctioning gene you claim causes cancer could be, at best, an INTERMEDIATE cause, behind which lurks a toxic chemical the patient was exposed to. The chemical is shooting bullets into the gene.
Other than all that, the MIT announcement is perfect.
How much funding are you MIT boys looking for? You want me to write a check for…how much?
What are the odds I’m going to see a return on my investment? Or is this the sort of grant that doesn’t require significant results?
Send my attorney, Gloria Torquemada, a full prospectus and we’ll get back to you.
Maybe.
In a few years.
Possibly.
-- Jon Rappoport
Episode 46 of Rappoport Podcasts — “The 2 Big Reasons Why Viruses Don’t Exist” — is now posted on my substack. It’s a blockbuster. To listen to this podcast, click here. To learn more about This Episode of Rappoport Podcasts, click here.
The ONLY time the Gallery has FULL participation is when THEIR salary is being increased! What a super government??? Sticking yr head in the sand is simply not an option! Australian citizens are onto u and we have had a gut-full of our money supporting yr blatant disinterest in what is happening in this once great country. You're all on a short leash unless u step up to the current reality.....it is yr job to "listen" to yr constituents NOT turn a blind eye and deaf ears. Get with the program before u slip into insignificance.
I knew somebody would ask that.....I have not had time to look. Maybe somebody could post the names and contact details in Comments?
Hi Phillip, seems to me we are at risk of "excess deaths" becoming normalised. As the prior period death levels are replaced by current ('21, '22, '23) levels, going forward the numbers of deaths will no longer register as "Excess". I believe this is already reflected in the excess numbers reported after Clown McGowan resigned
Astute observation.
I do not censor. I have never censored.
No Allman-Payne, Penny QLD Greens senator.allman-payne@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3410 (07) 3001 8170
No Ayres, Tim NSW ALP senator.ayres@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3469 (02) 9159 9330
No Brown, Carol TAS ALP senator.carol.brown@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3336 (03) 6231 0099
No Chisholm, Anthony QLD ALP senator.chisholm@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3103 (07) 3881 3710
No Ciccone, Raff VIC ALP senator.ciccone@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3226 (03) 98942098
No Cox, Dorinda WA Greens senator.cox@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3069 (08) 9228 3277
No Farrell, Don SA ALP senator.farrell@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 7420 (08)82318400
No Faruqi, Mehreen NSW Greens senator.faruqi@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3095 (02) 9211 1500
No Gallagher, Katy ACT ALP senator.katy.gallagher@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 7400 (02) 6230 0411
No Green, Nita QLD ALP senator.green@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3580 (07) 4031 3498
No Grogan, Karen SA ALP senator.grogan@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3830 (08) 8269 6022
No Hanson-Young, Sarah SA Greens senator.hanson-young@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3430 (08) 5550 7637
No Lines, Sue WA ALP senator.lines@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3300 (08) 5550 3336
No McAllister, Jenny NSW ALP jennifer.mcallister@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3443 (02) 9719 8100
No McCarthy, Malarndirri NT ALP Senator.McCarthy@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3094 (08) 8941 0003
No McKim, Nick TAS Greens senator.mckim@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3601 (03) 6224 8899
No Payman, Fatima WA ALP Senator.Payman@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3417 (08) 5550 3915
No Pocock, Barbara SA Greens senator.barbara.pocock@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3176 (08) 8272 7575
No Polley, Helen TAS ALP senator.polley@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3422 (03) 6331 2599
No Pratt, Louise WA ALP senator.pratt@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3189 (08) 9277 1502
No Rice, Janet VIC Greens senator.rice@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3225 (03) 9381 1446
No Sheldon, Tony NSW ALP senator.sheldon@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3736 (02) 9719 1078
No Shoebridge, David NSW Greens senator.shoebridge@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3169 (02) 8073 7400
No Steele-John, Jordon WA Greens senator.steele-john@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3646 (08) 6245 3310
No Stewart, Jana VIC ALP senator.stewart@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3004 03 9232 8120
