There’s no doubt there’s been an upward trend for the past couple of decades, likely involving the likes of worse diets, sedentary lifestyles, environmental/chemical factors, the avoidance of healthy sunshine and the likes, but the change to both rapid onset and rare cancers and the increase in diagnoses of these among much younger people is indicative of only one thing … that which cannot be named.
Sad to say I know four turbo cancer death victims since January. All jabbed, ages 67, 70, 6x, 43. None of the relations have acknowledged any connection with the jabs. One of the victims said she wished she had never had the jabs.
I have to thank good old Norman for being one of my wake-up-stimuli: when the first Australian women started dying after the first clot-shot (AZ), he was quick to blame them for "not going to Emergency with their (even mild) headaches"!! His Coronablast was obviously one of the PsyOps put in place to attract the ABC-true-believers (I was one of them) - and amazingly he is STILL GOING!
We need to be careful, though, not to assume that the cancer fallout is solely a result of the DNA contamination and other add-ons like SV40, etc. The mRNA platform was always biologically ridiculous and needs banning altogether, whether they "clean up the contamination" or not.
Simian Virus 40, is a known carcinogen, which allegedly contaminated some of the polio vaccines in the 1950's, it was linked to the fprmation of pleomorphic adenomas, of the salivary glands, the question has to be asked , did any of these preparations contain SV40 ?and if so, what was SV 40 doing in such a preparation ?. Thank You Rosemary , for highlighting the dangers of m RNA and the associated link [not mentioned] to the highly inflammatory Spike protein, question, has this m RNA been included in the current batches of FLU vaccine, and if so WHY?
The fella, I’m not sure of his name-who says-these vaccines have been through the same [rigorous] testing as other vaccines caught my ear-the same testing-yeah, stuff all!!
But for sure Swan is caught out bare faced lying!
Well kept Danielle! I’d given up watching tv at that stage, but it’s the same people, as where I’d left off, except I didn’t recognise the first lady with the big hair. I think it’s a lady, at least.
In Australia, the longer-term increase in cancers in people aged 50 and under is probably due, in part, to lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in many people due to the slip-slop-slap campaign: slip on a shirt, slop on sunscreen and slap on a hat. This lowers vitamin D3 production. Vitamin D3 is converted primarily in the liver to 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which the immune system depends upon.
In the absence of vitamin D3 supplementation (and there is almost none in food of any kind), it would be best to get some UV-B skin exposure to get at least some vitamin D3, even though all UV-B damages DNA and so increases the risk of skin cancer. Overall, higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels strongly protect against cancer and infections from bacteria, viruses and fungi/yeast.
The trouble is that even with one 25 microgram (1000 IU) vitamin D3 capsule a day (this is the largest capacity capsule which the government allows to be sold in retail stores) most people will have only a fraction of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D the immune system needs to work properly. Slip-slop-slap is perfectly good advice if the person is supplementing sufficient vitamin D3 all year round - but that requires a lot more than 1000 IU a day.
Governments, doctors and all other responsible people should have paid attention to Prof. Brighthope and others who tried to raise awareness of the crucial importance of vitamin D3 supplementation, in the first year of the pandemic. Even a doctor of the highest-possible rank - Professor of Medicine, Peter Ebeling, Head, Department of Medicine, Monash University - was ignored when he pointed out the need for vitamin D3 supplementation among those most affected by the pandemic in Victoria, in August 2020: the elderly, especially in care homes, and those with dark or black skin and who had sun-avoidant lifestyles. At that time, most COVID-19 cases outside nursing homes were among recent immigrants from Africa and the Middle East, in some particular suburbs of Melbourne. Many of those worst affected were Muslims. https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/healthreport/is-there-a-link- between-vitamin-d-and-coronavirus/12566324 .
Governments and many doctors regard this 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) level of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D as sufficient for full health. However, the real figure is 50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L = 1 part in 20,000,000 by mass), since this is the level the immune system needs to function properly.
Please see the research cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ which shows, clearly, that we need to supplement vitamin D3 in sufficient quantities to attain 50 ng/mL circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D. This is needed to supply the intracrine (inside each cell) and paracrine (to nearby cells, often of different types) signaling systems of many types of immune cell, and some other cell types which are involved in neurodevelopment. These signaling systems are crucial to each cell's ability to alter its behavior in response to its changing circumstances. Neither vitamin D3 nor 25-hydroxyvitamin D function as hormones. They are not signaling molecules.
