THE GREAT COVID DEBATE 2024
Held 14 March 2024 at NSW Parliament House - Sydney, Australia
Until now there has been a massive effort to suppress voices arguing against the Australian Government’s pandemic policies and the so-called COVID-19 “vaccines”. Despite monumental government ineptitude, recklessness, incompetence and the destruction of lives and our economic security, the government continues to resist a Royal Commission into COVID or a Senate inquiry into tens of thousands of unexplained, unexpected, non-Covid deaths which have occurred since the “vaccine” rollouts.
But voices of reason cannot be suppressed forever.
I applaud the NSW Government allowing Libertarian MP John Ruddick and Australian Newspaper journalist “Jack the Insider” to debate the COVID issue at Parliament House, Sydney (14 March 2024). The debate, the first of its kind, was broadcast on ADH TV (www.adh.tv on your mobile device or computer).
CLICK HERE to view the 60 minute debate including question time.
My take on the debate
I believe “Jack the Insider” (Peter) firmly expressed his honest opinions but unfortunately conflated the gene-based Covid “vaccines” with historical conventional vaccines such as Smallpox vaccines. This “anti-vax” argument is hollow and it is a pity much of Peter’s presentation was wasted discussing historical conventional vaccines. Peter obviously was unaware that the COVID “vaccines” were based on gene technology unlike any previous vaccine. He also repeated the mantra that the COVID “vaccines” saved up to 20 million lives but he did not know this was based on discredited modelling.
I listened carefully to the factual accounts of John Ruddick and could not find fault with his presentation. It was a pity that the integrity of certain commentators (Hoody and Johnny) and John Ruddick himself were the subject of unwarranted disparaging comment. I would have thought that personal attacks should have played no part in this debate or questions.
There is absolutely no reliable data to substantiate the claim that the COVID “vaccines” saved 20 million of lives but there is data to suggest that the COVID “vaccines” killed more than COVID itself.
All in all - a good debate and I thank both Peter and John for participating.
DO VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM?
While it can be argued that certain conventional vaccines have contributed significantly to public health (eg Smallpox vaccine), it should not be assumed that vaccines in general are either safe or effective without supporting credible clinical data. The pharmaceutical industry wants you to believe that if they call something a “vaccine” it is therefore “safe”………Wrong. This was the argument of Jack the Insider.
One of the great questions facing the public is - Do vaccines cause autism? Autism was extremely rare 5 decades ago. Now, after compulsory childhood vaccine schedules were introduced, the incidence is 1 in 34!
This is an incredible important question and I urge everyone to take the time to look at the fact, look at the data and then come to your own conclusions. Vaccine manufacturers have never conducted a study to show that vaccines do not cause autism. The onus of proof has been reversed and placed on the consumer.
Prior to Covid, I must admit, I did not really consider this question. But after all the lies heaped upon us during Covid, I think it is prudent to have a rethink.
The follow Substacks present an incredible amount of information on the topic.
CLICK HERE for a Substack from “A Midwestern Doctor” of 22 July 2023 and CLICK HERE for a Substack from Steve Kirsch of 17 June 2023. An enormous amount of information is presented in these Substack that you will not find anywhere else. I urge you to take the time to read.
IMPORTANT SYDNEY EVENT
There are a few seats remaining…..be quick.
Also, come and meet the speakers……a unique opportunity, I’m told there are a handful of tickets remaining.
DISCLAIMER:
The information and personal opinions presented in this Substack is based on or derived from sources which I believe are credible and usually reliable. Any inadvertent errors or inaccuracies in my Substacks which come to my notice will be corrected as soon as possible. I endeavour to reference any relevant published information and provide links to websites so readers can do their own research. The opinions expressed are not intended nor should they be interpreted to be medical advice. I do not accept any liability for comments placed on my Substack and my failure to respond to any potentially defamatory or contentious comment should not be taken as passive or otherwise approval by myself. I neither seek nor receive any financial compensation for my writings.
MY SUBSTACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE ENTIRELY FREE. I ENDEAVOUR TO BRING YOU THE TRUTH. PLEASE SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THAT IS ALL I ASK.
The debate was excruciating to watch. Peter showed his arrogant ignorance on the subjects of Andrew Wakefield and the altered ABS all cause mortality figures. Your comments and the way he dismissed you were appalling. And on the subject of childhood vaccines, my 5 month old granddaughter got injected with the usual MMR ‘vax’ but they added the meningococcal injection one to it. The perfectly healthy child had a cardiac arrest that night and nearly died. Subsequently she was on beta blockers for 6 years. Her heart still beats too fast. 🥹. Our children are given a minimum of 53 vaccinations prior to starting school. Andrew Wakefield was right. They have no idea of what this onslaught can do to an infant, particularly as at 18 months they get 8 at once!
Painful to watch especially the "answers" to good questions afterwards. Great that you and Claire picked up on the flawed death-predicting models and ABS statistical manipulations; I enjoyed the pointed question about medical ethics and AHPRA censorship, which was somehow unheard of by this gentleman?
Some of the other blatant "errors" in the case for the Narrative that I noted:
- there was "no treatment" possible, "nothing could be done" for "Covid patients";
- excess deaths were due to "consequences" of prior Covid infection (like "long Covid" no doubt!);
- 40% in NSW ICU were "unvaccinated" - by what definition?;
- the "most recent figures" (aka those conveniently altered by ABS statistical magic tricks) show a "decline in deaths".
It became obvious that the PsyOp memes were being recycled: "We WILL have another pandemic"; the Quarantine facilities "will be useful in future"; all the usual diatribe against "antivaxxers", "defiantly unvaccinated", "grifters, cranks, charlatans" with "intellectual poverty"; Byron Bay's low childhood vaccinations, a "middle-class affectation" for those "addicted to counter narratives"; the usual Andrew Wakefield accusations of "fabrication"; "you DO NOT PICK AND CHOOSE ABOUT VACCINES". This fellow was either a prime victim of propaganda or a clever...no I think the former, actually.
And his data? Two pictures of unfortunate victims of measles and smallpox. Our vulnerability according to him was that the States run health. Thank goodness the WHO will soon take over!! OMG, he no doubt looks forward to more "miracle" injections. Oh well.