OK. Many of my readers refuse to accept there is a virus. You seem to want me to produce proof that a virus exists. I do not have a laboratory and I must rely upon credible information from credible sources. To deny the existence of a Covid virus is to deny the evidence that Baric and his colleagues constructed a virus according to a research proposal and therefore was no need for a cover up. Is this what you are saying? I'm trying to understand.
A case can be made that actually there was no pandemic of a deadly virus, and that most of the observed illness and excess mortality was an artefact of the normal influenza-like illnesses, the lockdowns, and the vaccine. The case depends on the assumption that the Covid PCR tests were unreliable to the extent of creating a false impression that Covid was (a) widespread and (b) the cause of death in most of the people who died after testing positive. The 'no pandemic' case is quite strong, and is supported by intellectually advanced groups such as PANDA in South Africa. Prominent, skilled individual analysts who have reached the same conclusion include Denis Rancourt, Sacha Latypova, Michael Yeadon, David Martin. The statistics are quite persuasive. The vaccine has a lot to answer for.
Prior to covid I believed in viruses, now Im leaning towards toxins and or bacterial infections. I tested this on myself inadvertantly , I havent had C I've been around multiple people who have and family who tested for it and had it badly ( they went on holiday and all got exhausted then came down with "something" )but when I was alone at home and had not been anywhere for weeks I ate some meat that was a bit off , the next couple of days I ended up with flu like symptoms. Toxins purging themselves. So now I'm questioning everything
Regardless, I don`t think the average person would support `gain of function ` research. Anyone who commits unlawful acts should be held accountable, including the perpetrators of the dangerous coerced mRNA bioweapons.
This was not my take on Sach. What he is saying is important. Firstly, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was constructed and, secondly, it was planned well in advance and done in a genetic manner that leaves no trace of construction. I fail to see your concern.
While this may all be true I still have one niggle and it is becoming the elephant in the room. What if the whole notion of a virus is a false construct. It seems to be too “out there” to be true and yet from reading about this proposition for the last year I see no reasonable evidence to suggest otherwise.
I would love to see an unemotional well constructed defence of the virus theory. I keep asking myself, if it is so obvious, where is the science. The defence can’t be too hard to mount. And yet nothing has appeared save for sneers, noise and grandstanding from the virus lobby. Nothing that amounts to a coherent argument or demonstration of their existence. The, “I saw the photo” defence won’t “cut it”.
Let’s get this off the table once and for all. If it is not defendable it certainly changes the way we address the rise of pathogens and the related madness.
I too still hold great reservations on this matter of existence. My workplace supplies medical oxygen to hospitals nursing home and ambulances as well as individual that need it. In the winter of 2018 and 2019, nursing homes where in quarantine already, the flu was going around hence the high volume for those that where already on nebs. Few seem to recall this happening. Imo the whole covid charade was and is still that, a charade. I am left to take it on Dr Malones advice that the virus has been isolated, I trust his word above all at this point, but it is as illusive as the missing sock at the laundromat.
I also hold Dr Malone and others of his ilk in high esteem for all sorts of reasons but if I’ve learnt anything over the last ten years it is that even experts have to take some things as true based on authority, particularly their early learning. You simply can’t go back to basics on everything but have we not learnt that some of that authority rests on very shaky ground. On this Ignaz Semmelweis comes to mind.
Dr Campbell’s growing awareness of the failures of the medical institutions and big pharma over these last 4 years is also refreshingly emblematic of this reality.
The older I get the more I need to go back to first principles and have found that if it can’t or won’t be explained then it’s probably false.
Some of this will be because it is hard to accept what you have believed is false or that you have been lied to by hitherto trusted authorities.
The virus was always there and is everywhere in nature. It could be said that the genetically modified "Covid virus" is not a virus any more but is a man-made construct designed to provide huge profits for the creators as a reward for establishing a means of population control for those with venal aspirations for global power. That is the real conspiracy!
Dr David Martin the man responsible for finding all the patents that GOF “produces’ in its labs has stated in a interview with Alec Zeck that he does not think the Covid ‘virus’ exists
I have come to believe there is no contagious virus and agree with Mike Yeadon and the Baileys etc
This has been happening to a lot of people lately. I’ve been told that since AI was introduced to substack in Dec 2023 there have been problems like this.