This page begins with 2014 research from Massachusetts General Hospital which shows the risk of post-operative infections increasing dramatically the further below 50 ng/mL the patients' pre-operative 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was. The risk of both surgical site infections and hospital acquired infections was about 2.5% for patients whose pre-operative 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 50 ng/mL or more.
Most people have 10 to 25 ng/mL (25 to 62.5 nmol/L using the units used in Australia, the UK, New Zealand and perhaps Canada) unless they are supplementing vitamin D3 properly or have recently had a lot of (cancer risk increasing) ultraviolet B exposure of their ideally white skin. In this study, the risk of each of these two kinds of post-operative infection rose to 25% for patients whose pre-operative 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 20 ng/mL. Some people - especially the elderly, those suffering from obesity, those with brown or black skin and/or sun avoidant lifestyles - have levels below 10 ng/mL.
Chauss et al. found permanently inflammatory Th1 regulatory lymphocytes in the lungs of hospitalised COVID-19 patients: "Autocrine vitamin D signaling switches off pro-inflammatory programs of Th1 cells" Nature Immunology 2021-11-11 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-021-01080-3. (They are actually studying intracrine signalling - autocrine is with the receptors on the outside of the cell, but here they are in the cytosol. I made the same mistake at first). My summary of this dense cell biology article, or at least of its preprint, is at: https://aminotheory.com/cv19/icu/#2021-Chauss. These cells, unlike the Th1 cells from healthy controls, failed to transition from their pro-inflammatory startup program to their anti-inflammatory shutdown program, despite detecting the condition to do so (high level of a complement protein). In the final article, researchers concluded that this failure was due largely or entirely to inadequate supplies of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of the patients was not available, but it is well known that people with even lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels than the poor levels in the general population (compared to 50 ng/mL) are most likely to develop severe COVID-19 symptoms.
Most doctors and immunologists have never heard of these 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) intracrine and paracrine signaling systems, which are unrelated to hormonal (endocrine) signaling.
Calcitriol functions as a hormone - a blood-borne, long distance, signaling molecule - when the kidneys maintain a very low level of it in the bloodstream, such as 0.05 to 0.1 ng/mL. This enables the kidneys to affect the behavior of several types of cell, all over the body, which are involved in calcium, phosphate and bone metabolism.
Many types of immune cell rely on 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol intracrine signaling in order to alter their behavior in response to their changing circumstances. When a cell-type specific condition is detected, the cells hydroxylate intracellular 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol, which functions as an intracrine agent (not a hormone) and binds with "vitamin D receptor" VDR molecules, which are also produced inside the cell in response to this condition. VDR is best thought of as the calcitriol receptor, since it binds strongly to this and only very weakly to vitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The bound complex finds its way to the nucleus where it binds with retinol X and the triple complex up- and down-regulates the transcription of dozens to hundred of genes, in a cell-type specific manner, so altering the production of mRNA molecules which direct the cell's protein synthesis mechanisms. The cell's behavior is changed by these changes to protein production.
See https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-how- much for bodyweight and obesity status based recommendations from New Jersey based Professor of Medicine on how much vitamin D3 to supplement, on average, per day to attain at least 50 ng/mL circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D. For 70 kg 154 lb body weight without obesity, this is about 125 micrograms a day, AKA 5000 IU. This sounds like a lot, but it is a gram every 22 years, and pharma-grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 a gram ex-factory.
He recently repeated these recommendations in an article co-written by two other professors - one of medicine and the other of pediatrics: Integrating Endocrine, Genomic, and Extra-Skeletal Benefits of Vitamin D into National and Regional Clinical Guidelines Sunil J. Wimalawansa, Scott T. Weiss and Bruce W. Hollis, Nutrients 2024-11-20 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/22/3969.
Interesting that the pathetic creatures are even acknowledging the problem. If it weren't so beyond tragic, I'd call the ABC the greatest comedy act of all time.
I can't believe that the doctors and scientists are still baffled. I am a lay person and saw a problem with these so-called vaccines when they were first talked about in 2020. So what is wrong with all these experts??? All bought out are they.