No Urquhart, Anne TAS ALP senator.urquhart@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3434 03 6423 1933
No Walsh, Jess VIC ALP senator.walsh@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3744 (03) 9381 5448
No Waters, Larissa QLD Greens senator.waters@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3684 (07) 3367 0566
No Whish-Wilson, Peter TAS Greens senator.whish-wilson@aph.gov.au 02 7010 1977 (03) 5550 4091
No White, Linda VIC ALP senator.white@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3154 (03)96392798
Absent – Away from seat? Lambie, Jacqui TAS JLN senator.lambie@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3614 (03) 6431 3112
Absent – Late Reynolds, Linda WA Liberal senator.reynolds@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3054 (08) 9477 5411
Absent – Late Smith, Marielle SA ALP senator.marielle.smith@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3777 (08) 8340 0444
Absent – Late Sterle, Glenn WA ALP senator.sterle@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3615 (08) 9455 1420
Absent – Late Tyrrell, Tammy TAS JLN senator.tyrrell@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3422 (03) 9070 1910
Absent – Late Watt, Murray QLD ALP senator.watt@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 7190 (07) 5531 1033
Absent Bilyk, Catryna TAS ALP senator.bilyk@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3349 03 6229 4444
Absent Cadell, Ross NSW Nationals senator.cadell@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3413 (02) 6492 0586
Absent Dodson, Patrick WA ALP senator.dodson@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3746 (08) 9193 5955
Absent Hume, Jane VIC Liberal senator.hume@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3090 (03) 9428 1773
Absent O’Neill, Deborah NSW ALP senator.oneill@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3882 02 4367 4565
Absent Paterson, James VIC Liberal senator.paterson@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3719 03 9690 2201
Absent Payne, Marise NSW Liberal senator.payne@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3024 (02) 9687 8466
Absent Pocock, David ACT Independent senator.david.pocock@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3117 (02) 6247 6444
Absent Thorpe, Lidia VIC Independent senator.thorpe@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3353 (03) 9070 1950
Absent Wong, Penny SA ALP senator.wong@aph.gov.au 02 6277 7500 (08) 8212 8272
Yes Antic, Alex SA Liberal
Yes Askew, Wendy TAS Liberal
Yes Babet, Ralph VIC UAP
Yes Birmingham, Simon SA Liberal
Yes Bragg, Andrew NSW Liberal
Yes Brockman, Slade WA Liberal
Yes Canavan, Matthew QLD Nationals
Yes Cash, Michaelia WA Liberal
Yes Chandler, Claire TAS Liberal
Yes Colbeck, Richard TAS Liberal
Yes Davey, Perin NSW Nationals
Yes Duniam, Jonathon TAS Liberal
Yes Fawcett, David SA Liberal
Yes Hanson, Pauline QLD ON
Yes Henderson, Sarah VIC Liberal
Yes Hughes, Hollie NSW Liberal
Yes Liddle, Kerrynne SA Liberal
Yes McDonald, Susan QLD LibNatQld
Yes McGrath, James QLD LibNatQld
Yes McKenzie, Bridget VIC Nationals
Yes McLachlan, Andrew SA Liberal
Yes Nampijinpa Price, Jacinta NT CountryLibs
Yes O’Sullivan, Matt WA Liberal
Yes Rennick, Gerard QLD LibNatQld
Yes Roberts, Malcolm QLD ON
Yes Ruston, Anne SA Liberal
Yes Scarr, Paul QLD Liberal
Yes Smith, Dean WA Liberal
Yes Van, David VIC Liberal
woop there it is
Thank you for your continued hard work into this disastrous situation..
I cannot believe we are living through this and so few are fighting
Congratulations to those hero’s who are not letting up including yourself
Good job Dr Altman and team, do not let up on this. I'll have an article on this as well in the fullness of time but what is CLEAR is that they need public pressure to keep this up an issue. Email, ring, ask.
The list provided by Phillip is for the second vote, isn't it? What about the 35N/4Y vote the day before - have you found out any more about this as was discussed in the comments under Phillip's last blog on this subject? So many LNPers stayed away that day that it might warrant some emails/phonecalls to them as well - or are the ones who showed the next day and voted Yes now excused? Not sure what went on there...look forward to your article on this...
Yes Phillip's list is for vote 2. Suggest the previous vote wouldn't get off the ground due to the terms of the committee - people don't want to be beholden to the whims of other parties. That's just the nature of politics. All of this is politics. Unfortunately, there isn't anything sexy or a grand reveal. It was never about the excess deaths.
I never dreamed that I would in my lifetime come to live under communist/totalitarian terrifying government rule.