Yes, the notion of a virus as causing disease and being able to mutate to defeat our body's defenses is a false construct, designed to get us to literally swallow big pharma's toxic pills and get injected with toxic waste products in the false hope that posioning ourselves will be good for long term health.
In reality it is only good for big pharma etc. wealth!
The virus should be considered as our cellular waste, 'via us' as in the sound of the word.
But you’re assuming that there was, in fact, a virus.
I think the first question that needs to be asked is whether there really was a novel virus, that spread across the world with blazing speed, something that had never occurred before in the history of the world.
Or was it something else?
A horrific flu season, amplified by fear porn, hospital death protocols, and a media and medical conflagration paid millions to convince you that death was at hand?
Poisoning in critical locations?
Clones?
IDK. But if you begin from the premise that there was a ‘novel’ virus (and even if there was a virus it wasn’t novel) you eliminate all the other possibilities and set yourself up to be subjected to exactly the same outcomes when the next novel virus comes around.
Yes agreed. The bulk of the evidence now points to a complete hoax and no novel virus. The binary option pushed through the Overton window was a diversion. I think many people have a problem coming to this conclusion in view of the sheer breathtaking audacity such a conclusion implies on the part of the conspirators. As well as the evil of iatrogenic lies and procedures.
Many highly respected and informed people like Mike Yeadon reached this conclusion long ago and others, like Tess Lawrie, refuse to comment. We each of us must reach our own conclusions on this and it is important because it does change future prospects, especially now that WHO is attempting to take control.
It the UK the seasonal 'flu had been higher in previous years so in 2020 there was a dip, below average deaths. These always tend to peak though in April. As deaths were rising as anticipated as lockdowns were introduced deaths continued to rise, assisted by protocols in the nursing homes and other issues. Ferguson is clever, evn if he is a nasty little man (I am being polite).
I concur. It was an excellent interview with Jeffrey Sachs. I played it to my mother last week as we drove to Canberra. It completely changed her view on the situation in Ukraine and Covid. One thing the interview didn’t cover were the biolabs in Ukraine and the links to those labs via the CIA front company In-Q-Tel and Hunter Biden and John Kerry’s stepson’s company.
I took your advice Phillip; and watched the full video this afternoon. I will say I was generally aware of the circumstances of the motivations behind Russia's military operation in Ukraine. However, Sachs provide nuance that filled in a lot of gaps. I believe the whole geopolitical shenanigans described by Sachs was a good lead up to the origins of the Wuhan 'Virus'. Because in my view the COVID shenanigans have a similar stench! One must wonder; what's the motivation behind COVID and those toxic jabs really about? For people wishing to get a feel for the Carlson/Sachs discussion, but can't find the 2.5 hrs, I've orchestrated a summary at: https://open.substack.com/pub/oxgmcxo/p/tucker-carlsons-chat-with-jeffery?r=pf0i9&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web ... (AMPS book designer and the maker of "Lies ... and More Lies" featuring your good self https://oxgmcxo.substack.com/p/flash-back-11?r=pf0i9)
“Most of us now understand that we have been consistently lied to from the very beginning of the COVID “pandemic”. Nothing we have been told was true.”
As per your own words - yes, we have been consistently lied to but this has been for the last 150 years or more! Absolutely nothing we have been told or taught was true!
Go back to the foundation: there is absolutely no evidence of a spreading pathogenic virus natural or man-made and there never was or has been. Until you can provide that evidence Dr Altman everything you propose, is a lie, built upon another lie. Those running this narrative know this, that is why they use the mantra ‘correlation does not prove causation’ when it suits them. You are playing right into their hands, ready for the next fabricated lab-leaked chicken flu scamdemic.
It is likely that the GOF story is being advertised via large circulation alt media now to get us all alarmed enough to do a rinse and repeat "biosecurity emergency"/"bioweapon release" scenario. Sachs' bottom line seems to be giving the WHO even MORE power to do bio surveillance, inspections and countermeasure rollouts, in line with his longstanding UN sustainability agenda. The WHO One Health fits right into his brief. I am very wary of this "truth teller".
June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled in favor of protecting individual human rights and bodily sovereignty of teachers and other staff of the Los Angeles School Unified District’s (LAUSD), reversing a lower court’s dismissal of their case against the LA County’s School District vaccine mandate for employees.