You may be interested in watching the latest Club Grubbery interview, regarding this program.
The ABC is a shameless propaganda machine of an incompetent government. On 14 July 2022, 7.30 Report stated that "For people aged between the age of 50 to 69 the unvaccinated were nearly 37 times more likely to die. While in the oldest age group, the virus was 16 times more fatal for the unvaccinated.” Say no more.
Yes, of course they would say that wouldn't they. Willfully ignorant in my opinion. But of course the ABC and SBS are fully bought and reveal this by their very bias towards big Pharma and government lies.
Disgraceful, we had Triple J on the other day because the music is okay but as soon as they talk- we change the radio station. Anyway we didn't change it quick enough and we caught a brief intro for a discussion about "fake doms" like dominatrix in relationships. I don't even know, but I know it's disgusting as teenagers should not be exposed to these ideas like they are normal; it is the serious corruption of our culture.
Indeed, it was a sham and a shame of a show. My deep sympathy is for the cancer sufferers depicted in the show.
The positive I take from this disgraceful ignore-the -elephant-in -the -room journalism, is that there must be a lot of public discussion about turbo cancers going on. Hence the perceived need of abcdefail to do this bs story. Since most of us are seeing the cancers all around us, in our families, friends and communities, it is definitely high in people's concerns at present.
There’s no doubt there’s been an upward trend for the past couple of decades, likely involving the likes of worse diets, sedentary lifestyles, environmental/chemical factors, the avoidance of healthy sunshine and the likes, but the change to both rapid onset and rare cancers and the increase in diagnoses of these among much younger people is indicative of only one thing … that which cannot be named.
Sad to say I know four turbo cancer death victims since January. All jabbed, ages 67, 70, 6x, 43. None of the relations have acknowledged any connection with the jabs. One of the victims said she wished she had never had the jabs.
same
I have to thank good old Norman for being one of my wake-up-stimuli: when the first Australian women started dying after the first clot-shot (AZ), he was quick to blame them for "not going to Emergency with their (even mild) headaches"!! His Coronablast was obviously one of the PsyOps put in place to attract the ABC-true-believers (I was one of them) - and amazingly he is STILL GOING!
We need to be careful, though, not to assume that the cancer fallout is solely a result of the DNA contamination and other add-ons like SV40, etc. The mRNA platform was always biologically ridiculous and needs banning altogether, whether they "clean up the contamination" or not.
Simian Virus 40, is a known carcinogen, which allegedly contaminated some of the polio vaccines in the 1950's, it was linked to the fprmation of pleomorphic adenomas, of the salivary glands, the question has to be asked , did any of these preparations contain SV40 ?and if so, what was SV 40 doing in such a preparation ?. Thank You Rosemary , for highlighting the dangers of m RNA and the associated link [not mentioned] to the highly inflammatory Spike protein, question, has this m RNA been included in the current batches of FLU vaccine, and if so WHY?
Check this out from 3 years ago and listen to what “expert” Norman Swan has to say.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AhpuFFcRc0s&pp=ygUUYWJjIGNvdmlkIGNvbW1lcmNpYWw%3D
What a bare-faced LIAR!
The fella, I’m not sure of his name-who says-these vaccines have been through the same [rigorous] testing as other vaccines caught my ear-the same testing-yeah, stuff all!!
But for sure Swan is caught out bare faced lying!
Well kept Danielle! I’d given up watching tv at that stage, but it’s the same people, as where I’d left off, except I didn’t recognise the first lady with the big hair. I think it’s a lady, at least.
I’m fairly sure that he’s another doctor, although neither are specialists in infectious disease.
I really don’t know who most of these people are, ABC celebrities apparently. 🤷🏻♀️
This particular clip is the best example of their lying and drug-pushing propaganda that I saw throughout the entire fake pandemic.
In Australia, the longer-term increase in cancers in people aged 50 and under is probably due, in part, to lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in many people due to the slip-slop-slap campaign: slip on a shirt, slop on sunscreen and slap on a hat. This lowers vitamin D3 production. Vitamin D3 is converted primarily in the liver to 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which the immune system depends upon.