We partied in the 80s and 90s when things were good.
Jacquie Lambie voted in the motion right before this one, according to the Hansard. Did she step out of the room or something? Linda Reynolds was present for a vote later on, too. So was Marielle Smith, Glenn Sterle, Tammy Tyrrell, and Murray Watt. I wonder whether they put the motion at the beginning of the session on purpose? What are we paying these people for...shoddy work ethic if nothing else. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansards/26449/&sid=0017
Did you see in the Hansard "Vacancy created by the death of Senator Andrew James Molan on 16 January 2023" I don't follow news - could this have been jab-related?
"Sudden cancer." Shame he seemed like an interesting man - Iraq operations leader but also knew exactly what was happening with the war machine. I'm going to get his books before they are banned. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jan/17/liberal-senator-jim-molan-dies-aged-72-after-sudden-decline-in-health
I've emailed most of them thanking them for making it obvious to the voters that they do not care about an excess death rate of 16% in their electorates and informed that they couldn't claim they didn't know as links to a couple articles are included. - standard auto responses back except from David Pollock and one of the greens. They just don't care or want to know
I think they "trust" the "experts"? Infuriating. Not willing to actually work/research/read/think. Too much fluoride or TV etc etc?
What line did they use in the reply? Anything of interest? ie do they think it isn't true or?
To investigate this further please supply more personal details i.e not doing anything further
Most likely one of those close but just lost votes - manipulated IMO - senators who did not vote no doubt deliberate as well
There are a few decent senators and we know who they are, the rest are a despicable bunch of gutless cowards who I would not piss on even if they were on fire
Do you have the names of the liberal and national party members who didn't vote?
--Cadell, Ross NSW Nats ph? (02) 6492 0586 and (02) 6277 3413
--Hume, Jane VIC Libs senator.hume@aph.gov.au (03) 9428 1773 and (02) 6277 3090
--Paterson, James VIC Libs senator.paterson@aph.gov.au 02 6277 3719 and 03 9690 2201
--Payne, Marise NSW Libs senator.payne@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3024 and (02) 9687 8466
--Reynolds, Linda WA Libs senator.reynolds@aph.gov.au (02) 6277 3054 and (08) 9477 5411
All up 16 Senators didn't vote, including 6 who were there for other issues that same day (one before, the rest later in the session).
I'm not impressed and not surprised they've removed contact directory on the website
All the contact details are here...what website do you mean? Also I easily found all their emails on their personal pages. https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Parliamentarian_Search_Results?q=&sen=1&par=-1&gen=0&ps=0
They're not all there unfortunately, it goes to a 500 Error page for further details, and many email addresses are missing too. I've found all for No and Absent, posted here elsewhere just now.
That's strange I'm not finding that...can you show a link of what you mean?
Here are all the emails of the 'no' votes in alphabetical order. It took me 5 minutes to do
Emails of Senators who voted no
senator.allman-payne@aph.gov.au
senator.ayres@aph.gov.au
senator.carol.brown@aph.gov.au
senator.chisholm@aph.gov.au
senator.ciccone@aph.gov.au
senator.cox@aph.gov.au
senator.farrell@aph.gov.au
senator.faruqi@aph.gov.au
senator.katy.gallagher@aph.gov.au
senator.green@aph.gov.au
senator.grogan@aph.gov.au
senator.hanson-young@aph.gov.au
senator.lines@aph.gov.au
jennifer.mcallister@aph.gov.au
Senator.McCarthy@aph.gov.au
senator.mckim@aph.gov.au
Senator.Payman@aph.gov.au
senator.barbara.pocock@aph.gov.au
senator.polley@aph.gov.au
senator.pratt@aph.gov.au
senator.rice@aph.gov.au
senator.sheldon@aph.gov.au
senator.shoebridge@aph.gov.au
senator.steele-john@aph.gov.au
senator.stewart@aph.gov.au
senator.urquhart@aph.gov.au
senator.walsh@aph.gov.au
senator.waters@aph.gov.au
senator.whish-wilson@aph.gov.au
Senator.White@aph.gov.au
Thank you
I've updated Payne and Paterson's phone numbers
Very revealing. There are so many out there that don’t want to know.
so even altman has censored me .. a bunch of 2 faced cowards delete altman
A Staggering Mind Control Program in Florida
And, RNA injected into mice at MIT
JON RAPPOPORT
JUN 1
SHARE
The staggering ‘Diversity, Equity, Inclusion’ mind control program at the University of Florida; An entire bureaucracy; This is the future NOW; It has to be crushed
The University of Florida.