Announcing this huge win on behalf of their clients, Health Freedom Defense Fund issued a press release, stating that the case was won;
“On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.
The majority, however, noted that HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the COVID jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 but only purport to mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.
The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject to, and survives, the rational basis test.”
The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.”
When HFDF asked the court to opine as to whether or not the CDC’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccines were ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?”
Legal Precedent for U.S. Citizens to Deny Medical Treatment
Per the HFDF press release, “Judge Collins wrote that the district court “further erred by failing to realize that [HFDF’s] allegations directly implicate a distinct and more recent line of Supreme Court authority” for the proposition that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment[.]” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Washington v. Glucksberg, Judge Collins noted that the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” and that HFDF’s allegations in this case “are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”
The Kingston Report
A Legal Precedent is a LEGAL "Rule Of Law from God". It cannot be bought or suppressed.
A forced medical treatment which BionTech/Pfizer said should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015) and which targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023) - but what for?
Jeffery Sachs is exceptionally well-informed about geo-political world affairs. He, personally, knows - or knew - many of the individuals who influenced (if not, literally, decided) the fate of nations and billions of people in the 20th century and to date.
The foregoing and his PERSONAL involvement in related advisory and diplomatic roles made what he had to say during the 2 hours and 24 minutes Tucker Carlson interview unique and invaluable.
"Our" Dr Phillip Altman drew our attention to the interview and suggested we watch it right through. Of course, the primary focus of Phillip's Substack is about government and bureaucratic responses to COVID-19 and especially about the experimental COVID-19 gene therapy injections. So the preoccupation of most of these comments is probably to be expected: ie re whether viruses even exist, which disease experts are right and wrong, which ones can be trusted, which ones are or might be controlled opposition, etc -
However, if Jeffrey Sachs were to read these comments, I wonder if he would be reassured that we really understand the gravity of what he was trying to tell us?
On reading these comments, would he think that we fully understand that it is our apathy, complacency and gullibility over many decades that have allowed the lies of elected and unelected authority-figures to bring us to the brink of WWIII and (literally and possibly within just seconds) to the brink of a nuclear Armageddon *scenario?
I believe the insights and stories Professor Sachs shared in that interview - including the background to the Ukraine proxy war against Russia and the origins of COVID-19 - were NOT intended by him to be lessons in military history and biology.
He shared those insights and stories to WARN us that we MUST hold those who have led us to where we are today accountable...because unchecked, they and their lies will lead us to nuclear war.
Jeffrey Sachs' message to Tucker Carlson and to us all was, surely, that only a few seconds might be left before it will be...
GAME OVER.
*Professor Sachs is not alone in this opinion.
Many well-informed others have been saying exactly the same thing: people like Professor John Mearsheimer, Col. Douglas Macgregor, Victor Davis Hanson, Scott Ritter, former UK diplomat, Alastair Crooke and Leo Hohmann, to name just a few.
In my comment above, I paid tribute to Professor Sachs' impressive credentials and to his exceptionally well-informed commentary and analysis in the video - regarding both the Ukraine proxy war against Russia and also Fauci's involvement in providing funding for gain of function (GOF) research - including GOF research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
I stand by what I wrote above. However, having watched many interviews in which Professor Sachs shares his views concerning Israel's ongoing response to the October 7 attack by HAMAS, I believe it is important to differentiate between Professor Sachs' conclusions concerning the Ukraine-Russia proxy war + WIV research vs. his commentary re Israel's response to what HAMAS did on October 7.
For the record (and for anyone who keeps monitoring these comments) , I do not believe Professor Sachs' conclusions concerning Israel's ongoing response to the HAMAS October 7 attack and atrocities are as well-informed as they could be.
To better understand Israel's response to the HAMAS October 7 atrocities, I believe Professor Sachs (and anyone else who is interested) need to consult former Pentagon National Security Advisor, Major Stephen Coughlin (ret'd) - author of "Catastrophic Failure - blindfolding America in the face of jihad" and/or to read that book. Coincidentally, Major Stephen Coughlin speaks Russian and (although I am not aware of them) his views concerning the Ukraine-Russia proxy war would also be well worth considering.