In the absence of vitamin D3 supplementation (and there is almost none in food of any kind), it would be best to get some UV-B skin exposure to get at least some vitamin D3, even though all UV-B damages DNA and so increases the risk of skin cancer. Overall, higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels strongly protect against cancer and infections from bacteria, viruses and fungi/yeast.
The trouble is that even with one 25 microgram (1000 IU) vitamin D3 capsule a day (this is the largest capacity capsule which the government allows to be sold in retail stores) most people will have only a fraction of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D the immune system needs to work properly. Slip-slop-slap is perfectly good advice if the person is supplementing sufficient vitamin D3 all year round - but that requires a lot more than 1000 IU a day.
Governments, doctors and all other responsible people should have paid attention to Prof. Brighthope and others who tried to raise awareness of the crucial importance of vitamin D3 supplementation, in the first year of the pandemic. Even a doctor of the highest-possible rank - Professor of Medicine, Peter Ebeling, Head, Department of Medicine, Monash University - was ignored when he pointed out the need for vitamin D3 supplementation among those most affected by the pandemic in Victoria, in August 2020: the elderly, especially in care homes, and those with dark or black skin and who had sun-avoidant lifestyles. At that time, most COVID-19 cases outside nursing homes were among recent immigrants from Africa and the Middle East, in some particular suburbs of Melbourne. Many of those worst affected were Muslims. https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/healthreport/is-there-a-link- between-vitamin-d-and-coronavirus/12566324 .
Governments and many doctors regard this 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) level of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D as sufficient for full health. However, the real figure is 50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L = 1 part in 20,000,000 by mass), since this is the level the immune system needs to function properly.
Please see the research cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ which shows, clearly, that we need to supplement vitamin D3 in sufficient quantities to attain 50 ng/mL circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D. This is needed to supply the intracrine (inside each cell) and paracrine (to nearby cells, often of different types) signaling systems of many types of immune cell, and some other cell types which are involved in neurodevelopment. These signaling systems are crucial to each cell's ability to alter its behavior in response to its changing circumstances. Neither vitamin D3 nor 25-hydroxyvitamin D function as hormones. They are not signaling molecules.
This page begins with 2014 research from Massachusetts General Hospital which shows the risk of post-operative infections increasing dramatically the further below 50 ng/mL the patients' pre-operative 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was. The risk of both surgical site infections and hospital acquired infections was about 2.5% for patients whose pre-operative 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 50 ng/mL or more.
Most people have 10 to 25 ng/mL (25 to 62.5 nmol/L using the units used in Australia, the UK, New Zealand and perhaps Canada) unless they are supplementing vitamin D3 properly or have recently had a lot of (cancer risk increasing) ultraviolet B exposure of their ideally white skin. In this study, the risk of each of these two kinds of post-operative infection rose to 25% for patients whose pre-operative 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 20 ng/mL. Some people - especially the elderly, those suffering from obesity, those with brown or black skin and/or sun avoidant lifestyles - have levels below 10 ng/mL.
Chauss et al. found permanently inflammatory Th1 regulatory lymphocytes in the lungs of hospitalised COVID-19 patients: "Autocrine vitamin D signaling switches off pro-inflammatory programs of Th1 cells" Nature Immunology 2021-11-11 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-021-01080-3. (They are actually studying intracrine signalling - autocrine is with the receptors on the outside of the cell, but here they are in the cytosol. I made the same mistake at first). My summary of this dense cell biology article, or at least of its preprint, is at: https://aminotheory.com/cv19/icu/#2021-Chauss. These cells, unlike the Th1 cells from healthy controls, failed to transition from their pro-inflammatory startup program to their anti-inflammatory shutdown program, despite detecting the condition to do so (high level of a complement protein). In the final article, researchers concluded that this failure was due largely or entirely to inadequate supplies of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of the patients was not available, but it is well known that people with even lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels than the poor levels in the general population (compared to 50 ng/mL) are most likely to develop severe COVID-19 symptoms.
Most doctors and immunologists have never heard of these 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) intracrine and paracrine signaling systems, which are unrelated to hormonal (endocrine) signaling.
Calcitriol functions as a hormone - a blood-borne, long distance, signaling molecule - when the kidneys maintain a very low level of it in the bloodstream, such as 0.05 to 0.1 ng/mL. This enables the kidneys to affect the behavior of several types of cell, all over the body, which are involved in calcium, phosphate and bone metabolism.