An entity in the State University System.
Endowment: $2.4 billion.
Annual budget: $6 billion.
Students: 56,000.
Staff: 14,800.
Christopher F. Rufo exposes (see also here and here and here) the University of Florida Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) program and the details:
The HR department held a training to lecture employees about their “white privilege,” “white fragility,” and the “‘unearned advantages’ of whiteness.” As part of their “personal journey,” white employees were encouraged to confront their pathological whiteness.
They learned mantras from twelve-step programs for overcoming their whiteness, including Racists Anonymous: “I have come to admit that I am powerless over my addiction to racism”; “We admit our collective history is rooted in white supremacy.”
University of Florida has created a radical DEI bureaucracy that promotes racial preferences in faculty hiring, encourages white employees to engage with a 12-step program called Racists Anonymous, and maintains segregated scholarships that violate civil rights law.
Officially, the university has reported that it hosts 31 DEI initiatives at a cost of $5 million per year. But I have obtained internal documents via Sunshine Law requests revealing the stunning scope, scale, and radicalism of UF’s DEI bureaucracy, which is embedded everywhere.
In 2020, UF planned out a huge number of diversity initiatives, including mandatory diversity training, an entire year focused on “racism,” a presidential task force to explore the university’s racist past, and recommendations for banning “historic racist imagery.”
In 2021, the university moved to create a massive “DEI infrastructure” and deploy DEI cadres to each division, school, and college. The embedded cadres were tasked with administering loyalty surveys to test faculty and staff’s “commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.”
According to documents, UF has created 1,018 “DEI initiatives” and the ideology has penetrated nearly all of its divisions: 73 percent “have a DEI committee” and “DEI officer”; 70 percent “espoused commitment to DEI”; 53 percent “have a DEI strategic plan.”
The university encourages racial preferences in hiring, with favored practices including “specific formal training in [DEI],” advertising jobs through “DEI identity” groups, using an “equity specialist” for search committees, and engaging in race-based recruiting and benchmarks.
—end of Rufo statement—
He paints a picture of university infiltration on a massive scale.
It would be impossible to install such a program without key players in MANY key positions.
The rest of the university employees are scared sheep and willing foot soldiers.
—The 12-step program as overt mind control.
People surrender their will, power of choice, intelligence, and sign on as slaves waiting for orders from above.
As I’ve been writing for some time now, these programs have nothing to do with equality of opportunity or meritocracy. They’re about who holds the power.
The rulers and enforcers of the USSR and China would find the U of Florida structure quite familiar.
Tyrants form collectives. It hardly matters what the “subject matter” is. The whole point is subjugation.
At the U of Florida, no doubt there was a point, along the way, when supervisors, department heads, deans, executives, and boards thought: “Well, all this is somewhat troubling, but we can live with it. It’ll progress to a certain level and then stop. These people couldn’t be actually trying to take over the University.”
But these people were, and they did.
That’s always the way it is. People don’t rise up and squash the criminals. They wait. And then one day it’s too late.
The criminals rely on The Group. The force of The Group. Not the ideas. Not the philosophy. Not the logic. Not on anything sensible. The thoughts the criminals spout and the theories—those are just the cover. The root is group intimidation. The calculation is: “We have enough force to overwhelm the individual.”
It’s war.
The idiots and the cowards and the passive ones refuse to see this.
That tells you something about the awesome lack of integrity residing in these high-minded professors who teach at the university level.
They turn their eyes away as a mob grabs control.
Upgrade to paid
What is happening at the U of Florida gives you a picture of an end-game. It’s not enough for white people to admit some level of guilt they’re not even guilty of. It’s not enough to bow down like ridiculous asses and ask for forgiveness from a bunch of criminals. No. The program demands a confession that “white racism” is beyond the ability of white people to shed. It’s baked in. Therefore, surrender to a higher power. Guess who that power is.
Can you imagine what actually goes on in some of these perverted 12-step sessions?
People lining up to be flagellated and to flagellate themselves.