Also, to be better-informed concerning Israel's ongoing response to the October 7 HAMAS attacks and atrocities, Professor Sachs (and anyone else who is interested) would be well-advised to read EVERYTHING written in Pakistani Brigadier SK Malik's book, "The Qur'anic Concept of War" - including what was written in that book by Pakistan's former leader, General Zia ul Haq and senior Pakistani diplomat, Allah Buksh K Brohi.
Phillip, thank you for the heads up re Tucker's absolutely seminal interview with Professor Jeffrey Sachs.
Contrived and systemic deception by many of those who have brought us to where we are today is the core message that pervades the entire interview. THAT is also the interview's most important lesson, IMO...
ie
Our experience with COVID-19 must INSTRUCT us. It must become a test and a measure of our resolve.
If we let them...
...those who misrepresent what is "safe and effective" will also misrepresent the history, causes, costs and risks of the proxy war being waged against Russia in Ukraine. If we let them keep lying to us, they will soon CONSCRIPT Australians to fight in that war- just as contemptuously.
...those who continue to lie about COVID-19 while incessantly promoting fear of "THE NEXT PANDEMIC" will, just as contemptuously, OBSTRUCT and DERAIL the efforts of those who are trying to end THE EXISTING PANDEMIC OF EXCESS DEATHS. Preventing excess deaths should be a top government priority - but, clearly, it's not.
That's why it's so important that we don't waver in our determination to have the whole terrible truth told about government and bureaucratic responses to COVID-19 (NOW, not in 20 years' time) ....
...nor waver in our determination to prevent our government(s) and bureaucrats EVER lying to us again with impunity.
Thank you for your post. We have as you say been lied to from the beginning of COVID 19, although in reality we have been lied to about a lot of things for a very, very long time.
As regards the origin of the so-called virus it was not natural or strictly man-made except in the original definition of virus as 'poison, slime or venom'.
The issue can be considered from different aspects but in 2020 the Wuhan issue was in fact the horrible industrial pollution which occurred every winter as a result of temperature inversion. I explain more here.
It was made to appear transmissible by advertising and manipulation when the same thing occurred in northern Italy, very cold and polluted in industrial areas of the Po valley.
As regards what the virus is I explain here, but in essence it is cellular debris, waste material and not disease causing as such. It arises from us, 'via us' like the sound of the word 'virus'.
Whatever goes on in laboratories it is to produce toxic products, chemical rather than biological weapons. The real threats are from big pharma drugs and vaccines and all the other chemicals in air, food and water, let alone the probable risks from EMF's.
In terms of lab leaks and related risks from ongoing gain of function research, note that Australia now belongs to an International MCM (Medical CounterMeasures) Consortium under an American-led four nation Cooperative Program - an agreement between the Defense and Health departments of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and (!!!) Australia (!!!) to protect against CBR (Chemical Biological Radiological) threats, emerging infectious diseases and pandemics. Note that CSIRO's Australian Animal Health Laboratory in Geelong has been renamed (!!!) Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (!!!). Our CSIRO and our government are fully committed to the military model of bioweapons and biodefence research which gave us not only Covuid but also the horrific, military-style Covid response.
All viruses are manmade, there is no naturally occurring virus, prove to me otherwise. All disease is related to dis-ease of he body, exposure to chemicals and heavy metals, lack of nutrition and sanitation, stress and lack of suitable housing as so forth.
OK. Many of my readers refuse to accept there is a virus. You seem to want me to produce proof that a virus exists. I do not have a laboratory and I must rely upon credible information from credible sources. To deny the existence of a Covid virus is to deny the evidence that Baric and his colleagues constructed a virus according to a research proposal and therefore was no need for a cover up. Is this what you are saying? I'm trying to understand.
A case can be made that actually there was no pandemic of a deadly virus, and that most of the observed illness and excess mortality was an artefact of the normal influenza-like illnesses, the lockdowns, and the vaccine. The case depends on the assumption that the Covid PCR tests were unreliable to the extent of creating a false impression that Covid was (a) widespread and (b) the cause of death in most of the people who died after testing positive. The 'no pandemic' case is quite strong, and is supported by intellectually advanced groups such as PANDA in South Africa. Prominent, skilled individual analysts who have reached the same conclusion include Denis Rancourt, Sacha Latypova, Michael Yeadon, David Martin. The statistics are quite persuasive. The vaccine has a lot to answer for.