Many types of immune cell rely on 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol intracrine signaling in order to alter their behavior in response to their changing circumstances. When a cell-type specific condition is detected, the cells hydroxylate intracellular 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol, which functions as an intracrine agent (not a hormone) and binds with "vitamin D receptor" VDR molecules, which are also produced inside the cell in response to this condition. VDR is best thought of as the calcitriol receptor, since it binds strongly to this and only very weakly to vitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The bound complex finds its way to the nucleus where it binds with retinol X and the triple complex up- and down-regulates the transcription of dozens to hundred of genes, in a cell-type specific manner, so altering the production of mRNA molecules which direct the cell's protein synthesis mechanisms. The cell's behavior is changed by these changes to protein production.
See https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-how- much for bodyweight and obesity status based recommendations from New Jersey based Professor of Medicine on how much vitamin D3 to supplement, on average, per day to attain at least 50 ng/mL circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D. For 70 kg 154 lb body weight without obesity, this is about 125 micrograms a day, AKA 5000 IU. This sounds like a lot, but it is a gram every 22 years, and pharma-grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 a gram ex-factory.
He recently repeated these recommendations in an article co-written by two other professors - one of medicine and the other of pediatrics: Integrating Endocrine, Genomic, and Extra-Skeletal Benefits of Vitamin D into National and Regional Clinical Guidelines Sunil J. Wimalawansa, Scott T. Weiss and Bruce W. Hollis, Nutrients 2024-11-20 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/22/3969.
Pre-bunking and very effective.
Anyone note the disparaging of meat as a cause of cancer!!
Is it rational to blame an ancestral food for a modern-day disease?
Interesting that the pathetic creatures are even acknowledging the problem. If it weren't so beyond tragic, I'd call the ABC the greatest comedy act of all time.
It is NOT comedy , but another word beginning with the letter C
Mysterious rise in turbo Cancer correllates with covid poison rollout in 2021 but the experts can’t see a link…..can you see it …?🤷🏻♂️🦧🤦
No, you’d better point it out to me. Are there Grant Simmons in other parts of the world who all make the same sorts of comments? 😱
The poison jab is the cause of cancer
I can't believe that the doctors and scientists are still baffled. I am a lay person and saw a problem with these so-called vaccines when they were first talked about in 2020. So what is wrong with all these experts??? All bought out are they.
You may be interested in watching the latest Club Grubbery interview, regarding this program.
https://clubgrubbery.com.au/graham-and-john-speak-with-professor-angus-dalgleish/
The ABC is a shameless propaganda machine of an incompetent government. On 14 July 2022, 7.30 Report stated that "For people aged between the age of 50 to 69 the unvaccinated were nearly 37 times more likely to die. While in the oldest age group, the virus was 16 times more fatal for the unvaccinated.” Say no more.
The human story in the 7.30 Report was that a man who had two jabs died after getting COVID. The explanation was he didn't get the booster! https://web.archive.org/web/20220715184624/https://www.abc.net.au/7.30/does-the-new-wave-of-covid-threaten-more-lockdowns/13973764
Yes, of course they would say that wouldn't they. Willfully ignorant in my opinion. But of course the ABC and SBS are fully bought and reveal this by their very bias towards big Pharma and government lies.
🇦🇺💉The wrath of the public is building: https://substack.com/@meshwork3232/note/c-133413884?r=20pd6j&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Disgraceful, we had Triple J on the other day because the music is okay but as soon as they talk- we change the radio station. Anyway we didn't change it quick enough and we caught a brief intro for a discussion about "fake doms" like dominatrix in relationships. I don't even know, but I know it's disgusting as teenagers should not be exposed to these ideas like they are normal; it is the serious corruption of our culture.
I would love to see the old campaign of "Defund the ABC" return.
Norman Swan is guilty of treason
Indeed, it was a sham and a shame of a show. My deep sympathy is for the cancer sufferers depicted in the show.
The positive I take from this disgraceful ignore-the -elephant-in -the -room journalism, is that there must be a lot of public discussion about turbo cancers going on. Hence the perceived need of abcdefail to do this bs story. Since most of us are seeing the cancers all around us, in our families, friends and communities, it is definitely high in people's concerns at present.