Who wins the top prize? I’ll tell you who. Not the “confessing sinners.” It’s the sadists running the show. They win.
At a University that prides itself on intellectual achievement.
That’s the cherry on this cake of mold.
Some readers will imagine the program at the University of Florida is an atypical one-off. That’s hardly the case.
Nearly every large US university is somewhere along the path to its own version of a DEI mind control horror show.
The criminal infiltrators are encountering little resistance. Many of their victims mistakenly believe they can earn a pass by merely paying lip service to Critical Race Theory. That isn’t how the game works.
And what happens to academic curricula? Philosophy, literature, history are transformed into what? Something grotesque devoted to the destruction of philosophy, literature, and history.
So-called liberals say they love Diversity, Equity, and Inclusivity.
It’s virtuous, they say.
It’s balancing the scales, they say.
It’s justice, they say.
As they make themselves easy prey.
Lambs for the slaughter.
Upgrade to paid
Welcome to blue-sky RNA Nanotech promises/hopes
File under The Bullshit Culture of Public Relations Science, sub-section “we’re sure this is going to be great.”
MIT News:
Engineers at MIT and the University of Massachusetts Medical School have designed a new type of nanoparticle that can be administered to the lungs, where it can deliver messenger RNA encoding useful proteins.
With further development, these particles could offer an inhalable treatment for cystic fibrosis and other diseases of the lung, the researchers say.
“This is the first demonstration of highly efficient delivery of RNA to the lungs in mice. We are hopeful that it can be used to treat or repair a range of genetic diseases, including cystic fibrosis,” says Daniel Anderson, a professor in MIT’s Department of Chemical Engineering…
Now let’s take apart this tap dance on a make-believe cloud…
The nanoparticles force the lungs to produce useful proteins. Uh-huh. Let’s see a list of these proteins. And then let’s see the test results that prove the lungs ARE, in fact, producing each one of the proteins every time the nanoparticles are inserted.
Where is all that evidence?
And how many mice were there?
And where is the evidence no harm was done?
Because it turns out that SAYING something and PROVING something may be the work of two different departments.
These particles could treat diseases of the lung “with further development.” Uh-huh. How much further development? Because I can fly to Jupiter on gossamer wings with a whole lot of further development.
And this MIT research was carried out on the lungs of…mice? The last time I looked, mice were not humans. I’m going to go out on a limb and say there are many differences between mice and humans. Size, shape, dynamics, infrastructure, the ability to say or not say, for instance, “I feel like my lungs are on fire and they’re burning up fast. What was that you injected me with?”
These nanoparticles will someday be able to treat “genetic diseases?” You know, before you can call a disease genetic, you have to be able to treat it successfully with gene therapy. That’s right.
Otherwise, claiming the disease is genetic in origin is just speculation, a shot in the dark. For instance—and I know you don’t want to hear this—a malfunctioning gene you claim causes cancer could be, at best, an INTERMEDIATE cause, behind which lurks a toxic chemical the patient was exposed to. The chemical is shooting bullets into the gene.
Other than all that, the MIT announcement is perfect.
How much funding are you MIT boys looking for? You want me to write a check for…how much?
What are the odds I’m going to see a return on my investment? Or is this the sort of grant that doesn’t require significant results?
Send my attorney, Gloria Torquemada, a full prospectus and we’ll get back to you.
Maybe.
In a few years.
Possibly.
-- Jon Rappoport
Episode 46 of Rappoport Podcasts — “The 2 Big Reasons Why Viruses Don’t Exist” — is now posted on my substack. It’s a blockbuster. To listen to this podcast, click here. To learn more about This Episode of Rappoport Podcasts, click here.
SHARE
LIKE
COMMENT
RESTACK
Originally posted on
Jon Rappoport
Jon Rappoport
Jon Rappoport
Subscribe
The Hottest Takes on Culture
© 2023 Joseph Sansone, M.S., PhD
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
Unsubscribe
Start writing
The ONLY time the Gallery has FULL participation is when THEIR salary is being increased! What a super government??? Sticking yr head in the sand is simply not an option! Australian citizens are onto u and we have had a gut-full of our money supporting yr blatant disinterest in what is happening in this once great country. You're all on a short leash unless u step up to the current reality.....it is yr job to "listen" to yr constituents NOT turn a blind eye and deaf ears. Get with the program before u slip into insignificance.