Prior to covid I believed in viruses, now Im leaning towards toxins and or bacterial infections. I tested this on myself inadvertantly , I havent had C I've been around multiple people who have and family who tested for it and had it badly ( they went on holiday and all got exhausted then came down with "something" )but when I was alone at home and had not been anywhere for weeks I ate some meat that was a bit off , the next couple of days I ended up with flu like symptoms. Toxins purging themselves. So now I'm questioning everything
Regardless, I don`t think the average person would support `gain of function ` research. Anyone who commits unlawful acts should be held accountable, including the perpetrators of the dangerous coerced mRNA bioweapons.
This was not my take on Sach. What he is saying is important. Firstly, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was constructed and, secondly, it was planned well in advance and done in a genetic manner that leaves no trace of construction. I fail to see your concern.
While this may all be true I still have one niggle and it is becoming the elephant in the room. What if the whole notion of a virus is a false construct. It seems to be too “out there” to be true and yet from reading about this proposition for the last year I see no reasonable evidence to suggest otherwise.
I would love to see an unemotional well constructed defence of the virus theory. I keep asking myself, if it is so obvious, where is the science. The defence can’t be too hard to mount. And yet nothing has appeared save for sneers, noise and grandstanding from the virus lobby. Nothing that amounts to a coherent argument or demonstration of their existence. The, “I saw the photo” defence won’t “cut it”.
Let’s get this off the table once and for all. If it is not defendable it certainly changes the way we address the rise of pathogens and the related madness.
Indeed. Dr Mike Yeadon has explained this in great detail and convinced me that this is in fact the greatest lie.
He is probably the most censored person on “our side”, even by other so called truthers which tells me he is over the target.
Dr Yeadon is the best!!!!
I too still hold great reservations on this matter of existence. My workplace supplies medical oxygen to hospitals nursing home and ambulances as well as individual that need it. In the winter of 2018 and 2019, nursing homes where in quarantine already, the flu was going around hence the high volume for those that where already on nebs. Few seem to recall this happening. Imo the whole covid charade was and is still that, a charade. I am left to take it on Dr Malones advice that the virus has been isolated, I trust his word above all at this point, but it is as illusive as the missing sock at the laundromat.
I don’t trust Dr Malone, I believe he is C.O., and has stated inconsistencies.
I don’t believe there is a covid virus.
I also hold Dr Malone and others of his ilk in high esteem for all sorts of reasons but if I’ve learnt anything over the last ten years it is that even experts have to take some things as true based on authority, particularly their early learning. You simply can’t go back to basics on everything but have we not learnt that some of that authority rests on very shaky ground. On this Ignaz Semmelweis comes to mind.
Dr Campbell’s growing awareness of the failures of the medical institutions and big pharma over these last 4 years is also refreshingly emblematic of this reality.
The older I get the more I need to go back to first principles and have found that if it can’t or won’t be explained then it’s probably false.
Some of this will be because it is hard to accept what you have believed is false or that you have been lied to by hitherto trusted authorities.
Science has been shown to change frequently. I believe a lot of health practitioner
learning is flawed, and is thus brainwashing.
The people behind this scam play a very long game.
I agree with what you say “if it can’t or won’t be explained then it’s probably false”.
The virus was always there and is everywhere in nature. It could be said that the genetically modified "Covid virus" is not a virus any more but is a man-made construct designed to provide huge profits for the creators as a reward for establishing a means of population control for those with venal aspirations for global power. That is the real conspiracy!
Dr David Martin the man responsible for finding all the patents that GOF “produces’ in its labs has stated in a interview with Alec Zeck that he does not think the Covid ‘virus’ exists
I have come to believe there is no contagious virus and agree with Mike Yeadon and the Baileys etc
Mike Yeadon and the Drs Bailey etc-yay-they show truth!
Dr David Martin-need to be careful with him as he is controlled opposition, Illuminati/Freemason. Has eye of Horus tattooed on his left biceps
For some reason I can’t seem to like any posts except the actual article
Rest assured there are many I would have liked
There have been issues with at least one browser. Swapping browsers helped me.
This has been happening to a lot of people lately. I’ve been told that since AI was introduced to substack in Dec 2023 there have been problems like this.
Don’t worry too much about it Paul !
COVID 19 is a charade as you say, a psy op. The aim was to scare as many as possible into being injected with toxic waste.
As to the virus I try to explain here.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/coronavirus-is-it-really-a-monster?utm_source=publication-search
Yes, the notion of a virus as causing disease and being able to mutate to defeat our body's defenses is a false construct, designed to get us to literally swallow big pharma's toxic pills and get injected with toxic waste products in the false hope that posioning ourselves will be good for long term health.
In reality it is only good for big pharma etc. wealth!
The virus should be considered as our cellular waste, 'via us' as in the sound of the word.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/coronavirus-is-it-really-a-monster?utm_source=publication-search
But you’re assuming that there was, in fact, a virus.
I think the first question that needs to be asked is whether there really was a novel virus, that spread across the world with blazing speed, something that had never occurred before in the history of the world.
Or was it something else?
A horrific flu season, amplified by fear porn, hospital death protocols, and a media and medical conflagration paid millions to convince you that death was at hand?
Poisoning in critical locations?
Clones?
IDK. But if you begin from the premise that there was a ‘novel’ virus (and even if there was a virus it wasn’t novel) you eliminate all the other possibilities and set yourself up to be subjected to exactly the same outcomes when the next novel virus comes around.
People don’t ask the right questions.
Yes agreed. The bulk of the evidence now points to a complete hoax and no novel virus. The binary option pushed through the Overton window was a diversion. I think many people have a problem coming to this conclusion in view of the sheer breathtaking audacity such a conclusion implies on the part of the conspirators. As well as the evil of iatrogenic lies and procedures.
Many highly respected and informed people like Mike Yeadon reached this conclusion long ago and others, like Tess Lawrie, refuse to comment. We each of us must reach our own conclusions on this and it is important because it does change future prospects, especially now that WHO is attempting to take control.
Ask about what radio waves and emfs do to our bodies, what symptoms do they produce? This is a good question in my opinion.
It the UK the seasonal 'flu had been higher in previous years so in 2020 there was a dip, below average deaths. These always tend to peak though in April. As deaths were rising as anticipated as lockdowns were introduced deaths continued to rise, assisted by protocols in the nursing homes and other issues. Ferguson is clever, evn if he is a nasty little man (I am being polite).
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/07/02/neil-ferguson-how-did-his-covid-19-statistics-fool-the-world/
I concur. It was an excellent interview with Jeffrey Sachs. I played it to my mother last week as we drove to Canberra. It completely changed her view on the situation in Ukraine and Covid. One thing the interview didn’t cover were the biolabs in Ukraine and the links to those labs via the CIA front company In-Q-Tel and Hunter Biden and John Kerry’s stepson’s company.
I took your advice Phillip; and watched the full video this afternoon. I will say I was generally aware of the circumstances of the motivations behind Russia's military operation in Ukraine. However, Sachs provide nuance that filled in a lot of gaps. I believe the whole geopolitical shenanigans described by Sachs was a good lead up to the origins of the Wuhan 'Virus'. Because in my view the COVID shenanigans have a similar stench! One must wonder; what's the motivation behind COVID and those toxic jabs really about? For people wishing to get a feel for the Carlson/Sachs discussion, but can't find the 2.5 hrs, I've orchestrated a summary at: https://open.substack.com/pub/oxgmcxo/p/tucker-carlsons-chat-with-jeffery?r=pf0i9&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web ... (AMPS book designer and the maker of "Lies ... and More Lies" featuring your good self https://oxgmcxo.substack.com/p/flash-back-11?r=pf0i9)
“Most of us now understand that we have been consistently lied to from the very beginning of the COVID “pandemic”. Nothing we have been told was true.”
As per your own words - yes, we have been consistently lied to but this has been for the last 150 years or more! Absolutely nothing we have been told or taught was true!
Go back to the foundation: there is absolutely no evidence of a spreading pathogenic virus natural or man-made and there never was or has been. Until you can provide that evidence Dr Altman everything you propose, is a lie, built upon another lie. Those running this narrative know this, that is why they use the mantra ‘correlation does not prove causation’ when it suits them. You are playing right into their hands, ready for the next fabricated lab-leaked chicken flu scamdemic.
Phillip, may I suggest you listen to this critique of Sachs, when he first came out with this "reveal" two years ago?
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1641455421?filter=all&sort=time
It is likely that the GOF story is being advertised via large circulation alt media now to get us all alarmed enough to do a rinse and repeat "biosecurity emergency"/"bioweapon release" scenario. Sachs' bottom line seems to be giving the WHO even MORE power to do bio surveillance, inspections and countermeasure rollouts, in line with his longstanding UN sustainability agenda. The WHO One Health fits right into his brief. I am very wary of this "truth teller".
June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled in favor of protecting individual human rights and bodily sovereignty of teachers and other staff of the Los Angeles School Unified District’s (LAUSD), reversing a lower court’s dismissal of their case against the LA County’s School District vaccine mandate for employees.
Announcing this huge win on behalf of their clients, Health Freedom Defense Fund issued a press release, stating that the case was won;
“On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.
The majority, however, noted that HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the COVID jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 but only purport to mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.
The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject to, and survives, the rational basis test.”
The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.”
When HFDF asked the court to opine as to whether or not the CDC’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccines were ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?”
Legal Precedent for U.S. Citizens to Deny Medical Treatment
Per the HFDF press release, “Judge Collins wrote that the district court “further erred by failing to realize that [HFDF’s] allegations directly implicate a distinct and more recent line of Supreme Court authority” for the proposition that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment[.]” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Washington v. Glucksberg, Judge Collins noted that the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” and that HFDF’s allegations in this case “are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”
The Kingston Report
A Legal Precedent is a LEGAL "Rule Of Law from God". It cannot be bought or suppressed.
A forced medical treatment which BionTech/Pfizer said should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015) and which targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023) - but what for?
GAME OVER?
Jeffery Sachs is exceptionally well-informed about geo-political world affairs. He, personally, knows - or knew - many of the individuals who influenced (if not, literally, decided) the fate of nations and billions of people in the 20th century and to date.
The foregoing and his PERSONAL involvement in related advisory and diplomatic roles made what he had to say during the 2 hours and 24 minutes Tucker Carlson interview unique and invaluable.
"Our" Dr Phillip Altman drew our attention to the interview and suggested we watch it right through. Of course, the primary focus of Phillip's Substack is about government and bureaucratic responses to COVID-19 and especially about the experimental COVID-19 gene therapy injections. So the preoccupation of most of these comments is probably to be expected: ie re whether viruses even exist, which disease experts are right and wrong, which ones can be trusted, which ones are or might be controlled opposition, etc -
However, if Jeffrey Sachs were to read these comments, I wonder if he would be reassured that we really understand the gravity of what he was trying to tell us?
On reading these comments, would he think that we fully understand that it is our apathy, complacency and gullibility over many decades that have allowed the lies of elected and unelected authority-figures to bring us to the brink of WWIII and (literally and possibly within just seconds) to the brink of a nuclear Armageddon *scenario?
I believe the insights and stories Professor Sachs shared in that interview - including the background to the Ukraine proxy war against Russia and the origins of COVID-19 - were NOT intended by him to be lessons in military history and biology.
He shared those insights and stories to WARN us that we MUST hold those who have led us to where we are today accountable...because unchecked, they and their lies will lead us to nuclear war.
Jeffrey Sachs' message to Tucker Carlson and to us all was, surely, that only a few seconds might be left before it will be...
GAME OVER.
*Professor Sachs is not alone in this opinion.
Many well-informed others have been saying exactly the same thing: people like Professor John Mearsheimer, Col. Douglas Macgregor, Victor Davis Hanson, Scott Ritter, former UK diplomat, Alastair Crooke and Leo Hohmann, to name just a few.
In my comment above, I paid tribute to Professor Sachs' impressive credentials and to his exceptionally well-informed commentary and analysis in the video - regarding both the Ukraine proxy war against Russia and also Fauci's involvement in providing funding for gain of function (GOF) research - including GOF research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
I stand by what I wrote above. However, having watched many interviews in which Professor Sachs shares his views concerning Israel's ongoing response to the October 7 attack by HAMAS, I believe it is important to differentiate between Professor Sachs' conclusions concerning the Ukraine-Russia proxy war + WIV research vs. his commentary re Israel's response to what HAMAS did on October 7.
For the record (and for anyone who keeps monitoring these comments) , I do not believe Professor Sachs' conclusions concerning Israel's ongoing response to the HAMAS October 7 attack and atrocities are as well-informed as they could be.
To better understand Israel's response to the HAMAS October 7 atrocities, I believe Professor Sachs (and anyone else who is interested) need to consult former Pentagon National Security Advisor, Major Stephen Coughlin (ret'd) - author of "Catastrophic Failure - blindfolding America in the face of jihad" and/or to read that book. Coincidentally, Major Stephen Coughlin speaks Russian and (although I am not aware of them) his views concerning the Ukraine-Russia proxy war would also be well worth considering.
Also, to be better-informed concerning Israel's ongoing response to the October 7 HAMAS attacks and atrocities, Professor Sachs (and anyone else who is interested) would be well-advised to read EVERYTHING written in Pakistani Brigadier SK Malik's book, "The Qur'anic Concept of War" - including what was written in that book by Pakistan's former leader, General Zia ul Haq and senior Pakistani diplomat, Allah Buksh K Brohi.
Phillip, thank you for the heads up re Tucker's absolutely seminal interview with Professor Jeffrey Sachs.
Contrived and systemic deception by many of those who have brought us to where we are today is the core message that pervades the entire interview. THAT is also the interview's most important lesson, IMO...
ie
Our experience with COVID-19 must INSTRUCT us. It must become a test and a measure of our resolve.
If we let them...
...those who misrepresent what is "safe and effective" will also misrepresent the history, causes, costs and risks of the proxy war being waged against Russia in Ukraine. If we let them keep lying to us, they will soon CONSCRIPT Australians to fight in that war- just as contemptuously.
...those who continue to lie about COVID-19 while incessantly promoting fear of "THE NEXT PANDEMIC" will, just as contemptuously, OBSTRUCT and DERAIL the efforts of those who are trying to end THE EXISTING PANDEMIC OF EXCESS DEATHS. Preventing excess deaths should be a top government priority - but, clearly, it's not.
That's why it's so important that we don't waver in our determination to have the whole terrible truth told about government and bureaucratic responses to COVID-19 (NOW, not in 20 years' time) ....
...nor waver in our determination to prevent our government(s) and bureaucrats EVER lying to us again with impunity.
🔥DOC MALIK SUBSTACK Dr Sabine Stebel protein engineer
181 - Spike Protein
https://docmalik.substack.com/p/181-spike-protein
TheyLied. Join the campaign to Take Action and Raise Public Awareness at
www.TheyLied.ca
.
Video
https://theylied.substack.com/p/theylied-time-for-action-and-raising
.
Raise Public Awareness
https://theylied.ca/SpreadTheWord.shtml
.
Take Action
https://theylied.ca/TakeAction.shtml
.
Thank you for your post. We have as you say been lied to from the beginning of COVID 19, although in reality we have been lied to about a lot of things for a very, very long time.
As regards the origin of the so-called virus it was not natural or strictly man-made except in the original definition of virus as 'poison, slime or venom'.
The issue can be considered from different aspects but in 2020 the Wuhan issue was in fact the horrible industrial pollution which occurred every winter as a result of temperature inversion. I explain more here.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/wuhan-flu?utm_source=publication-search
It was made to appear transmissible by advertising and manipulation when the same thing occurred in northern Italy, very cold and polluted in industrial areas of the Po valley.
As regards what the virus is I explain here, but in essence it is cellular debris, waste material and not disease causing as such. It arises from us, 'via us' like the sound of the word 'virus'.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/coronavirus-is-it-really-a-monster?utm_source=publication-search
Whatever goes on in laboratories it is to produce toxic products, chemical rather than biological weapons. The real threats are from big pharma drugs and vaccines and all the other chemicals in air, food and water, let alone the probable risks from EMF's.
In terms of lab leaks and related risks from ongoing gain of function research, note that Australia now belongs to an International MCM (Medical CounterMeasures) Consortium under an American-led four nation Cooperative Program - an agreement between the Defense and Health departments of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and (!!!) Australia (!!!) to protect against CBR (Chemical Biological Radiological) threats, emerging infectious diseases and pandemics. Note that CSIRO's Australian Animal Health Laboratory in Geelong has been renamed (!!!) Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (!!!). Our CSIRO and our government are fully committed to the military model of bioweapons and biodefence research which gave us not only Covuid but also the horrific, military-style Covid response.
All viruses are manmade, there is no naturally occurring virus, prove to me otherwise. All disease is related to dis-ease of he body, exposure to chemicals and heavy metals, lack of nutrition and sanitation, stress and lack of suitable housing as so forth.